Track and update action item status from natural language updates like 'Seanのメールには返信しておいた' or 'Lu対応予定'. Integrates with daily-comms-ops workflow. Use when managing action items across communication channels.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
事業継続計画(BCP)と災害復旧計画(DRP)の策定支援スキル。ビジネスインパクト分析、リスク評価、復旧戦略策定、 BCP/DRP文書作成、テスト・訓練計画を提供。ISO 22301準拠。
Use when developing business continuity plans, disaster recovery strategies, or conducting business impact analysis. Triggers: "BCP", "business continuity", "disaster recovery", "DRP", "business impact analysis", "BIA", "contingency planning".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
This skill transforms you into an expert business continuity planner capable of developing comprehensive BCPs and DRPs. By following ISO 22301 standards and industry best practices, you can help organizations prepare for, respond to, and recover from disruptions.
Primary language: Japanese (default), English supported Standards: ISO 22301 (Business Continuity Management) Output format: BCP/DRP documents, BIA reports, test plans, training materials
Use this skill when:
BCP (Business Continuity Plan):
DRP (Disaster Recovery Plan):
Relationship: DRP is a subset of BCP. A comprehensive BCP includes DRP as one component.
Disruption → [RTO] → Service Restored
RTO = Maximum acceptable downtime
Examples:
- Tier 1 (Critical): RTO = 1 hour
- Tier 2 (Important): RTO = 8 hours
- Tier 3 (Normal): RTO = 24 hours
Last Backup ← [RPO] → Disruption
RPO = Maximum acceptable data loss
Examples:
- RPO = 0: No data loss (synchronous replication)
- RPO = 1 hour: Hourly backups
- RPO = 24 hours: Daily backups
MTPD = Point at which disruption becomes catastrophic
Example:
- E-commerce site: MTPD = 4 hours (beyond this, significant revenue loss and customer churn)
Purpose: Identify critical business functions and quantify impact of disruption.
List all business functions/processes:
Example List:
For each function, evaluate:
Criticality Criteria:
Criticality Rating:
| Function | Revenue Impact | Customer Impact | Regulatory | Reputation | Overall Criticality |
|----------|----------------|-----------------|------------|------------|---------------------|
| Order Processing | Very High | High | Medium | High | **Critical** |
| Customer Support | Medium | Very High | Low | High | **High** |
| Payroll | Low | Low | High | Medium | **Medium** |
| Marketing | Low | Low | None | Low | **Low** |
Time Sensitivity Analysis:
Impact = f(Time)
Hour 1-4: Minimal impact, workarounds possible
Hour 4-8: Moderate impact, customer frustration
Hour 8-24: Significant impact, revenue loss
Day 1-3: Severe impact, regulatory issues
Day 3+: Catastrophic, business survival threat
Example:
Function: Order Processing
- Hour 1: Minimal (orders queue)
- Hour 4: Moderate (customers call support)
- Hour 8: Significant ($50K revenue loss, customer complaints)
- Hour 24: Severe ($200K loss, media attention, customer churn)
- Day 3: Catastrophic (irreparable brand damage)
MTPD = 8 hours
RTO Target = 4 hours (before significant impact)
Dependency Mapping:
Business Function: Order Processing
Dependencies:
- People: Sales team, order fulfillment team
- Technology: E-commerce platform, payment gateway, inventory system
- Facilities: Warehouse, office space
- Suppliers: Payment processor, shipping carrier
- Data: Product catalog, customer database, inventory data
Single Points of Failure (SPOF):
Financial Impact Formula:
Total Impact = Direct Costs + Indirect Costs + Opportunity Costs
Direct Costs:
- Lost revenue
- Extra expenses (overtime, expedited shipping)
- Fines and penalties
Indirect Costs:
- Customer compensation
- Productivity loss
- Recovery costs
Opportunity Costs:
- Lost future revenue (customer churn)
- Competitive disadvantage
Example:
Function: E-commerce Website
Downtime: 8 hours
Direct Costs:
- Lost sales: $100,000
- Staff overtime: $5,000
Indirect Costs:
- Customer service calls: $3,000
- Brand damage mitigation: $10,000
Opportunity Costs:
- Customer churn (estimated): $50,000
Total 8-hour Impact: $168,000
Hourly Impact: $21,000/hour
Priority Matrix:
High Impact
│
Tier 1 │ Tier 1
(RTO:1h)│ (RTO:4h)
│
───────┼───────
│
Tier 2 │ Tier 3
(RTO:8h)│(RTO:24h)
│
Low Criticality
Purpose: Identify threats and assess likelihood and impact.
