Track and update action item status from natural language updates like 'Seanのメールには返信しておいた' or 'Lu対応予定'. Integrates with daily-comms-ops workflow. Use when managing action items across communication channels.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
採用・人材戦略の専門スキル。職務記述書(JD)作成、採用計画策定、コンピテンシーモデル設計、 面接評価基準設計、オンボーディング計画をサポート。採用要件の明確化から内定後のフォローまで 一貫した人材獲得プロセスを支援。
日英両言語のテンプレートを提供し、グローバル採用にも対応。
Use when: creating job descriptions, designing competency models, planning recruitment strategies, developing interview evaluation criteria, or creating onboarding plans. Triggers: "JD作成", "採用計画", "面接評価", "オンボーディング", "コンピテンシー", "人材獲得", "job description", "recruitment plan", "interview evaluation", "hiring", "talent acquisition"
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
실행 점수 미검증
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
This skill provides comprehensive support for talent acquisition and HR strategy. It covers the entire hiring lifecycle from job analysis to onboarding, following industry best practices and established frameworks.
| Capability | Description |
|---|---|
| JD Creation | Create comprehensive job descriptions with competency requirements |
| Recruitment Planning | Design recruitment strategies with timelines and KPIs |
| Evaluation Design | Develop structured interview evaluation criteria using STAR method |
| Onboarding | Create 30-60-90 day onboarding plans with mentoring structure |
Creating a new position
Planning recruitment
Designing interviews
Building onboarding program
Use this workflow when creating or updating job descriptions for any position.
Collect essential information about the position:
| Category | Questions to Ask |
|---|---|
| Basic Info | Position title, department, reporting line |
| Purpose | Why does this role exist? What problem does it solve? |
| Scope | Team size, budget responsibility, decision authority |
| Type | Full-time, part-time, contract, remote/hybrid/onsite |
Analyze the role's core responsibilities:
Primary Duties (60-80% of time)
Secondary Duties (20-40% of time)
Decision Authority
Create requirements using the MoSCoW method:
| Category | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Must Have | Non-negotiable requirements | 5+ years experience, specific certification |
| Should Have | Strongly preferred | Industry experience, leadership experience |
| Could Have | Nice to have | Additional languages, specific tools |
| Won't Have | Not required for this role | (Clarify to avoid over-qualified applicants) |
Reference: references/competency_model_guide.md
Define 4-6 competencies using this structure:
| Competency | Level | Behavioral Indicator |
|------------|-------|---------------------|
| Problem Solving | Advanced | Identifies root causes, proposes multiple solutions |
| Communication | Intermediate | Clearly explains technical concepts to non-technical audience |
| Leadership | Basic | Takes initiative, mentors junior team members |
Use template: assets/job_description_template_ja.md or assets/job_description_template_en.md
Quality Checklist:
Use this workflow when planning recruitment activities for one or multiple positions.
Analyze the recruitment requirements:
## Hiring Needs Analysis
| Dimension | Current State | Target State | Gap |
|-----------|--------------|--------------|-----|
| Headcount | [Current] | [Planned] | [Difference] |
| Skill Mix | [Current skills] | [Needed skills] | [Missing skills] |
| Timeline | - | [Target date] | - |
| Budget | - | [Available budget] | - |
Source Selection Matrix:
| Channel | Best For | Cost | Time to Hire |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employee Referrals | Culture fit, verified skills | Low ($) | Short |
| LinkedIn/Direct Sourcing | Passive candidates | Medium ($$) | Medium |
| Job Boards | Active job seekers | Low-Medium ($-$$) | Short |
| Recruitment Agencies | Executive/specialized roles | High ($$$) | Medium |
| Campus Recruiting | Entry-level positions | Medium ($$) | Seasonal |
Standard Recruitment Timeline:
gantt
title Recruitment Timeline
dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
section Planning
Needs Analysis :a1, 2025-01-01, 5d
JD Creation :a2, after a1, 3d
section Sourcing
Job Posting :b1, after a2, 2d
Active Sourcing :b2, after a2, 14d
section Selection
Resume Screening :c1, after b1, 7d
First Interview :c2, after c1, 10d
Second Interview :c3, after c2, 7d
Final Interview :c4, after c3, 5d
section Closing
Offer :d1, after c4, 3d
Negotiation :d2, after d1, 5d
Acceptance :d3, after d2, 3d
Reference: references/recruitment_best_practices.md
Key Recruitment Metrics:
| Metric | Definition | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Fill | Days from job posting to acceptance | < 45 days |
| Time to Hire | Days from first contact to acceptance | < 30 days |
| Cost per Hire | Total recruitment cost / hires | Industry benchmark |
| Quality of Hire | Performance rating at 6/12 months | > 3.5/5.0 |
| Offer Acceptance Rate | Accepted offers / total offers | > 85% |
| Source Effectiveness | Hires per source / cost per source | Track by channel |
Budget Template:
| Category | Item | Unit Cost | Quantity | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advertising | Job boards | $X | Y posts | $XY |
| Sourcing | LinkedIn Recruiter | $X/month | Y months | $XY |
| Agency Fees | Contingency (20%) | $X × 0.20 | Y hires | $XY |
| Assessment | Tools/tests | $X/candidate | Y candidates | $XY |
| Interview | Expenses | $X | Y candidates | $XY |
| Total | $XXXX |
Use this workflow to create structured interview processes with objective evaluation criteria.
