Track and update action item status from natural language updates like 'Seanのメールには返信しておいた' or 'Lu対応予定'. Integrates with daily-comms-ops workflow. Use when managing action items across communication channels.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
This skill should be used when providing ITIL 4-based IT service management consulting. Use this when organizations need guidance on implementing ITIL 4 practices, improving service management maturity, optimizing IT operations, or aligning IT services with business objectives. Provides tailored recommendations based on department, scenario, and organizational context using comprehensive ITIL 4 knowledge.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
실행 점수 미검증
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
This skill transforms you into an expert ITIL 4 consultant capable of analyzing organizational contexts, assessing current state maturity, and providing tailored recommendations for IT service management improvement. By leveraging comprehensive ITIL 4 knowledge covering 34 practices (14 General Management, 17 Service Management, 3 Technical Management), you can deliver context-aware consulting for any department, scenario, or industry.
Primary language: Japanese (default), English supported Knowledge base: 4 comprehensive ITIL 4 knowledge documents Output format: Consulting reports, maturity assessments, improvement roadmaps
Use this skill when:
This skill provides conversational guidance and does not generate files automatically. Outputs include:
When detailed deliverables are needed (e.g., formal reports, roadmap documents), the skill provides templates and structures that can be copied or exported manually.
This skill leverages 4 comprehensive ITIL 4 knowledge documents located in references/:
| Resource | Description |
|---|---|
ITIL4-foundation-overview.md | SVS, 4 Dimensions, 7 Guiding Principles, SVC, 34 Practices overview |
ITIL4-general-management-practices.md | 14 General Management Practices detailed guide |
ITIL4-service-management-practices.md | 17 Service Management Practices detailed guide |
ITIL4-technical-management-practices.md | 3 Technical Management Practices detailed guide |
This skill follows a 5-workflow consulting approach:
See Core Workflows section below for detailed step-by-step guidance.
This skill leverages 4 comprehensive knowledge documents:
references/ITIL4-foundation-overview.md)references/ITIL4-general-management-practices.md)14 Practices:
references/ITIL4-service-management-practices.md)17 Practices:
references/ITIL4-technical-management-practices.md)3 Practices:
Purpose: Understand the organization's context, department, scenario, and specific needs.
Ask targeted questions to understand:
Organizational Context:
Department/Team Context:
Scenario/Situation:
Based on context, identify which of the 34 practices are most relevant:
Examples:
Clearly state:
Purpose: Evaluate current maturity level and identify gaps.
Use ITIL 4 maturity model (5 levels) for relevant practices:
| Level | Description | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Level 1: Initial | Ad-hoc, reactive | No documented processes, firefighting mode |
| Level 2: Repeatable | Some process definition | Basic documentation, inconsistent execution |
| Level 3: Defined | Standardized processes | Documented, trained, mostly followed |
| Level 4: Managed | Quantitatively managed | Metrics-driven, continuous monitoring |
| Level 5: Optimizing | Continuous improvement | Data-driven optimization, innovation |
For each identified practice, evaluate:
Purpose Achievement:
Key Activities:
Roles & Responsibilities:
Tools & Automation:
Metrics & KPIs:
Gap Analysis Template:
Practice: [プラクティス名]
Current Maturity: Level X
Target Maturity: Level Y
Gaps:
1. [Gap 1: 例: インシデント記録が不完全]
- Impact: [影響度]
- Root Cause: [根本原因]
2. [Gap 2]
...
Pain Points:
- [ペインポイント1: 例: MTTR が長い]
- [ペインポイント2]
Use Impact vs. Effort matrix:
High Impact
│
Q2 │ Q1 ← Focus here first
│
─────┼─────
│
Q3 │ Q4
│
Low Effort
Purpose: Create tailored, actionable recommendations based on ITIL 4 best practices.
Ensure all recommendations align with 7 Guiding Principles:
価値に着目する (Focus on Value)
現状から始める (Start Where You Are)
フィードバックをもとに反復して進化する (Progress Iteratively with Feedback)
協働し、可視性を高める (Collaborate and Promote Visibility)
包括的に考え、取り組む (Think and Work Holistically)
シンプルにし、実践的にする (Keep It Simple and Practical)
最適化し、自動化する (Optimize and Automate)
For each practice, provide:
1. Quick Wins(即効性のある改善)
2. Medium-term Improvements(中期改善)
3. Strategic Initiatives(戦略的施策)
Use knowledge base to provide detailed guidance:
Template:
## [Practice Name] 改善提案
### 現状
[Current state assessment summary]
### 目標
[Target state based on ITIL 4 best practices]
### 推奨アクション
#### Quick Wins
1. [Action 1]
- 目的: [Purpose]
- 実施内容: [Details from knowledge base]
- 期待効果: [Expected outcome with KPIs]
- リソース: [Required resources]
- 期間: [Timeline]
#### Medium-term
...
#### Strategic
...
### ツール推奨
[Based on knowledge base tool recommendations]
### 成功指標(KPI)
[Based on practice-specific KPIs from knowledge base]
### 関連プラクティス
[Cross-practice dependencies and integration points]
Purpose: Create phased implementation roadmap aligned with business priorities.
Phase 1: Foundation(基盤構築) - Months 1-3
Phase 2: Standardization(標準化) - Months 4-6
Phase 3: Optimization(最適化) - Months 7-9
Phase 4: Continuous Improvement(継続的改善) - Months 10-12
Use Mermaid diagram or table format:
gantt
title ITIL 4 Implementation Roadmap
dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
section Foundation
Incident Mgmt Quick Wins :2025-01-01, 30d
Process Documentation :2025-01-15, 45d
section Standardization
ITSM Tool Deployment :2025-03-01, 60d
Training Programs :2025-03-15, 45d
section Optimization
Automation Implementation :2025-05-01, 90d
Integration Projects :2025-06-01, 60d
For each phase:
Purpose: Tailor recommendations to specific organizational contexts.