Threat Categories:
Natural Disasters
Technology Failures
Human-Caused
Supply Chain
Facility-Related
Risk Assessment Matrix:
Likelihood:
- Rare: Once in 10+ years
- Unlikely: Once in 5-10 years
- Possible: Once in 2-5 years
- Likely: Once per year
- Almost Certain: Multiple times per year
Impact:
- Insignificant: <$10K, <1 hour
- Minor: $10K-$100K, 1-4 hours
- Moderate: $100K-$500K, 4-24 hours
- Major: $500K-$5M, 1-7 days
- Catastrophic: >$5M, >7 days
Risk Matrix:
Impact │ Rare │Unlikely│Possible│ Likely │Almost Certain
───────────┼──────┼────────┼────────┼────────┼──────────────
Catastrophic│Medium│ High │Extreme │Extreme │ Extreme
Major │ Low │ Medium │ High │Extreme │ Extreme
Moderate │ Low │ Low │ Medium │ High │ High
Minor │ Low │ Low │ Low │ Medium │ Medium
Insignif. │ Low │ Low │ Low │ Low │ Low
Example:
| Threat | Likelihood | Impact | Risk Level | Mitigation Priority |
|--------|------------|--------|------------|---------------------|
| Ransomware | Likely | Major | Extreme | **Immediate** |
| Earthquake | Unlikely | Catastrophic | High | **High** |
| Power Outage | Almost Certain | Moderate | High | **High** |
| Key Person Unavailable | Possible | Minor | Low | **Medium** |
Risk Treatment Options:
Avoid: Eliminate the risk
Reduce: Minimize likelihood or impact
Transfer: Share risk with others
Accept: Accept the risk
Mitigation Plan Example:
Risk: Ransomware Attack
Current Level: Extreme (Likely × Major)
Mitigation Actions:
1. Implement MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication)
2. Deploy EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response)
3. Conduct security awareness training
4. Implement immutable backups (air-gapped)
5. Develop incident response plan
Residual Risk: Medium (Unlikely × Moderate)
Cost: $150,000
Expected Benefit: Avoid $5M loss
ROI: 33:1
Purpose: Define how to recover critical functions within RTO/RPO.
For IT Systems:
Hot Site (RTO: minutes to hours)
Warm Site (RTO: hours to days)
Cold Site (RTO: days to weeks)
Cloud-Based DR (RTO: hours)
For Business Functions:
Alternate Work Location
Manual Workarounds
Outsourcing
Inventory/Stockpiling
Recovery Strategy Comparison:
| Strategy | RTO | RPO | Setup Cost | Annual Cost | Pros | Cons |
|----------|-----|-----|------------|-------------|------|------|
| Hot Site | 1h | 0 | $500K | $200K/yr | Immediate recovery | Very expensive |
| Warm Site | 4-8h | 1h | $200K | $100K/yr | Balanced | Some downtime |
| Cold Site | 1-7d | 24h | $50K | $20K/yr | Cost-effective | Long recovery |
| Cloud DR | 2-4h | 1h | $100K | $50K/yr | Scalable, modern | Dependency on cloud |
Recommendation: For critical systems (Tier 1), use Cloud DR or Warm Site. For non-critical systems (Tier 3), use Cold Site or accept longer RTO.
Recovery Procedure Template:
## Recovery Procedure: [System/Function Name]
### Objective
Restore [System/Function] to operational state within [RTO].
### Scope
- Systems: [List of servers, applications, databases]
- Data: [List of datasets and backup sources]
- Dependencies: [Prerequisites for recovery]
### Roles and Responsibilities
- **Recovery Manager**: [Name]
- **Technical Lead**: [Name]
- **Communication Lead**: [Name]
### Pre-Requisites
- [ ] Disaster declared by [Authority]
- [ ] Recovery site accessible
- [ ] Recovery team mobilized
### Recovery Steps
#### Phase 1: Assessment (0-30 minutes)
1. Assess extent of damage
2. Determine recovery strategy (primary vs. alternate site)
3. Activate recovery team
#### Phase 2: Infrastructure Recovery (30min - 2 hours)
1. Provision cloud resources OR activate alternate site
2. Restore network connectivity
3. Restore storage systems
#### Phase 3: Data Recovery (2 - 4 hours)
1. Identify most recent viable backup
2. Restore database from backup
3. Validate data integrity
#### Phase 4: Application Recovery (4 - 6 hours)
1. Deploy application servers
2. Configure applications
3. Perform smoke tests
#### Phase 5: Validation (6 - 8 hours)
1. End-to-end testing
2. User acceptance testing
3. Performance validation
#### Phase 6: Cutover (8 hours)
1. Update DNS/routing
2. Notify users
3. Monitor closely
### Rollback Plan
If recovery fails, rollback to [previous state] by [procedure].
