Orchestrate iterative visual style searches with branch prompts, decision graphs, feedback loops, and final direction selection.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user is transitioning from a completed retro into a weekly plan, choosing weekly outcomes, scheduling a full ISO week, or asking for "план на неделю", "weekly planning", priorities, capacity, or outcomes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Turn retro findings + existing backlog into a prioritized week with clear outcomes, issues in correct repos, and delegation matrix (founder vs agent).
Weekly planning creates a plan. It does not execute the plan.
Allowed during planning:
Not allowed during planning:
If the user asks to "do this now" while planning, finish or pause planning first, then handle that as a separate execution task.
digraph planning {
rankdir=TB;
node [shape=box];
collect [label="1. Collect all tasks"];
calendar [label="2. Map calendar"];
group [label="3. Group by surface"];
eisenhower [label="4. Eisenhower split"];
outcomes [label="5. Choose outcomes"];
issues [label="6. Create issues\nin correct repos"];
board [label="7. Add to board\nwith W{NN} label"];
page [label="8. Create living\nweekly plan"];
collect -> calendar -> group -> eisenhower -> outcomes -> issues -> board -> page;
}
Sources to scan:
retro:W{NN-1})gh search issues --owner $YOUR_OWNER --state openRead known sources before asking the user. Use calendar, existing issues, project boards, and planning files to establish:
Ask only for facts that are not recoverable from sources, one question at a time.
IMPORTANT: Verify dates before writing outcomes. Do not create deadlines in the past. If the deadline is today, include a time boundary such as "by EOD".
Group tasks by where work happens. Use the repos and task routing defined in AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md config (set up by corp-init).
Example surfaces:
| Surface | Description |
|---|---|
| Product delivery | Main product/service repos |
| Sales/pipeline | CRM, sales tooling |
| Content | Blog, videos, social media |
| Strategy | Planning, cross-cutting decisions |
| Infrastructure | Internal tools, automation |
For each task, classify:
| Urgent | Not Urgent | |
|---|---|---|
| Important | Founder does TODAY | Founder schedules this week |
| Not Important | Agent does async | Parking lot / drop |
Key question per task: "Does this require founder judgment, or can an agent execute it from the issue description?"
Outcomes = results, not tasks. Format: "By Friday, X is true."
Rules:
Example:
Outcome: New feature launched
Check: deployed to production, 0 critical bugs by Friday
Founder: final UX decisions, announcement copy
Agent: implementation, tests, deploy script
CRITICAL: Issue lives where the work happens. Use the task routing from your CLAUDE.md config.
Issue about backend bug → backend repo
Issue about marketing → marketing repo
Issue about content → content repo
Issue about strategy → main planning repo
Before creating any issue:
Label every issue: W{NN} + optionally retro:W{NN-1} if from retro.
All W{NN} issues → your GitHub Project (from CLAUDE.md config: project_id and owner).
Create or use view "W{NN}" filtered by label.
# Add to project (use project_id and owner from your config)
gh project item-add $PROJECT_ID --owner $YOUR_OWNER --url $ISSUE_URL
# Verify
gh search issues --owner $YOUR_OWNER --label "W{NN}" --state open
Resolve the ISO week from the current local date. Never hardcode W34 or copy the previous filename.
python3 skills/weekly-planning/scripts/living_week.py context --workspace . --json
python3 skills/weekly-planning/scripts/living_week.py create --workspace .
The generator creates reports/WNN-plan.html. Before presenting it:
data-placeholder="true".data-area.daily:updated, daily:kanban, and hidden daily:day-slice markers. The local daily skill may replace only these marked regions.The HTML page is a mutable view. Issues/task records and WNN-outcomes.md remain sources of truth. Daily updates preserve the full ISO week and mutate only the marked regions.
| Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|
| All issues in one repo | Route to where work happens |
| Issue created without verification | Check issues + files + data first |
| Outcomes = task list | Rewrite as "by Friday, X is true" |
| Ignoring B2B as "bonus" | Active deals with money = outcomes |
| Publishing paid content publicly | Paid content stays in paid repos |
| Assuming data without checking | Verify with gh issue list + actual files |
| Fixed 3 outcomes limit | As many outcomes as realistic |
| Executing tasks during planning | Capture as outcomes/issues, execute after planning |
| Asking instead of reading | Check source systems first, ask only for missing facts |
This skill runs AFTER weekly-retro. Expected inputs:
retro:W{NN-1})This skill reads config from your project's AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md. Run corp-doctor first to generate or repair the config block, or add manually:
## Agent Operations Config
### Repos (scanned during retro/planning)
repos:
- owner/repo-1 # what it does
- owner/repo-2 # what it does
### GitHub Project
project_id: N
owner: your-github-handle
### Task Routing
routing:
- pattern: "backend, bugs"
repo: owner/backend-repo
- pattern: "content, marketing"
repo: owner/content-repo
- pattern: "strategy, cross-cutting"
repo: owner/main-repo
### Living plan
reports_dir: reports
local_timezone: system
display_timezones:
- Europe/Berlin
- Europe/Moscow
- America/Argentina/Buenos_Aires
areas:
- delivery
- sales
- systems
- content
- people
- strategy
- wealth
wealth_habits:
- sport
- reflection
# All tasks for current week
gh search issues --owner $YOUR_OWNER --label "W{NN}" --state open
# By repo
gh search issues --owner $YOUR_OWNER --label "W{NN}" --state open --json repository,number,title
# Close week (Friday)
gh search issues --owner $YOUR_OWNER --label "W{NN}" --state open --json title,repository
# Review: done / spillover / drop
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Orchestrate iterative visual style searches with branch prompts, decision graphs, feedback loops, and final direction selection.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audits the agent rules in the current folder (AGENTS.md, nested AGENTS.md files) and the skill descriptions the agent sees at start, then reports what to cut, move or rewrite and edits only after the user says yes. Use on «аудит правил», «проверь AGENTS.md», «почему агент не слушается правил», «проверь скиллы».
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Робот агента Personal Corp. Агент делает себе голову робота из набора деталей, хранит её в штабе в stack/avatars.json и кладёт в штаб страницу avatar/robot.html, где робот стоит за партой своего штаба и вокруг видны отделы, без сервера и интернета. На уроке по ссылке входа с экрана урока робот входит в живой класс и горит маячком, пока агент работает. Триггеры /avatar, /avatar <ссылка входа>, сделай себе аватар, покажи своего робота, приди на урок.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when choosing between engines or models for an agent pipeline and the answer must come from measurement on your own data, not from marketing pages: speech recognition for meeting recordings, the model that turns a transcript into notes, the critic model that checks it. Runs every variant in an isolated container, measures time, cost per hour of input (USD and RUB, with price source and date) and quality (WER/CER and course terms for ASR; code checks plus a judge of a different model for LLM steps), writes results.json/csv and one static analytics page. Triggers on "бенчмарк", "сравни движки", "сколько стоит час записи", "какую модель взять для пайплайна", "benchmark the pipeline", "compare ASR engines".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when user asks for Claude Code usage stats, weekly analytics, project activity summary, or wants to see what projects were worked on. Triggers on "аналитика", "статистика claude", "cc stats", "weekly report", "что делал"
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when needing strategic project analysis from multiple independent expert perspectives. Triggers on business decisions, growth strategy, product direction, competitive analysis, or any situation where diverse C-level opinions reduce blind spots
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.