본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

k6-load-testing

Authors k6 JavaScript load-test scripts (VU loops + checks + sleeps), configures the `options` block with `stages` (ramp-up patterns) and `thresholds` (p(95) latency, error rate), runs via `k6 run script.js` or `--vus / --duration` ad-hoc flags, and uses thresholds as the CI pass/fail signal. Includes a latency-percentile interpretation reference: tail ratio (p99/p50), bimodal-distribution detection, coordinated omission and why naive p99 is optimistic, and constant-vus vs constant-arrival-rate executors. Use when the project ships HTTP / WebSocket / gRPC load tests and the team wants developer-friendly JavaScript authoring, or when a k6 threshold passes but the system still feels slow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa스타 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(14)

  • SKILL.md10.2 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json826 B
  • evals/capacity-claim-for-a-customer-contract/criteria.json6.6 KB
  • evals/capacity-claim-for-a-customer-contract/task.md9.9 KB
  • evals/laptop-run-about-to-block-the-release/criteria.json6.7 KB
  • evals/laptop-run-about-to-block-the-release/task.md10.1 KB
  • evals/manager-wants-the-soak-on-every-pr/criteria.json6.1 KB
  • evals/manager-wants-the-soak-on-every-pr/task.md6.3 KB
  • evals/nightly-gate-green-while-checkout-complaints-climb/criteria.json7.0 KB
  • evals/nightly-gate-green-while-checkout-complaints-climb/task.md10.2 KB
  • evals/six-months-green-then-a-peak-hour-outage/criteria.json7.6 KB
  • evals/six-months-green-then-a-peak-hour-outage/task.md11.2 KB
  • references/ci-integration.md1.6 KB
  • references/latency-percentiles.md12.4 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

k6-load-testing

k6 tests are .js files with a default-exported function that runs once per virtual user (VU) per iteration (per k6-running). This skill covers the load-testing workflow; k6's browser, synthetic monitoring, and chaos modes share the same script structure but are out of scope here.

When to use

  • The project ships HTTP, WebSocket, or gRPC services that need performance testing.
  • The team prefers JavaScript authoring (vs. JMeter's XML, Gatling's Scala/Java, or Locust's Python).
  • A CI gate is needed on p(95) latency + error rate - k6's thresholds are designed for this.
  • The team is on Grafana Cloud (k6 integrates natively) or wants a self-hosted CLI-only flow.

If the team is already deep in JMeter, the migration cost is non- trivial - evaluate jmeter-load-testing in place. For Python / Locust shops and JVM / Gatling teams, see the Gatling and Locust references in load-testing-overview.

Install

Install via k6 installation (brew, apt/yum, choco, Docker). Pin a specific k6 version in CI rather than "latest".

Authoring

Minimal script

import http from 'k6/http';
import { check, sleep } from 'k6';

export default function () {
  const res = http.get('https://quickpizza.grafana.com/');
  check(res, { 'status was 200': (r) => r.status == 200 });
  sleep(1);
}

(Per k6-running.)

The default-exported function runs once per virtual-user iteration. check() is a non-failing assertion that contributes to the checks metric; sleep() simulates think-time between requests.

Options block - stages

Per k6-running, the options export controls the run:

export const options = {
  stages: [
    { duration: '30s',    target: 20 },   // ramp up to 20 VUs over 30s
    { duration: '1m30s',  target: 10 },   // hold ~10 VUs for 90s (gradual scale-down)
    { duration: '20s',    target: 0 },    // ramp down to 0
  ],
};

Three canonical shape patterns:

PatternStages
Smoke testOne stage, { duration: '1m', target: 1 } - sanity check.
Average load testRamp up → plateau → ramp down (the example above).
Stress testRamp past expected peak; observe where the system breaks.
Spike testSudden ramp to high VU; back to normal; verify recovery.
Soak testLong plateau (hours); verify no resource leaks over time.

Options block - thresholds

Per k6-thresholds, thresholds are "the pass/fail criteria that you define for your test metrics" - the canonical CI gate:

export const options = {
  thresholds: {
    http_req_duration: ['p(95)<500'],   // 95% of requests under 500ms
    http_req_failed:   ['rate<0.01'],   // <1% errors
    checks:            ['rate>0.99'],   // >99% of checks pass
  },
};

(Per k6-thresholds.)

