본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

tech-decision

This skill should be used when the user asks about "technical decision", "what to use", "A vs B", "comparison analysis", "library selection", "architecture decision", "which one to use", "tradeoffs", "tech selection", "implementation approach", or needs deep analysis for technical decisions. Provides systematic multi-source research and synthesized recommendations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

연동 도구Reddit
설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(3)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB
  • references/evaluation-criteria.md4.9 KB
  • references/report-template.md4.5 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Tech Decision - Deep Technical Decision Analysis

Skill for systematically analyzing technical decisions and deriving comprehensive conclusions.

Core Principle

Conclusion First: All reports present conclusion first, then provide evidence.

Use Cases

  • Library/framework selection (React vs Vue, Prisma vs TypeORM)
  • Architecture pattern decisions (Monolith vs Microservices, REST vs GraphQL)
  • Implementation approach selection (Server-side vs Client-side, Polling vs WebSocket)
  • Tech stack decisions (language, database, infrastructure, etc.)

Decision Workflow

Phase 1: Problem Definition

Clarify decision topic and context:

  1. Identify Topic: What needs to be decided?
  2. Identify Options: What are the choices to compare?
  3. Establish Criteria: What criteria to evaluate by?
    • Performance, learning curve, ecosystem, maintainability, cost, etc.
    • Set priority based on project characteristics
    • See references/evaluation-criteria.md for detailed criteria

Phase 2: Parallel Information Gathering

Gather information from multiple sources simultaneously. Must run in parallel:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  Run simultaneously (parallel with Task tool)               │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  1. codebase-explorer agent                                 │
│     → Analyze existing codebase, identify patterns/constraints│
│                                                             │
│  2. docs-researcher agent                                   │
│     → Research official docs, guides, best practices        │
│                                                             │
│  3. Skill: dev-scan                                         │
│     → Gather community opinions (Reddit, HN, Dev.to, etc.)  │
│                                                             │
│  4. Skill: agent-council                                    │
│     → Gather various AI expert perspectives                 │
│                                                             │
│  5. [Optional] Context7 MCP                                 │
│     → Query latest docs per library                         │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Phase 3: Synthesis Analysis

Run tradeoff-analyzer agent with gathered information:

  • Organize pros/cons per option
  • Score by evaluation criteria
  • Organize conflicting opinions
  • Evaluate reliability (source-based)

Phase 4: Final Report Generation

Generate conclusion-first comprehensive report with decision-synthesizer agent (detailed template: references/report-template.md):

# Technical Decision Report: [Topic]

## Conclusion (Executive Summary)
**Recommendation: [Option X]**
[1-2 sentence key reason]

## Evaluation Criteria and Weights
| Criteria | Weight | Description |
|------|--------|------|
| Performance | 30% | ... |
| Learning Curve | 20% | ... |

## Option Analysis

### Option A: [Name]
**Pros:**
- [Pro 1] (Source: official docs)
- [Pro 2] (Source: Reddit r/webdev)

**Cons:**
- [Con 1] (Source: HN discussion)

**Good fit for:** [Scenario]

## Comprehensive Comparison
| Criteria | Option A | Option B | Option C |
|------|----------|----------|----------|
| Performance | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| **Total** | **X pts** | **Y pts** | **Z pts** |

## Recommendation Rationale
1. [Key reason 1 with source]
2. [Key reason 2 with source]

## Risks and Considerations
- [Consideration 1]
- [Consideration 2]

Resources Used

Agents (this plugin)

AgentRole
codebase-explorerAnalyze existing codebase, identify patterns/constraints
docs-researcherResearch official docs, guides, best practices
tradeoff-analyzerOrganize pros/cons, comparative analysis
decision-synthesizerGenerate conclusion-first final report

Existing Skills (call via Skill tool)

SkillPurposeHow to Call
dev-scanCommunity opinions from Reddit, HN, Dev.toSkill: dev-scan
agent-councilGather various AI expert perspectivesSkill: agent-council

Quick Execution Guide

1. Simple Comparison (A vs B)

User: "React vs Vue which is better?"

