본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

buf-cli-lint-breaking-build

Wraps the buf CLI for protobuf PR gating: `buf build` (compile .proto), `buf lint` (STANDARD rules: snake_case fields, Service suffix), `buf breaking --against {ref}` (detect wire/codegen breakage vs a git/BSR baseline), and `buf format`. Use as the CI proto-lint + breaking-change gate, or to debug a breaking failure by rule ID (e.g. FIELD_NO_DELETE_UNLESS_NUMBER_RESERVED) and pick the FILE/PACKAGE/WIRE_JSON/WIRE ruleset per consumer. This is the detection TOOL that enforces the rules and carries the catalog of what is breaking and why (field-number reservation, wire-safe vs wire-incompatible changes, oneof/map constraints, the four buf categories) in references/versioning-strategy.md; for cross-service schema contract testing use protobuf-compat-checking - not this.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa스타 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(5)

  • SKILL.md7.5 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json921 B
  • references/buf-breaking-rules.md2.4 KB
  • references/ci-integration.md1.5 KB
  • references/versioning-strategy.md7.7 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

buf-cli-lint-breaking-build

Overview

Wraps three buf CLI commands - build, lint, breaking - as the proto-PR gate, per buf.build/docs/cli/quickstart/. The catalog of what counts as breaking and why lives in references/versioning-strategy.md (+ references/buf-breaking-rules.md).

When to use

  • Adding buf as the proto lint + breaking-change gate on a new repo.
  • A PR changes .proto files - need to gate the merge.
  • Investigating a buf breaking failure - what rule fired?
  • Configuring buf for a monorepo with multiple proto modules.

Authoring

Install

Per buf docs, install via Homebrew, Go install, or release binary. Version 1.32.0 or higher is required. Verify:

buf --version
# 1.32.0 or higher

Configure buf.yaml

The v2 format per buf.build/docs/cli/quickstart/:

version: v2
modules:
  - path: proto
lint:
  use:
    - STANDARD
breaking:
  use:
    - FILE          # default; choose per references/versioning-strategy.md

STANDARD is the recommended lint rule set; it enforces conventions like "Field name should be lower_snake_case" and "Service name should be suffixed with Service".

The choice of breaking.use (FILE / PACKAGE / WIRE_JSON / WIRE) follows the per-deployment-model logic in references/versioning-strategy.md.

Configure buf.gen.yaml (codegen)

version: v2
managed:
  enabled: true
plugins:
  - remote: buf.build/protocolbuffers/go
    out: gen
    opt: paths=source_relative

managed: enabled: true automatically sets file options without hand-coding (e.g., go_package).

Running

Local validation pipeline

buf build && buf lint && buf breaking --against ".git#branch=main"

Three gates in order: compile, lint, breaking. All three must pass before merge.

buf build

buf build
# Silent exit on success

Compiles every .proto in the workspace. Silent → success. Any output → error. Equivalent to protoc compilation but reads buf.yaml for paths.

buf lint

buf lint
# Emits violations as: <file>:<line>:<col>:<msg>

Validates against the configured rule set. Common failures:

FailureRuleFix
Field name "userId" should be lower_snake_caseFIELD_LOWER_SNAKE_CASERename to user_id
Service "Users" should be suffixed with "Service"SERVICE_SUFFIXRename to UsersService
Message "user_data" should be UpperCamelCaseMESSAGE_UPPER_CAMEL_CASERename to UserData
Enum value should be SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASEENUM_VALUE_UPPER_SNAKE_CASERename

buf breaking

buf breaking --against ".git#branch=main"
# Compares working tree against main branch

Baselines (per buf docs):

BaselineUse
".git#branch=main"Compare against main branch (CI default)
".git#tag=v1.0.0"Compare against a release tag
".git#subdir=path/to/proto"Sub-directory baseline (monorepo)
"path/to/image.bin"Pre-built buf build image file
"buf.build/owner/module"Compare against published BSR image

Output on violation:

proto/foo.proto:42:5: Field "old_name" with type "string" no longer exists (rule FIELD_NO_DELETE_UNLESS_NUMBER_RESERVED).

Per buf breaking rules: each violation cites the rule that fired so you know which category constraint was violated.

Parsing results

CLI output (text, default)

Each violation: <file>:<line>:<col>: <message> (rule <RULE_ID>).

Pipe to grep / awk for counts:

buf breaking --against ".git#branch=main" 2>&1 | tee buf-breaking.log
wc -l buf-breaking.log

Machine-readable output

buf lint --error-format=json
# Emits: [{"path":"...","start_line":...,"start_col":...,"end_line":...,"type":"FIELD_LOWER_SNAKE_CASE","message":"..."}]

buf breaking --against ".git#branch=main" --error-format=json

For consumption by a unified reporter.

CI integration

Gate buf build / lint / breaking on PRs that touch .proto, buf.yaml, or buf.gen.yaml. Key gotcha: fetch-depth: 0 so git has the baseline commit available. Full GitHub Actions workflow plus the failure PR-comment: references/ci-integration.md.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Skipping buf breaking on PRSubtle wire breakage merges; consumers crash at deploy timeAlways gate; never --ignore blanket
Comparing against the PR's own merge baseSelf-baseline; no detectionUse ".git#branch=main"
fetch-depth: 1 in CIgit can't reach baseline → buf errorsfetch-depth: 0
breaking.use: WIRE for codegen consumersGenerated code break (rename) passes; consumer build failsUse FILE or PACKAGE per references/versioning-strategy.md
Adding --ignore to suppress a real violationSilent regressionUse proper reserved + deprecation instead
Lint set MINIMAL for new projectsMisses snake_case + service-suffix conventions earlyUse STANDARD from day 1
One buf.yaml per proto fileDoesn't compose; lint runs N timesOne buf.yaml at module root
Inconsistent baselines (main vs tag)Different reviewers see different verdictsPick one CI baseline; document

Limitations

  • Semantic vs wire breakage. Per references/versioning-strategy.md, buf detects binary/codegen breakage. Semantic meaning changes ("field now means net price, not gross") are undetectable.
  • No cross-service compatibility. This is single-service schema lint. For service-to-service contract testing see protobuf-compat-checking.
  • BSR features require auth. Remote plugins, registry pushes, and buf.build/... baselines need a BSR account.
  • JSON-name detection is in WIRE_JSON only. Services that use only binary won't see JSON name changes detected.
  • Doesn't generate code automatically. buf generate is a separate step; this skill scopes to gating.

References

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

testland의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고