Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Canonical UX and UI principles for every interface. Read before planning, building, reviewing, or testing any user-facing screen, flow, modal, form, or component.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
This skill is the source of truth for interface behavior and presentation. Read the current version before building or changing any UI. Other skills may add domain or aesthetic guidance, but they must reference these principles and cannot override them unless the user explicitly requests an exception.
Polish, clean up, audit, and make this better do not authorize a redesign.prefers-reduced-motion without replacing one long animation with another.Save customer, Book the call, Reload this page.OK, Yes, Submit, filler, repeated helper text, and context-free errors.Every element must earn its place. If removing it loses no function or necessary meaning, remove it.
Save customer.Manage your items with ease. Labels are short and functional.OK, Submit, or Yes. Cancel is on the left, the primary action is on the right, and destructive actions use destructive styling.alert() or confirm().Older skill references to Fix Memory mean this process.
taste-log.md alongside this document.taste-log.md.audit the UI/UX of a project, apply this skill together with Impeccable, Apple design standards, accessibility review, source inspection, and current rendered desktop/mobile evidence.Older skill references to the Pre-ship Check mean this section.
A UI task is not complete until every relevant item passes:
alert() or confirm() is used.Recommended review widths are 1440x900, a representative width from 980px to 1120px, and 390x844.
| Date | What went wrong | Rule added or changed |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-14 | Interaction behavior and visual presentation were combined in one rule set. | Split the source of truth into separate UX Principles and UI Principles. |
| 2026-10-14 | Titles, labels, information, and actions could be repeated across one screen. | Added No duplication rules and the removal test. |
| 2026-10-14 | Decorative filler, wrapper soup, and unsolicited widgets made interfaces look generated rather than intentional. | Added No bloat rules requiring every element to earn its place. |
| 2026-10-14 | CRUD views could collapse into hybrid list, detail, and form screens. | Added One screen, one job and a fixed CRUD flow. |
| 2026-10-14 | UI corrections were fixed locally but did not reliably change future behavior. | Added Fix Memory, the Pre-ship Check, and a required changelog entry for principle changes. |
| 2026-10-14 | Product-specific visual taste was implicit across exemplar projects rather than available as standing guidance. | Added Design Principles and replaced the narrow pre-ship questions with Definition of Done - UI. |
| 2026-10-14 | Foreground/background mismatches and partially styled dark-mode components could pass broad token or contrast checks while remaining visibly broken. | Added color-pairing, semantic-token, full-state theme coverage, and release-blocking theme-completeness rules. |
| 2026-10-19 | UI polish requests repeatedly changed unrelated navigation, shells, labels, and workflows or filled unclear gaps with invented product behavior. | Added Preserve product truth and prohibited speculative product semantics, data, and controls. |
| 2026-10-19 | Builds and representative screenshots were treated as completion while requested items, roles, states, routes, or responsive layouts remained unchecked. | Added line-by-line request reconciliation and a route-role-permission-state-viewport coverage matrix to Definition of Done. |
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.