본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

charter

Write, revise or review a charter: the one document that tells an executor what to deliver, what is out of bounds, what the owner already decided, and how each success check will be proven. Use when work needs a written brief before someone else does it, or when asked to write, change or check a charter.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(4)

  • SKILL.md4.7 KB
  • references/questions.md847 B
  • references/template.md2.4 KB
  • scripts/selftest/run-selftest.sh1.5 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

charter

A charter is one markdown file that says what to deliver and how everyone will know it was delivered. A task is named by its charter filename. charter writes it; deliver carries a released charter out. Any kind of project uses it: software, documents, campaigns, research, operations. The owner is whoever owns the work (often the user); speak to them in the language they use.

Prerequisites: none to use it; its selftest needs bash and python3.

Read references/template.md for the file layout and references/questions.md before asking the owner anything.

Rules that keep a charter useful

  • Preserve the owner's words and decisions. Never invent a decision, a fact or a requirement. A missing choice that would change the outcome is asked once, one question at a time, at the end of a message; independent work continues while it waits, and silence is not approval.
  • Read the existing work first (files, documents, data, earlier decisions). Ask nothing they already answer.
  • Every success check names what will be observed, where, and how, and can be answered pass or fail by a real run or inspection. The expected result comes from the requirement or from independent data, never from pasting the program's own output. For a defect, the check reproduces the defect first.
  • Before adding a precondition, check, section or approval step, name the failure it detects and what would change if it failed. If nothing changes, leave it out. By default no checksums, sign-off records, warm-up runs, baselines, fixed snapshots or report formats are entry conditions.
  • By default a security check, a full test suite or a full evaluation enters a charter only if the owner names it. Propose it as a question that says what it would check and what it would block; do not write it in as a requirement on your own judgment. A project may choose otherwise.
  • Say what happens on failure: which operation is logged with its error, what continues. A record or report failure never disables the main result; a real failure stays a failure.
  • Time is finite. A check that takes long states its expected duration from existing timings; by default no full suites unless the owner asks.
  • State what the executor may not do without the owner: publish, send to other people, spend, delete, overturn a recorded decision.

Write

  1. Read the request, adjacent notes and the existing work. Cite settled decisions without copying or locking their source. When the work depends on a third-party product, service or version, read its current official documentation and record the facts that constrain the work with the page and version.
  2. Draft Owner decisions, Outcome, Scope and non-goals, and Success checks from the template. Length follows the work: a few lines for a small task, a sliced charter (named slices, each with its own checks) for a big one. There is one kind of charter, not sizes.
  3. Read it as the executor: for each check, could someone tell pass from fail without asking? Walk one real example through it. Fix the gaps that would make the result fail. Do not run the future work to plan it.
  4. One independent review for the owner's intent and concrete defects (peer-review when it is installed, otherwise a second agent). Fix material findings; no second round unless the owner asks.
  5. Tell the owner what the charter will deliver and any genuine open decision, in plain words, ending with the one question. After the owner approves, set status: released and hand the path to the executor, or to whoever supervises the work.

By default an agent alone never releases a charter: it records the owner's decisions. When the owner is away, leave the charter as a draft for them to release; a project may choose otherwise.

Revise

A scope change updates the affected decisions and checks in the same edit, sets updated, and leaves the rest alone. A replaced charter gets status: superseded and a pointer to its successor. Delivery records delivered only through deliver; never infer it from the header.

Review only

Read the charter and the affected work. Report concrete mismatches, their consequences and the smallest corrections in one local file; do not edit the reviewed charter. Questions go in the conversation. Applying accepted corrections is Revise.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Answer how long agent work will take, how much longer active work needs, or what clock time applies. Estimate full AI-agent wall time, measure active progress first, and get owner-facing times from `sno report-time`. Never estimate human-developer time.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

sno-ai/sno-station-skills6482026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Prove that a reported run caused its intended real effect. Walk the executor path from entry to effect, capture one observable per hop, and report a result a no-op could not produce.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

sno-ai/sno-station-skills6482026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Give the owner one page when they come back from sleep, a meeting or a long run: what got done, what is stuck, what waits for their answer, and what it cost in quota. Use when the owner asks what happened while they were away, wants a status page, or when you finish a long stretch of work and must report it.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

sno-ai/sno-station-skills6482026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Report how many problems the two brains found: mutual review (the other model checks the work, from the peer-review records) and self-check (an agent finds its own error in its own conversation, judged by that agent's own model), side by side. Use when the owner asks whether the second agent or the reviews are worth it, or wants the week's review results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

sno-ai/sno-station-skills6482026년 10월 20일 업데이트

cos

무료

MANUAL-ONLY: load solely when the human owner types `/cos`, uses `$cos`, or asks you to act as the Chief of Staff (COS). The COS is the one agent the owner talks to; it coordinates the owner and the per-project Project Leads (PLs). A task card, charter, or dispatch makes you an executor, not COS.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

sno-ai/sno-station-skills6482026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Turn repeated management failures into enforced COS or PL rules. Load ONLY after the owner has explicitly activated the cos role for this session and the COS core routes here. Never invoke directly.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

sno-ai/sno-station-skills6482026년 10월 20일 업데이트

sno-ai의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고