Analyze test coverage and identify gaps with actionable recommendations
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Updates an existing OpenCode skill to match current platform best practices, fixes deprecated patterns, and validates the result. Use when user says "update opencode skill", "fix opencode skill", "migrate skill to opencode", or wants to modernize an existing OpenCode SKILL.md file.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
You are initiating the OpenCode skill update workflow. This process locates an existing skill, researches current platform best practices, analyzes the skill for outdated patterns, and applies updates with validation.
IMPORTANT: You MUST use the AskUserQuestion tool for ALL questions to the user. Never ask questions through regular text output.
Read the OpenCode platform overview and skill guide:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/platform-overview.md${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/skill-guide.mdFind the skill to update.
If $ARGUMENTS is provided:
If no arguments:
Glob for .opencode/skills/*/SKILL.mdGlob for .claude/skills/*/SKILL.mdGlob for .agents/skills/*/SKILL.mdAskUserQuestion:
Read the selected skill file and store its contents.
Spawn the researcher agent to check latest OpenCode documentation:
Task:
subagent_type: "agent-alchemy-opencode-tools:oc-researcher"
prompt: |
Research the latest OpenCode documentation for skill format compatibility.
Artifact type: skill
Current artifact content:
---
{contents of the skill file}
---
Specific questions:
1. Are there any new skill frontmatter fields since v1.2.10?
2. Have any existing fields been deprecated?
3. Are there new best practices for skill body structure?
4. Any changes to $VARIABLE placeholder handling?
Reference guide: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/skill-guide.md
Compare the existing skill against current best practices. Check for:
| Issue | Detection | Fix |
|---|---|---|
name field missing | Required — must match directory name | Add name: matching the parent directory |
name doesn't match directory | Name and directory must be identical | Fix to match |
allowed-tools present | Experimental field (Agent Skills spec) | Keep if intentional; note as experimental |
model field present | Not supported for skills | Remove; configure in opencode.json |
disable-model-invocation | Not supported | Remove |
argument-hint present | Not a valid OpenCode field | Remove; improve description |
arguments present | Not supported; use $VARIABLES | Remove; convert to $VARIABLE patterns |
Missing description | Required field | Add based on skill content |
| Description too vague | Should include trigger phrases | Improve with specific use cases |
| Issue | Detection | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| File-path skill references | Read .../SKILL.md patterns | Convert to skill({ name: "..." }) |
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} refs | Claude Code path variable | Remove; use name-based loading |
mcp__ tool names | Double-underscore MCP format | Convert to {name}_{tool} single-underscore |
Assumes question in subagent | Subagents can't use question | Restructure to gather info upfront |
| No phase markers | Complex skill without structure | Add numbered phases |
| Missing completion directive | No "complete ALL phases" note | Add critical completion note |
Apply any findings from the researcher agent:
Present the analysis results using text output, organized by severity:
## Update Analysis: {skill-name}
### Errors (must fix)
{list of errors with explanations}
### Warnings (should fix)
{list of warnings with explanations}
### Suggestions (consider)
{list of suggestions}
### Research Notes
{any findings from the researcher agent}
Use AskUserQuestion to get user approval:
Based on user selection, apply the changes:
Edit to modify the skill fileSpawn the validator agent on the updated file:
Task:
subagent_type: "agent-alchemy-opencode-tools:oc-validator"
prompt: |
Validate the following OpenCode artifact:
Type: skill
Path: {path to updated file}
Reference guide: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/skill-guide.md
Present the validation results. If errors remain, offer to fix them.
Show a before/after summary of the changes made.
CRITICAL: Complete ALL 7 phases before finishing.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Analyze test coverage and identify gaps with actionable recommendations
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze an existing spec for inconsistencies, missing information, ambiguities, and structure issues. Use when user says "analyze spec", "review spec", "spec quality check", "validate requirements", "audit spec", or "check spec quality".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Provides architectural pattern knowledge for designing feature implementations including MVC, event-driven, microservices, and CQRS patterns. Use when designing system architecture or choosing implementation patterns.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Executes diagnostic investigation tasks to test debugging hypotheses. Runs tests, traces execution, checks git history, and reports evidence. (converted from agent)
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic, hypothesis-driven debugging workflow with triage-based track routing. Use when asked to "fix this bug", "debug this", "why is this failing", "this is broken", "investigate this error", "track down this issue", or any debugging situation. Supports --deep flag to force full investigation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic, hypothesis-driven debugging workflow with triage-based track routing. Use for debugging, fixing bugs, and investigating errors.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.