Design a multi-stage interview process:
| Stage | Purpose | Duration | Interviewers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phone Screen | Basic qualifications, motivation | 20-30 min | Recruiter |
| Technical Interview | Skills assessment | 45-60 min | Hiring Manager + Technical |
| Behavioral Interview | Culture fit, competencies | 45-60 min | HR + Team Lead |
| Final Interview | Executive alignment | 30-45 min | Senior Leadership |
Reference: references/interview_methodology.md
STAR Method Framework:
For each competency, prepare questions that elicit STAR responses:
## Competency: Problem Solving
**Question**: Tell me about a time when you faced a complex problem with no clear solution.
**STAR Components to Listen For:**
- **Situation**: Context and complexity of the problem
- **Task**: Their specific responsibility
- **Action**: Steps they took to solve it
- **Result**: Outcome and learnings
**Behavioral Indicators (1-5 scale):**
1. Cannot provide clear example
2. Basic problem identification
3. Logical approach with some structure
4. Systematic analysis with creative solutions
5. Strategic thinking with measurable impact
Create a scoring matrix:
| Competency | Weight | 1-Poor | 2-Below | 3-Meets | 4-Exceeds | 5-Exceptional |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical Skills | 30% | Lacks basics | Some gaps | Meets requirements | Strong skills | Expert level |
| Problem Solving | 25% | No examples | Weak approach | Logical process | Creative solutions | Strategic impact |
| Communication | 20% | Unclear | Occasionally unclear | Clear and concise | Excellent clarity | Inspiring communicator |
| Leadership | 15% | None shown | Limited | Some initiative | Strong influence | Transforms teams |
| Culture Fit | 10% | Misaligned | Partial fit | Good alignment | Strong alignment | Culture enhancer |
Use template: assets/interview_evaluation_sheet_ja.md or assets/interview_evaluation_sheet_en.md
Evaluation Sheet Sections:
Candidate Information
Technical/Skill Assessment
Competency Assessment
Red Flags / Concerns
Overall Recommendation
Interview Debrief Agenda:
Independent Scoring First (5 min)
Round Robin Feedback (15 min)
Discussion & Calibration (10 min)
Final Decision (5 min)
Use this workflow to create comprehensive onboarding programs for new hires.
Checklist (Before Day 1):
| Category | Task | Owner | Due Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Administration | |||
| Employment contract signed | HR | -5 days | |
| Background check completed | HR | -3 days | |
| Payroll setup | Finance | -1 day | |
| IT Setup | |||
| Laptop/equipment ordered | IT | -10 days | |
| Email account created | IT | -3 days | |
| Access permissions configured | IT | -1 day | |
| Software licenses assigned | IT | -1 day | |
| Workspace | |||
| Desk/workspace assigned | Facilities | -5 days | |
| Welcome kit prepared | HR | -1 day | |
| Business cards ordered | Admin | -7 days | |
| Communication | |||
| Welcome email sent | HR | -3 days | |
| Team notified | Hiring Manager | -3 days | |
| Buddy assigned | Hiring Manager | -5 days |
Use template: assets/onboarding_plan_template_ja.md or assets/onboarding_plan_template_en.md
Sample Day 1 Agenda:
| Time | Activity | Owner | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09:00-09:30 | Welcome & Building Tour | HR | Lobby |
| 09:30-10:30 | Paperwork & Policy Review | HR | HR Office |
| 10:30-11:00 | IT Setup & Security | IT | Desk |
| 11:00-12:00 | Company Overview Presentation | HR | Conference Room |
| 12:00-13:00 | Team Lunch | Hiring Manager | TBD |
| 13:00-14:00 | Department Introduction | Hiring Manager | Team Area |
| 14:00-15:00 | Role & Expectations Discussion | Hiring Manager | Office |
| 15:00-16:00 | System Access & Training | Buddy | Desk |
| 16:00-17:00 | First Assignment & Questions | Hiring Manager | Office |
Phase 1: Learning (Days 1-30)
| Week | Focus Area | Key Activities | Success Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orientation | Meet team, understand structure, setup tools | Completed onboarding checklist |
| 2 | Learning | Shadow meetings, read documentation, training | Passed required training |
| 3 | Exploration | Understand workflows, identify stakeholders | Map of key processes |
| 4 | Integration | Attend team meetings, contribute to discussions | Active participation observed |
Phase 2: Contributing (Days 31-60)
| Week | Focus Area | Key Activities | Success Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-6 | Small Wins | Complete first independent tasks | Delivered first output |
| 7-8 | Building | Take on increasing responsibility | Positive feedback from team |
Phase 3: Performing (Days 61-90)
| Week | Focus Area | Key Activities | Success Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9-10 | Ownership | Own projects or processes | Managing work independently |