The threshold expression syntax is <aggregation_method> <operator> <value>. Available aggregation methods per metric type:

Metric typeMethods
Trendavg, min, max, med, p(N) (percentile, ms)
Countercount, rate
Raterate
Gaugevalue

A test that fails any threshold exits non-zero - the canonical CI gate signal.

abortOnFail

For long-running stress / soak tests, abort early if a threshold is already violated (k6-thresholds):

thresholds: {
  http_req_duration: [
    { threshold: 'p(95)<500', abortOnFail: true, delayAbortEval: '10s' },
  ],
},

delayAbortEval postpones the abort decision to let metrics accumulate before evaluating; without it, a 1-second test could abort on a single slow request.

Running

Ad-hoc (no options block needed)

k6 run --vus 10 --duration 30s script.js

(Per k6-running.)

--vus overrides the script's options; --duration runs for a fixed time without ramps.

Standard run

k6 run script.js

options block in the script controls everything; the CLI is hands-off. Preferred for CI.

Useful flags

FlagPurpose
--out json=<file>Stream raw metrics to a JSON file.
--summary-export=<file>Write the end-of-test summary to JSON.
--quietSilence the live progress UI (CI noise).
--http-debug=fullVerbose HTTP debug for triage runs.
--env KEY=VALInject env vars accessible via __ENV.KEY.
--config <file>Externalize the options block to a JSON file.

Parsing results

The end-of-run summary prints to stdout; --summary-export writes the same data as JSON for downstream consumption:

{
  "metrics": {
    "http_req_duration": {
      "values": { "p(95)": 432.1, "avg": 198.3, ... },
      "thresholds": { "p(95)<500": { "ok": true } }
    },
    "http_req_failed": {
      "values": { "rate": 0.004, "passes": 996, "fails": 4 },
      "thresholds": { "rate<0.01": { "ok": true } }
    }
  }
}

Pipe to jq for a quick gate report:

jq -r '
  .metrics
  | to_entries[]
  | select(.value.thresholds)
  | .key + ": " + (.value.thresholds | to_entries | map("\(.key) → \(if .value.ok then "PASS" else "FAIL" end)") | join(", "))
' summary.json

CI integration

Full GitHub Actions workflow - apt install, PR + nightly triggers, summary upload via if: always() - in references/ci-integration.md. A failing threshold causes k6 run to exit non-zero, failing the job.

Interpreting latency distributions

Passing a p95 threshold is necessary but not sufficient. The full interpretation workflow - expanding summaryTrendStats to p99/p99.9, the tail ratio (p99/p50) as a spread signal, bimodal-distribution heuristics, sub-metric cross-checks (http_req_waiting / http_req_blocked), coordinated omission and HdrHistogram correction, and constant-vus vs constant-arrival-rate executor semantics - is in references/latency-percentiles.md.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Hard-coded URLs / tokens in scriptScripts bind to one environment; secrets leak.Read from __ENV.API_BASE_URL, __ENV.API_TOKEN.
--vus 1000 --duration 1h from a developer laptopLaptop resource contention; client-side bottlenecks corrupt metrics.Run from a CI runner / dedicated load generator; never from a dev box for serious numbers.
Threshold p(95)<10000Practically meaningless - passes any sane API. Hides regressions.Set thresholds at meaningful budgets (500ms, 1s) tied to NFRs from the non-functional-requirement-extractor.
Soak tests in PR CIMulti-hour PR CI; team disables.Soak tests are scheduled-only; PRs run smoke / average load.
Missing sleep() between requestsHammering at full VU rate generates synthetic numbers; doesn't model real users.Include sleep(1) or randomized think-time after each iteration.
Asserting only http_req_failed rateA 30-second response that succeeds passes the rate gate but breaks UX.Always pair with http_req_duration percentile thresholds.

Limitations

  • Single-machine VU limits. A single k6 instance saturates one machine's outbound CPU / network - typically 20-50k concurrent VUs for HTTP. For higher loads, distribute via Grafana Cloud or k6 Operator on Kubernetes.
  • No native browser execution. The k6/browser module covers it but adds Chromium overhead; for browser-driven perf testing, consider lighthouse-perf instead.
  • JS sandbox limits. k6 uses goja (Go-based ES5+/some-ES6), not Node.js. npm packages with native deps don't work; pure-JS packages do. Use k6 archive to bundle.

References

  • k6-overview - main docs landing page.
  • k6-running - basic script + options + stages + ad-hoc flags.
  • k6-thresholds - threshold syntax, aggregation methods, abortOnFail / delayAbortEval.
  • jmeter-load-testing and the Gatling / Locust references in load-testing-overview - alternatives by language stack.
  • references/latency-percentiles.md - interpreting the latency distributions this skill's runs produce.
  • perf-budget-gate - downstream gate that aggregates k6 / lighthouse / load-runner verdicts.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

testland의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고