본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

cost-tracking

Track and report Claude Code token usage, spending, and budgets from a local cost-tracking database. Use when the user asks about costs, spending, usage, tokens, budgets, or cost breakdowns by project, tool, session, or date.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.4 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Cost Tracking

Use this skill to analyze Claude Code cost and usage history from a local SQLite database. It is intended for users who already have a cost-tracking hook or plugin writing usage rows to ~/.claude-cost-tracker/usage.db.

Source: salvaged from stale community PR #1304 by MayurBhavsar.

When to Use

  • The user asks "how much have I spent?", "what did this session cost?", or "what is my token usage?"
  • The user mentions budgets, spending limits, overruns, or cost controls.
  • The user wants a cost breakdown by project, tool, session, model, or date.
  • The user wants to compare today against yesterday or inspect a recent trend.
  • The user asks for a CSV export of recent usage records.

How It Works

First verify prerequisites:

command -v sqlite3 >/dev/null && echo "sqlite3 available" || echo "sqlite3 missing"
test -f ~/.claude-cost-tracker/usage.db && echo "Database found" || echo "Database not found"

If the database is missing, do not fabricate usage data. Tell the user that cost tracking is not configured and suggest installing or enabling a trusted local cost-tracking hook/plugin.

The expected usage table usually contains one row per tool call or model interaction. Column names vary by tracker, but the examples below assume:

ColumnMeaning
timestampISO timestamp for the usage event
projectProject or repository name
tool_nameTool or event name
input_tokensInput token count, when recorded
output_tokensOutput token count, when recorded
cost_usdPrecomputed cost in USD
session_idClaude Code session identifier
modelModel used for the event

Prefer cost_usd over hand-calculating pricing. Model prices and cache pricing change over time, and the tracker should be the source of truth for how each row was priced.

Examples

Quick Summary

sqlite3 ~/.claude-cost-tracker/usage.db "
  SELECT
    'Today: $' || ROUND(COALESCE(SUM(CASE WHEN date(timestamp) = date('now') THEN cost_usd END), 0), 4) ||
    ' | Total: $' || ROUND(COALESCE(SUM(cost_usd), 0), 4) ||
    ' | Calls: ' || COUNT(*) ||
    ' | Sessions: ' || COUNT(DISTINCT session_id)
  FROM usage;
"

Cost By Project

sqlite3 -header -column ~/.claude-cost-tracker/usage.db "
  SELECT project, ROUND(SUM(cost_usd), 4) AS cost, COUNT(*) AS calls
  FROM usage
  GROUP BY project
  ORDER BY cost DESC;
"

Cost By Tool

sqlite3 -header -column ~/.claude-cost-tracker/usage.db "
  SELECT tool_name, ROUND(SUM(cost_usd), 4) AS cost, COUNT(*) AS calls
  FROM usage
  GROUP BY tool_name
  ORDER BY cost DESC;
"

Last Seven Days

sqlite3 -header -column ~/.claude-cost-tracker/usage.db "
  SELECT date(timestamp) AS date, ROUND(SUM(cost_usd), 4) AS cost, COUNT(*) AS calls
  FROM usage
  GROUP BY date(timestamp)
  ORDER BY date DESC
  LIMIT 7;
"

Session Drilldown

sqlite3 -header -column ~/.claude-cost-tracker/usage.db "
  SELECT session_id,
    MIN(timestamp) AS started,
    MAX(timestamp) AS ended,
    ROUND(SUM(cost_usd), 4) AS cost,
    COUNT(*) AS calls
  FROM usage
  GROUP BY session_id
  ORDER BY started DESC
  LIMIT 10;
"

Reporting Guidance

When presenting cost data, include:

  1. Today's spend and yesterday comparison.
  2. Total spend across the tracked database.
  3. Top projects ranked by cost.
  4. Top tools ranked by cost.
  5. Session count and average cost per session when enough data exists.

For small amounts, format currency with four decimal places. For larger amounts, two decimals are enough.

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not estimate costs from raw token counts when cost_usd is present.
  • Do not assume the database exists without checking.
  • Do not run unbounded SELECT * exports on large databases.
  • Do not hard-code current model pricing in user-facing answers.
  • Do not recommend installing unreviewed hooks or plugins that execute arbitrary code.

Related

  • /cost-report - Command-form report using the same database.
  • cost-aware-llm-pipeline - Model-routing and budget-design patterns.
  • token-budget-advisor - Context and token-budget planning.
  • strategic-compact - Context compaction to reduce repeated token spend.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tensology/decisionsai172026년 10월 15일 업데이트

Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tensology/decisionsai172026년 10월 15일 업데이트

Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tensology/decisionsai172026년 10월 15일 업데이트

Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tensology/decisionsai172026년 10월 15일 업데이트

One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tensology/decisionsai172026년 10월 15일 업데이트

One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tensology/decisionsai172026년 10월 15일 업데이트

tensology의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고