본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

atlas-migrations

Authors and runs Atlas database schema migrations - declarative HCL or SQL schema definition with `atlas schema apply` for desired-state apply OR `atlas migrate diff` to generate versioned migrations against a dev DB; `atlas migrate apply` to deploy; `atlas migrate lint` to flag destructive / locking / data-loss patterns; `atlas migrate hash` to detect tampering. Supports PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server, ClickHouse, SQLite, MariaDB, Snowflake, Oracle, Redshift, Spanner, CockroachDB, Databricks. Use when the user wants Terraform-style declarative DB schema management or modern SQL-first migration linting beyond Flyway / Liquibase.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa스타 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(4)

  • SKILL.md7.1 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json767 B
  • references/atlas-caveats.md1.4 KB
  • references/hcl-schema.md1.2 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

atlas-migrations

Overview

Atlas manages and migrates database schemas as code - define the desired schema and Atlas plans, lints, tests, and applies the changes (per atlasgo.io/getting-started). Two operating modes:

  1. Declarative - define desired state in HCL or SQL; Atlas computes diff and applies (atlas schema apply).
  2. Versioned - Atlas generates timestamped migration files from schema diffs (atlas migrate diff); migrations apply forward (atlas migrate apply).

Most production teams use versioned mode for the audit trail; dev loops often use declarative mode for fast iteration.

How to use

Follow Steps 1-9 in order - lint (Step 6) is the gate before apply (Step 5).

Step 1 - Install

Per at-start:

# Homebrew (macOS / Linux)
brew install ariga/tap/atlas

# Docker: nothing to install, mount the migrations directory
docker run --rm --net=host -v "$(pwd)/migrations:/migrations" \
  arigaio/atlas migrate apply --url "$DATABASE_URL"

In GitHub Actions, uses: ariga/setup-atlas@v0 puts the CLI on the runner (Step 8, per at-gha). The getting-started page also lists per-platform binaries with md5 and sha256 checksums; verify the checksum before running a downloaded binary. Prefer these over piping the vendor install script into a shell, which runs unreviewed remote code.

Step 2 - Define schema

Per at-start, schema can be SQL (most common) or HCL. SQL example (PostgreSQL):

-- schema.sql
CREATE TABLE users (
  id serial PRIMARY KEY,
  name varchar(255) NOT NULL,
  email varchar(255) UNIQUE NOT NULL,
  created_at timestamptz DEFAULT now()
);

For the same schema expressed in Atlas's HCL DSL and guidance on when HCL vs SQL matters, see references/hcl-schema.md.

The dev DB referenced via --dev-url is a temporary scratch database Atlas uses to compute the diff (Atlas applies the desired state to the scratch DB, then computes the migration vs production).

Step 3 - Apply schema (declarative mode)

Per at-start:

atlas schema apply --url "$DATABASE_URL" --to file://schema.sql \
  --dev-url "docker://postgres/17/dev?search_path=public"

--url = target DB; --to = desired schema definition; --dev-url = scratch DB for diff computation. Atlas prints the planned changes and prompts for confirmation by default.

Step 4 - Generate versioned migrations

Per at-start:

atlas migrate diff initial --to file://schema.sql \
  --dev-url "docker://postgres/17/dev?search_path=public"

This generates a timestamped migration file in migrations/ (e.g., 20260506120000_initial.sql). Subsequent calls with a new schema generate new migrations against the previous state.

Step 5 - Apply versioned migrations

Verify (gate before applying): run Step 6 lint first and assert it reports no destructive / data-loss findings; if it flags one, fix the migration (add a DEFAULT, split the change, or add a new migration) and re-run lint until clean. Only then apply:

atlas migrate apply --url "$DATABASE_URL"

Atlas tracks state in atlas_schema_revisions table - each applied migration is recorded with its hash, so tampering is detected on subsequent applies.

Step 6 - Lint migrations

Per at-start:

atlas migrate lint --dev-url "..." --latest 1

Lints the most recent migration for: data loss, narrow-column operations (e.g., varchar(50) → varchar(20)), missing default on a NOT NULL add, lock-escalating ops on large tables, schema backwards-incompatibility.

The lint output is the value-add over Flyway / Liquibase - those tools are syntax-only; Atlas knows about destructive patterns.

Step 7 - Hash + integrity

Atlas computes hashes for each migration file. If a developer edits an already-applied migration, atlas migrate apply fails until atlas migrate hash re-syncs (intentional act). This protects against silent migration tampering.

Step 8 - CI integration

- uses: ariga/setup-atlas@v0
- name: Lint migrations
  run: atlas migrate lint --dir "file://migrations" \
    --dev-url "docker://postgres/17/dev?search_path=public" \
    --latest 1
- name: Apply migrations to staging
  run: atlas migrate apply --url "${{ secrets.STAGING_DB_URL }}"

GitHub Action ariga/setup-atlas@v0 provides Atlas in the runner; the atlas-action orchestrator provides PR-comment integration with diff visualization.

Step 9 - Composition with sister tools

Beyond atlas migrate lint, apply adversarial review with team-specific risk policies that Atlas's built-in lint doesn't capture (e.g., "no DROP TABLE without DBA approval").

Worked example

Add a NOT NULL column status to a 40M-row users table:

  1. Edit schema.sql to add status varchar(20) NOT NULL DEFAULT 'active' on users.
  2. atlas migrate diff add_status --to file://schema.sql --dev-url "docker://postgres/17/dev?search_path=public" writes migrations/20260506120000_add_status.sql.
  3. atlas migrate lint --dev-url "docker://postgres/17/dev?search_path=public" --latest 1 passes because the NOT NULL add ships a DEFAULT (a NOT NULL add with no default is flagged).
  4. CI runs the same lint on the PR, then atlas migrate apply --url "$STAGING_DB_URL" records the migration in atlas_schema_revisions.
  5. A teammate later edits that applied file; their atlas migrate apply fails on hash mismatch until an intentional atlas migrate hash re-sync - the tamper guard working as designed.

Anti-patterns and limitations

The failure modes (editing applied migrations, skipping --dev-url, declarative schema apply straight to production, skipping lint in CI, blind atlas migrate hash) and the tool's limitations (partial HCL for some DBMS features, general-purpose lint rules, --dev-url requiring a real DBMS, paid Atlas Cloud) are catalogued in references/atlas-caveats.md.

References

  • at-start - getting-started, install commands, example schema, all atlas commands, supported databases
  • at-gha - ariga/setup-atlas GitHub Action
  • atlasgo.io/docs - full documentation
  • github.com/ariga/atlas - repository
  • flyway-migrations, liquibase-migrations, sqlmesh-migrations - sister tools (Flyway / Liquibase = imperative versioned; SQLMesh = data-pipeline + schema)

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

testland의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고