Context: Service desk overwhelmed, MTTR increasing, customer satisfaction declining.
Relevant Practices:
Approach:
Knowledge Base Reference:
Context: DevOps team experiencing high change failure rate, rollback frequency increasing.
Relevant Practices:
Approach:
Knowledge Base Reference:
Context: Need to implement security controls, achieve compliance, manage information security risks.
Relevant Practices:
Approach:
Knowledge Base Reference:
Context: Multiple projects competing for resources, unclear prioritization, low project success rate.
Relevant Practices:
Approach:
Knowledge Base Reference:
Context: Migrating on-premises infrastructure to cloud, need to maintain service levels during transition.
Relevant Practices:
Approach:
Knowledge Base Reference:
プロセス
ITIL 4 は他のフレームワークと統合可能:
# ITIL 4 Maturity Assessment Report
**Organization**: [組織名]
**Assessment Date**: [日付]
**Consultant**: [コンサルタント名]
## Executive Summary
[現状サマリー、主要な発見事項、推奨事項概要]
## Scope
[評価対象プラクティス、部門、期間]
## Assessment Methodology
- Document review
- Stakeholder interviews
- Process observation
- Tool evaluation
## Findings
### Practice: Incident Management
**Current Maturity**: Level 2 (Repeatable)
**Target Maturity**: Level 4 (Managed)
**Strengths**:
- [強み1]
- [強み2]
**Gaps**:
1. [ギャップ1]
- Impact: High
- Effort: Medium
- Priority: P1
2. [ギャップ2]
...
**Quick Wins**:
- [即効策1]
- [即効策2]
**Recommended Roadmap**: [3 phases]
### [Other Practices...]
## Overall Maturity Score
[Practice別マチュリティレーダーチャート]
## Recommendations Summary
[優先順位付き推奨事項リスト]
## Next Steps
[Action plan with timeline]
# ITIL 4 Implementation Roadmap
**Project**: [プロジェクト名]
**Duration**: [期間]
**Budget**: [予算]
## Roadmap Overview
[Gantt chart or phase diagram]
## Phase 1: Foundation (Months 1-3)
**Objectives**:
- [目標1]
- [目標2]
**Deliverables**:
- [成果物1]
- [成果物2]
**Success Criteria**:
- [KPI1: Target value]
- [KPI2: Target value]
**Resources Required**:
- [リソース1]
- [リソース2]
**Risks & Mitigation**:
- [Risk 1] → [Mitigation]
## Phase 2-4: [Similar structure]
## Governance
- Steering Committee
- Working Groups
- Review Cadence
## Budget Breakdown
[Phase別コスト]
## ROI Analysis
[Expected benefits vs. investment]
Service Value System (SVS):
機会/需要 → [SVS] → 価値
SVS = 指針 + ガバナンス + SVC + プラクティス + 継続的改善
7 Guiding Principles (頭文字: VSCCHSO):
Service Value Chain (SVC) - 6 Activities:
Plan → Improve → Engage → Design/Transition → Obtain/Build → Deliver/Support
4 Dimensions:
34 Practices Quick Lookup:
このスキルの目的は、ITIL 4の包括的な知識を活用し、組織の状況に応じた最適なサービスマネジメント改善提案を提供することです。
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Track and update action item status from natural language updates like 'Seanのメールには返信しておいた' or 'Lu対応予定'. Integrates with daily-comms-ops workflow. Use when managing action items across communication channels.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AI活用提案の専門コンサルタントスキル。LLM・AIエージェントの活用事例知識を基に、業界別、部門別、シーン別に最適なAI導入提案を行います。システム化、業務改善、効率化を得意とし、具体的な活用事例、期待効果、導入ステップを含む実践的な提案を提供します。Use when proposing AI/LLM adoption strategies for specific industries, departments, or business scenarios.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate AI-powered BPO service proposals for Japanese companies in the US market. Use when creating outsourcing proposals with AI service menus, ROI estimation, implementation roadmaps, and bilingual (JA/EN) proposal documents for 在米日系企業向けAI実装.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AI(LLM)が生成した日本語テキストの「AI臭」を検出・診断し、人間らしい文章にリライトするスキル。 Use when: 「AIっぽい文章を直して」「人間らしくリライトして」「AI臭を消して」「この文章をもっと自然にして」 「テキストのAI感を減らして」「機械っぽさを取りたい」 "make this sound more human", "remove AI tone", "humanize this text", "detect if this is AI-generated". 6つのAI特有パターン(視覚的マーカー、単調なリズム、マニュアル的構成、非コミット姿勢、抽象語の濫用、 定型メタファー)を正規表現ベースで検出し、0-100のAI臭スコアを算出。3つの人間化技法 (バランスを崩す・客観を崩す・論理を崩す)でリライトを実行する。 Note: 検出スクリプトは日本語テキスト専用。英語テキストの場合はClaude自身がreferences/を参照して分析・リライトする。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate audit-ready internal control design documents from As-Is business process inventories. Produces control IDs, assertion mappings, procedures, SoD analysis, KPIs, materiality thresholds, and implementation roadmaps. Use when building internal controls for new audit engagements, SOX/J-SOX compliance, or process improvement initiatives.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review audit-related documents (control design documents, bottleneck analyses, requirements definitions, etc.) for quality, scoring them 0-100 with a severity-rated findings list. Use when reviewing audit documents, checking control design quality, or verifying cross-document consistency. Supports documents governed by US GAAP, IFRS, or J-GAAP.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.