본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

dynamic-workflow-mode

Design task-local harnesses, eval gates, and reusable skill extraction for Claude dynamic workflow mode and other adaptive agent harnesses.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md5.1 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Dynamic Workflow Mode

Use this skill when a coding agent can generate or adapt a task-local harness instead of only following a static command flow. The goal is to turn dynamic workflow mode into a disciplined system: temporary harnesses for one-off work, shared skill extraction for repeated work, and observable control pane checkpoints for teams.

When To Activate

  • The user mentions dynamic workflows, custom harnesses, harness-per-task, adaptive workflows, or Claude Code dynamic workflow mode.
  • A task needs a custom loop, evaluator, crawler, fixture generator, watcher, or local dashboard.
  • Multiple agents need the same repeatable process but the process is not yet captured as a shared skill.
  • A workflow needs durable handoff artifacts, eval evidence, or operator approval before merge.

Core Contract

Dynamic workflow mode should produce a task-local harness only when the harness is cheaper and safer than manually driving the same steps. The harness must have:

  • Objective: the outcome it owns and the outcome it explicitly does not own.
  • Inputs: files, URLs, prompts, data sources, credentials policy, and user-provided constraints.
  • Outputs: commits, reports, screenshots, status files, or control pane snapshots.
  • Eval: at least one pass/fail check tied to the task, not only "it ran".
  • Handoff: a short artifact that tells the next operator what happened, what is blocked, and how to resume.

Dynamic Harness Decision Tree

  1. One-shot task: keep it inline. Do not invent a harness.
  2. Repeated task with changing inputs: create a task-local harness and keep it under a temp or project-local working area.
  3. Repeated task across teammates or repos: extract the pattern into a shared skill.
  4. Task with external state, queueing, or approvals: add control pane visibility before adding more automation.
  5. Task with safety risk: add an eval gate and a human merge gate before autonomous execution.

Task-Local Harness Template

Use this structure before writing code:

# Dynamic Workflow Harness

Objective:
- Ship:
- Do not ship:

Inputs:
- Repo or workspace:
- External systems:
- Credentials policy:

Loop:
1. Discover current state.
2. Generate or update the smallest useful artifact.
3. Run eval checks.
4. Record status and handoff.
5. Stop on failed gate, unclear ownership, or unsafe external action.

Eval:
- Command:
- Expected pass signal:
- Failure owner:

Handoff:
- Status:
- Evidence:
- Next action:

Shared Skill Extraction

Promote a task-local harness into a shared skill only when at least two of these are true:

  • The same workflow appears in multiple sessions, repos, teams, or launches.
  • The workflow needs specific language, tool, or safety sequencing.
  • Failures repeat because operators skip a gate or lose context.
  • The workflow has a stable input/output contract.
  • The workflow benefits from a control pane, status board, or team handoff.

When extracting, write the skill first in skills/<name>/SKILL.md. Add command shims only if a legacy slash-entry surface is still required.

Control Pane Checkpoints

Dynamic workflow mode becomes team-usable when it exposes state. Record these checkpoints whenever the task spans more than one session:

  • Plan: objective, owner, acceptance criteria, and risky external systems.
  • Queue: work items, assigned agent role, branch/worktree, and dependency edges.
  • Run: active harness, current loop step, recent eval result, and token/cost signal if available.
  • Gate: test results, browser screenshots, security review, and merge readiness.
  • Handoff: what is done, what failed, what needs a human decision.

If the repo has ECC2 state enabled, prefer adding or reading checkpoints through the ECC control pane or state-store-backed scripts instead of scattering untracked notes.

Eval Gates

Every dynamic harness needs a task-specific eval. Pick the cheapest reliable gate:

Work TypeEval Gate
Code featureFocused test, lint, coverage, and one integration path
UI/control paneBrowser smoke with screenshot and overflow/error checks
Agent workflowFixture transcript or seeded work item with expected routing
Research/contentSource-neutral brief, claim checklist, and publish-ready outline
IntegrationDry-run command, config validation, and no-secret scan

Do not claim a dynamic workflow is reusable until the eval can be rerun by another teammate.

Anti-Patterns

  • Generating scripts that hide the real decision logic from the operator.
  • Treating dynamic workflow mode as permission to skip tests.
  • Creating one-off docs when a shared skill or status artifact is the real product.
  • Running multiple agents without ownership, merge gate, or conflict policy.
  • Letting raw private research data leak into public docs.

Output Standard

Finish with:

  • The harness or skill path.
  • The eval commands and results.
  • The control pane or handoff artifact path.
  • The next reusable extraction candidate.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tensology/decisionsai172026년 10월 15일 업데이트

Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tensology/decisionsai172026년 10월 15일 업데이트

Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tensology/decisionsai172026년 10월 15일 업데이트

Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tensology/decisionsai172026년 10월 15일 업데이트

One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tensology/decisionsai172026년 10월 15일 업데이트

One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tensology/decisionsai172026년 10월 15일 업데이트

tensology의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고