Execute:
1. Task docs-researcher + Task codebase-explorer (parallel)
2. Skill: dev-scan
3. Task tradeoff-analyzer
4. Task decision-synthesizer

2. Deep Analysis (complex decision)

User: "Thinking about which state management library to use"

Execute:
1. Task codebase-explorer (analyze current state)
2. Parallel:
   - Task docs-researcher (Redux, Zustand, Jotai, Recoil, etc.)
   - Skill: dev-scan
   - Skill: agent-council
3. Task tradeoff-analyzer
4. Task decision-synthesizer

Notes

  1. Provide Context: More accurate analysis with project characteristics, team size, existing tech stack
  2. Confirm Criteria: First confirm what criteria matter to user
  3. Show Reliability: Mark unclear or outdated sources
  4. Conclusion First: Always present conclusion first

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Analyze an open-source project from What/Why perspective (not how-it's-implemented). Use when the user says "/analyze-oss", "분석해줘 이 오픈소스", "이 레포 뭐하는거야", "analyze this repo", "what does X do", "이거 왜 쓰는거야", "이 라이브러리 분석", provides a GitHub URL and wants understanding, or asks to deeply understand an OSS project's purpose, value, target users, and usage flow. Clones the repo to ~/opensource-analysis/<repo-name>/ (git pull if already exists), dispatches parallel subagents per analysis lens, then synthesizes a What/Why-focused report in chat. Supports optional user-specific follow-up questions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

team-attention/hoyeon1732026년 5월 21일 업데이트

blueprint

무료

"/blueprint", "blueprint", "task graph", "contract derivation", "execution plan", "plan tasks from requirements", "contract-first planning" Turn requirements.md into an executable blueprint (plan.json + contracts.md). Five phases: Contracts → Tasks → Journeys → Verify Plan → Commit. Sits between /specify and /execute. Scope-adaptive (greenfield → bugfix). Uses hoyeon-cli (plan.json only; requirements.md is read as-is via Read tool).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

team-attention/hoyeon1732026년 5월 21일 업데이트

Recon-first browser automation. Orchestrator explores the site first via chromux, saves a guide file with insights, then delegates execution to browser-explorer agent. Use when: "/browser-work", "브라우저 작업", "사이트에서 해줘", "웹에서 해줘", "LinkedIn에서", "크롬으로", "browser task", "automate this site".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

team-attention/hoyeon1732026년 5월 21일 업데이트

bugfix

무료

Root cause based one-shot bug fix. debugger diagnosis → requirements.md generation → /execute. /bugfix "error description" Full investigation pipeline: debugger + gap-analyzer + standard verify. QA suggestion after successful fix.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

team-attention/hoyeon1732026년 5월 21일 업데이트

check

무료

This skill should be used when the user wants to verify their changes before pushing, or update the project's rule checklists. Phase 1: validate changed files against .hoyeon/rules/ checklists and report PASS/WARN. Phase 2 (conditional): propose rule additions when unmatched patterns are detected. Essential before git push. Trigger phrases: "check", "checklist", "verify changes", "what did I miss", "pre-push check", "cascading changes", "any more changes needed", "update checklist", "update rules", "rules update", "체크", "체크리스트", "변경 확인", "빠뜨린 거 없나", "push 전 확인", "뭐 더 건드려야 해?", "연쇄 변경 확인", "규칙 갱신".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

team-attention/hoyeon1732026년 5월 21일 업데이트

clarify

무료

"/clarify", "clarify this", "keep asking until clear", "remove ambiguity", "clarify requirements", "clarify design", "clarify the plan", "질문 계속해", "모호한 게 없게", "명확해질 때까지", "계속 물어봐", "Q&A로 정리", "질문답변 기록", "요구사항 명확화", "설계 명확화". Relentless ambiguity-resolution interview that records Q&A under .hoyeon/clarify/<topic>/ and hands off to specify/blueprint/docs when clear.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

team-attention/hoyeon1732026년 5월 21일 업데이트

team-attention의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고