Track and update action item status from natural language updates like 'Seanのメールには返信しておいた' or 'Lu対応予定'. Integrates with daily-comms-ops workflow. Use when managing action items across communication channels.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
This skill should be used when developing code using Test-Driven Development (TDD) methodology. Use this skill when the user wants to write tests first before implementation, needs guidance on the red-green-refactor cycle, or explicitly requests TDD-style development. Triggers include requests like "develop this feature using TDD", "write tests first", "help me with test-driven development", or "implement this following TDD practices". The skill guides through writing failing tests, implementing minimal code to pass, and refactoring while maintaining test coverage.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
This skill provides comprehensive guidance for Test-Driven Development, a methodology where tests are written before implementation code. TDD promotes better design, higher code quality, and fewer defects through the disciplined practice of the red-green-refactor cycle.
Before writing any test:
Ask clarifying questions such as:
For each test case, follow this cycle:
def test_calculate_discount_for_premium_member():
# Arrange
calculator = PriceCalculator()
member = Member(tier="premium")
price = 100.0
# Act
result = calculator.calculate_discount(price, member)
# Assert
assert result == 20.0 # 20% discount
def calculate_discount(self, price, member):
if member.tier == "premium":
return price * 0.20
return 0
def calculate_discount(self, price, member):
discount_rates = {
"premium": 0.20,
"gold": 0.15,
"silver": 0.10,
"standard": 0.05,
}
rate = discount_rates.get(member.tier, 0)
return price * rate
After each successful cycle, commit the changes:
Use descriptive names that communicate intent:
should_return_zero_when_list_is_emptygivenPremiumMember_whenCalculateDiscount_thenReturns20PercentcreateUser_withValidInput_savesToDatabaseEach test should:
Always consider:
For similar test cases with different values:
@pytest.mark.parametrize("tier,expected_rate", [
("premium", 0.20),
("gold", 0.15),
("silver", 0.10),
("standard", 0.05),
])
def test_discount_rates(tier, expected_rate):
member = Member(tier=tier)
result = calculator.calculate_discount(100, member)
assert result == expected_rate * 100
When implementation is unclear:
When solution is clear:
Select the appropriate framework based on language:
For detailed methodology and patterns, load these reference files as needed:
references/tdd_methodology.md: Complete TDD methodology including the Three Laws of TDD, Red-Green-Refactor cycle details, cycle timing, and common pitfalls to avoid
references/test_patterns.md: Test patterns and techniques including triangulation, parameterized tests, test data builders, mocking patterns, and async testing
Load tdd_methodology.md when:
Load test_patterns.md when:
User request: "Create a function to validate email addresses using TDD"
Test cases for email validation:
1. Valid email returns true
2. Missing @ returns false
3. Missing domain returns false
4. Missing local part returns false
5. Multiple @ symbols returns false
6. Empty string returns false
7. None/null returns false
RED:
def test_valid_email_returns_true():
result = validate_email("user@example.com")
assert result is True
GREEN:
def validate_email(email):
return True # Minimal implementation
REFACTOR: No changes needed yet.
RED:
def test_missing_at_symbol_returns_false():
result = validate_email("userexample.com")
assert result is False
GREEN:
def validate_email(email):
return "@" in email
REFACTOR: Still simple, no changes needed.
Continue through remaining test cases, letting the implementation emerge from the tests. The final implementation will be well-tested and handle all edge cases.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Track and update action item status from natural language updates like 'Seanのメールには返信しておいた' or 'Lu対応予定'. Integrates with daily-comms-ops workflow. Use when managing action items across communication channels.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AI活用提案の専門コンサルタントスキル。LLM・AIエージェントの活用事例知識を基に、業界別、部門別、シーン別に最適なAI導入提案を行います。システム化、業務改善、効率化を得意とし、具体的な活用事例、期待効果、導入ステップを含む実践的な提案を提供します。Use when proposing AI/LLM adoption strategies for specific industries, departments, or business scenarios.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate AI-powered BPO service proposals for Japanese companies in the US market. Use when creating outsourcing proposals with AI service menus, ROI estimation, implementation roadmaps, and bilingual (JA/EN) proposal documents for 在米日系企業向けAI実装.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AI(LLM)が生成した日本語テキストの「AI臭」を検出・診断し、人間らしい文章にリライトするスキル。 Use when: 「AIっぽい文章を直して」「人間らしくリライトして」「AI臭を消して」「この文章をもっと自然にして」 「テキストのAI感を減らして」「機械っぽさを取りたい」 "make this sound more human", "remove AI tone", "humanize this text", "detect if this is AI-generated". 6つのAI特有パターン(視覚的マーカー、単調なリズム、マニュアル的構成、非コミット姿勢、抽象語の濫用、 定型メタファー)を正規表現ベースで検出し、0-100のAI臭スコアを算出。3つの人間化技法 (バランスを崩す・客観を崩す・論理を崩す)でリライトを実行する。 Note: 検出スクリプトは日本語テキスト専用。英語テキストの場合はClaude自身がreferences/を参照して分析・リライトする。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate audit-ready internal control design documents from As-Is business process inventories. Produces control IDs, assertion mappings, procedures, SoD analysis, KPIs, materiality thresholds, and implementation roadmaps. Use when building internal controls for new audit engagements, SOX/J-SOX compliance, or process improvement initiatives.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review audit-related documents (control design documents, bottleneck analyses, requirements definitions, etc.) for quality, scoring them 0-100 with a severity-rated findings list. Use when reviewing audit documents, checking control design quality, or verifying cross-document consistency. Supports documents governed by US GAAP, IFRS, or J-GAAP.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.