| 11-12 | Impact | Deliver measurable results | Met initial performance goals |
Support Network:
| Role | Person | Responsibility | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mentor | [Senior colleague] | Career guidance, skill development | Weekly 1:1 |
| Buddy | [Peer colleague] | Day-to-day questions, cultural navigation | Daily check-ins (Week 1-2) |
| Manager | [Hiring Manager] | Performance, goals, feedback | Weekly 1:1 |
| HR Partner | [HR Business Partner] | Policy questions, concerns | As needed |
Formal Check-ins:
| Timing | Owner | Focus | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | HR | Administrative completion | Onboarding checklist signed |
| Week 1 | Manager | First impressions, questions | Adjust plan if needed |
| Day 30 | Manager + HR | 30-day review | Progress report |
| Day 60 | Manager | Mid-point check | Course correction |
| Day 90 | Manager + HR | Probation review | Performance confirmation |
| Template | Language | Use For |
|---|---|---|
job_description_template_ja.md | Japanese | JD creation (domestic) |
job_description_template_en.md | English | JD creation (global) |
interview_evaluation_sheet_ja.md | Japanese | Interview evaluation (domestic) |
interview_evaluation_sheet_en.md | English | Interview evaluation (global) |
onboarding_plan_template_ja.md | Japanese | Onboarding program (domestic) |
onboarding_plan_template_en.md | English | Onboarding program (global) |
| Example | Description |
|---|---|
software_engineer_jd.md | Software Engineer JD with technical competencies |
sales_representative_jd.md | Sales position with commercial competencies |
engineering_manager_jd.md | Manager role with leadership competencies |
| Guide | Content |
|---|---|
competency_model_guide.md | Competency framework design methodology |
interview_methodology.md | STAR method, structured interview best practices |
recruitment_best_practices.md | Sourcing, metrics, candidate experience |
| Issue | Possible Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Too many unqualified applicants | JD requirements unclear | Clarify must-haves, add screening questions |
| Candidates declining offers | Slow process, poor experience | Reduce time-to-hire, improve communication |
| High early turnover | Role mismatch, poor onboarding | Realistic job previews, structured onboarding |
| Interview bias | Unstructured interviews | Use competency-based questions, diverse panels |
| New hire underperformance | Unclear expectations | Clear 30-60-90 plan, regular feedback |
Context: Series A startup needs to hire 5 engineers in Q1
How This Skill Helps:
Context: Fortune 500 company hiring Engineering Manager
How This Skill Helps:
Context: Japanese company opening US office
How This Skill Helps:
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Track and update action item status from natural language updates like 'Seanのメールには返信しておいた' or 'Lu対応予定'. Integrates with daily-comms-ops workflow. Use when managing action items across communication channels.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AI活用提案の専門コンサルタントスキル。LLM・AIエージェントの活用事例知識を基に、業界別、部門別、シーン別に最適なAI導入提案を行います。システム化、業務改善、効率化を得意とし、具体的な活用事例、期待効果、導入ステップを含む実践的な提案を提供します。Use when proposing AI/LLM adoption strategies for specific industries, departments, or business scenarios.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate AI-powered BPO service proposals for Japanese companies in the US market. Use when creating outsourcing proposals with AI service menus, ROI estimation, implementation roadmaps, and bilingual (JA/EN) proposal documents for 在米日系企業向けAI実装.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AI(LLM)が生成した日本語テキストの「AI臭」を検出・診断し、人間らしい文章にリライトするスキル。 Use when: 「AIっぽい文章を直して」「人間らしくリライトして」「AI臭を消して」「この文章をもっと自然にして」 「テキストのAI感を減らして」「機械っぽさを取りたい」 "make this sound more human", "remove AI tone", "humanize this text", "detect if this is AI-generated". 6つのAI特有パターン(視覚的マーカー、単調なリズム、マニュアル的構成、非コミット姿勢、抽象語の濫用、 定型メタファー)を正規表現ベースで検出し、0-100のAI臭スコアを算出。3つの人間化技法 (バランスを崩す・客観を崩す・論理を崩す)でリライトを実行する。 Note: 検出スクリプトは日本語テキスト専用。英語テキストの場合はClaude自身がreferences/を参照して分析・リライトする。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate audit-ready internal control design documents from As-Is business process inventories. Produces control IDs, assertion mappings, procedures, SoD analysis, KPIs, materiality thresholds, and implementation roadmaps. Use when building internal controls for new audit engagements, SOX/J-SOX compliance, or process improvement initiatives.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review audit-related documents (control design documents, bottleneck analyses, requirements definitions, etc.) for quality, scoring them 0-100 with a severity-rated findings list. Use when reviewing audit documents, checking control design quality, or verifying cross-document consistency. Supports documents governed by US GAAP, IFRS, or J-GAAP.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.