### Checklists
- [ ] All systems operational
- [ ] Data integrity confirmed
- [ ] Users can access
- [ ] Performance acceptable
Purpose: Create comprehensive, actionable BCP/DRP documents.
# Business Continuity Plan
## 1. Executive Summary
- Purpose and scope
- Key risks and mitigation strategies
- Recovery priorities
## 2. Plan Governance
- Plan owner and approval authority
- Review and update schedule
- Distribution list
## 3. Business Impact Analysis
- Critical functions and RTOs
- Financial impact analysis
- Dependencies
## 4. Risk Assessment
- Threat scenarios
- Risk ratings
- Mitigation strategies
## 5. Recovery Strategies
- Recovery options for each critical function
- Cost-benefit analysis
- Chosen strategies
## 6. Emergency Response Procedures
- Incident detection and notification
- Escalation procedures
- Initial response actions
## 7. Recovery Procedures
- Step-by-step recovery instructions
- Role assignments
- Resource requirements
## 8. Communication Plan
- Internal communication (employees)
- External communication (customers, suppliers, media, regulators)
- Communication templates
## 9. Contact Lists
- Emergency contacts (24/7)
- Vendors and suppliers
- Key stakeholders
## 10. Training and Testing
- Training program
- Test schedule (tabletop, simulation, full)
- Test results and lessons learned
## 11. Plan Maintenance
- Review triggers
- Update procedures
- Version control
## Appendices
- Detailed technical recovery procedures
- Vendor contracts and SLAs
- Floor plans and facility information
- Forms and templates
# Disaster Recovery Plan
## 1. Introduction
- Purpose, scope, objectives
- Assumptions and constraints
## 2. Disaster Scenarios
- Natural disasters
- Technology failures
- Cyber attacks
## 3. Roles and Responsibilities
- DR Team structure
- RACI matrix
## 4. Disaster Declaration
- Criteria for declaring disaster
- Authority and approval process
## 5. Notification Procedures
- Call tree
- Notification templates
- 24/7 contact information
## 6. Recovery Priorities
- System tier classification (Tier 1, 2, 3)
- Recovery sequence
## 7. Recovery Procedures
- Infrastructure recovery
- Data recovery
- Application recovery
- Network recovery
## 8. Recovery Sites
- Primary data center
- Alternate site (Hot/Warm/Cold)
- Cloud DR environment
## 9. Data Backup and Restoration
- Backup schedule
- Backup verification
- Restoration procedures
## 10. Testing and Maintenance
- Test types and frequency
- Test scenarios
- Plan update procedures
## 11. Vendor Management
- Critical vendors and SLAs
- Escalation procedures
## Appendices
- System inventory
- Network diagrams
- Configuration details
- Backup schedules
Purpose: Validate BCP/DRP effectiveness and train personnel.
1. Tabletop Exercise
Example Scenario:
"At 2 AM, the primary data center experiences a fire in the server room.
Initial reports indicate all servers are offline. What do you do?"
Discussion points:
- Who declares the disaster?
- How do you notify the recovery team?
- What is the recovery sequence?
- What are the communication procedures?
2. Walkthrough Test
3. Simulation/Parallel Test
4. Full Interruption Test
Training Components:
Awareness Training (All employees)
Role-Based Training (DR team members)
Leadership Training (Executives, managers)
After each test or actual incident:
1. Immediate Debrief (Within 24 hours)
2. Formal Review (Within 1 week)
3. Plan Updates (Within 1 month)
# Business Impact Analysis Report
## Executive Summary
- Scope and methodology
- Key findings
- Critical functions and RTOs
- Recommendations
## Critical Business Functions
| Function | Criticality | MTPD | RTO Target | Financial Impact (per day) |
|----------|-------------|------|------------|----------------------------|
| Order Processing | Critical | 4 hours | 2 hours | $500,000 |
| Customer Support | High | 8 hours | 4 hours | $50,000 |
| Payroll | Medium | 3 days | 24 hours | $10,000 |
## Dependencies and SPOFs
[Detailed dependency mapping]
## Recommendations
1. Implement hot site for Order Processing system
2. Enhance backup procedures to achieve RPO of 1 hour
3. Cross-train staff to eliminate key person dependencies
# Risk Assessment Report
## Risk Register
| Risk ID | Threat | Likelihood | Impact | Risk Level | Mitigation Strategy | Residual Risk |
|---------|--------|------------|--------|------------|---------------------|---------------|
| R-001 | Ransomware | Likely | Major | Extreme | EDR, MFA, backups | Medium |
| R-002 | Data Center Fire | Unlikely | Catastrophic | High | DR site, cloud | Low |
| R-003 | Key Person Loss | Possible | Moderate | Medium | Cross-training | Low |
## High-Priority Risks
[Detailed mitigation plans for Extreme and High risks]
# BCP/DRP Test Report
## Test Overview
- **Test Type**: Simulation
- **Date**: 2025-01-15
- **Duration**: 4 hours
- **Scenario**: Ransomware attack on primary systems
- **Participants**: 12 (DR team, IT, business stakeholders)
## Test Objectives
1. Validate DR site activation procedures
2. Test data restoration from backups
3. Verify communication procedures
## Test Results
- ✅ DR site activated successfully (Target: 2 hours, Actual: 1.5 hours)
- ⚠️ Data restoration took longer than expected (Target: 4 hours, Actual: 6 hours)
- ✅ Communication procedures effective
## Issues Identified
1. Backup restoration script outdated
2. One team member unaware of role
3. Network bandwidth at DR site insufficient
## Corrective Actions
1. Update restoration scripts and test monthly
2. Conduct refresher training for all team members
3. Upgrade DR site network to 1Gbps
## Recommendation
Plan is generally effective. Address identified issues and retest in 6 months.
BCP/DRP requires visible support from top management.
Review and update plans at least annually, or after major changes.
Set achievable RTOs based on actual recovery capabilities, not wishful thinking.
Untested plans are unreliable. Test at least annually.
Plans should be clear and actionable, not overly complex.
Store plans in multiple locations (cloud, physical, off-site).
Ensure critical vendors have their own BCPs and understand your RTOs.
Clear, timely communication during incidents is critical.
Every test and incident is an opportunity to improve the plan.
Embed resilience into organizational culture, not just a document.
ISO 22301 is the international standard for Business Continuity Management Systems (BCMS).
Key Requirements:
Certification Process:
このスキルの目的は、組織のレジリエンス(回復力)を高め、あらゆる中断に対して準備し、迅速に回復できる能力を構築することです。包括的なBCP/DRPを策定し、定期的にテストし、継続的に改善してください。
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Track and update action item status from natural language updates like 'Seanのメールには返信しておいた' or 'Lu対応予定'. Integrates with daily-comms-ops workflow. Use when managing action items across communication channels.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AI活用提案の専門コンサルタントスキル。LLM・AIエージェントの活用事例知識を基に、業界別、部門別、シーン別に最適なAI導入提案を行います。システム化、業務改善、効率化を得意とし、具体的な活用事例、期待効果、導入ステップを含む実践的な提案を提供します。Use when proposing AI/LLM adoption strategies for specific industries, departments, or business scenarios.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate AI-powered BPO service proposals for Japanese companies in the US market. Use when creating outsourcing proposals with AI service menus, ROI estimation, implementation roadmaps, and bilingual (JA/EN) proposal documents for 在米日系企業向けAI実装.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AI(LLM)が生成した日本語テキストの「AI臭」を検出・診断し、人間らしい文章にリライトするスキル。 Use when: 「AIっぽい文章を直して」「人間らしくリライトして」「AI臭を消して」「この文章をもっと自然にして」 「テキストのAI感を減らして」「機械っぽさを取りたい」 "make this sound more human", "remove AI tone", "humanize this text", "detect if this is AI-generated". 6つのAI特有パターン(視覚的マーカー、単調なリズム、マニュアル的構成、非コミット姿勢、抽象語の濫用、 定型メタファー)を正規表現ベースで検出し、0-100のAI臭スコアを算出。3つの人間化技法 (バランスを崩す・客観を崩す・論理を崩す)でリライトを実行する。 Note: 検出スクリプトは日本語テキスト専用。英語テキストの場合はClaude自身がreferences/を参照して分析・リライトする。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate audit-ready internal control design documents from As-Is business process inventories. Produces control IDs, assertion mappings, procedures, SoD analysis, KPIs, materiality thresholds, and implementation roadmaps. Use when building internal controls for new audit engagements, SOX/J-SOX compliance, or process improvement initiatives.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review audit-related documents (control design documents, bottleneck analyses, requirements definitions, etc.) for quality, scoring them 0-100 with a severity-rated findings list. Use when reviewing audit documents, checking control design quality, or verifying cross-document consistency. Supports documents governed by US GAAP, IFRS, or J-GAAP.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.