본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

mutmut-mutation

Configures mutmut for Python mutation testing - `pip install mutmut`, runs via `mutmut run`, browses results via `mutmut browse` or `mutmut results`, applies surviving mutants to disk via `mutmut apply {id}`, suppresses with `# pragma: no mutate` annotations. Configures via `setup.cfg` / `pyproject.toml` with `source_paths` + per-test selection. Use for Python codebases needing mutation-quality verification of pytest / unittest suites.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa스타 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(3)

  • SKILL.md7.1 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json571 B
  • references/mutmut-pitfalls.md1.3 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

mutmut-mutation

Overview

Per mutmut-docs:

"Mutmut is a mutation testing system for Python, with a strong focus on ease of use." (mutmut-docs)

Key features per mutmut-docs:

  • "Found mutants can be applied on disk with a simple command making it very easy to work with the results"
  • "Remembers work that has been done, so you can work incrementally"
  • "Knows which tests to execute, speeding up mutation testing"
  • "Interactive terminal based UI"
  • "Parallel and fast execution"

When to use

  • A Python codebase has a pytest / unittest suite with high coverage and the team wants to verify the assertions.
  • A specific module needs mutation-quality verification before shipping a release.
  • The team is debating "should we add another test?" - surviving mutants tell you where.

How to use

  1. pip install mutmut and confirm the pytest / unittest suite is green before mutating.
  2. Scope the run in setup.cfg or pyproject.toml (source_paths + test selection) so only project source is mutated.
  3. Run mutmut run - the first run is slow; state is cached so later runs are incremental.
  4. Read the score with mutmut results; open survivors interactively with mutmut browse.
  5. For each survivor, write a test that kills it; verify with mutmut apply <id>, re-run that test, then revert.
  6. Reserve # pragma: no mutate for genuinely unreachable lines only.
  7. Wire a weekly full run plus PR-scoped runs into CI, uploading mutmut results as an artifact.

Step 1 - Install + first run

Per mutmut-docs:

pip install mutmut
mutmut run

mutmut run "automatically detects test folders ('tests' or 'test') and locates source code" (mutmut-docs).

The first run is slow (full suite per mutant); subsequent runs use the cached state.

Step 2 - Configure

Per mutmut-docs, settings go in setup.cfg or pyproject.toml:

[mutmut]
source_paths=src/
pytest_add_cli_args_test_selection=tests/

Or in pyproject.toml:

[tool.mutmut]
source_paths = ["src/"]
pytest_add_cli_args_test_selection = "tests/"

Common config:

SettingUse
source_pathsWhich files to mutate.
pytest_add_cli_args_test_selectionWhich tests to run per mutant.
runnerpytest (default) or python -m unittest.
tests_dirOverride auto-detected test directory.
do_not_mutateRegex of files / lines to skip.

Step 3 - Browse results

Per mutmut-docs, "Results are explored via mutmut browse, where mutants can be retested or written to disk using mutmut apply <mutant>."

mutmut browse        # interactive TUI
mutmut results       # summary table
mutmut show <id>     # show specific mutant diff

Output:

Total: 142
Killed: 119 (83.8%)
Survived: 23 (16.2%)
Timeout: 0
Suspicious: 0

Step 4 - Mutators

Per mutmut-docs, common mutations include:

"Integer literals are changed by adding 1. So 0 becomes 1, 5 becomes 6, etc."

< becomes <=

break converts to continue and vice versa

Other mutators: arithmetic (+ → -), comparison flipping, constant replacement, statement removal.

Step 5 - Suppress with pragmas

Per mutmut-docs:

Use code comments to skip specific areas:

  • # pragma: no mutate (single line)
  • # pragma: no mutate block (indentation blocks)
  • # pragma: no mutate start/end (arbitrary ranges)
def divide(a, b):
    if b == 0:                  # pragma: no mutate
        raise ZeroDivisionError("intentional unreachable")
    return a / b

Use sparingly - each pragma is a confession that a line isn't mutation-tested. Reviewable in PRs.

Step 6 - Apply a survivor

Once a surviving mutant is identified, write a test that catches it. To verify the test catches this specific mutation:

mutmut apply <mutant-id>     # writes the mutant to disk
pytest tests/affected_test.py # the new test should fail
git checkout src/             # revert the mutant

This proves the test catches the specific bug class.

Step 7 - CI integration

- name: Mutation testing
  if: github.event_name == 'schedule'   # weekly
  run: |
    pip install -e '.[dev]'
    pip install mutmut
    mutmut run --max-children 4
- name: Surface results
  if: always()
  run: mutmut results > mutation-summary.txt
- uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
  if: always()
  with:
    name: mutation-results
    path: mutation-summary.txt

For PRs, mutmut doesn't have native incremental mode; use source_paths to scope to changed files via a wrapper script:

CHANGED=$(git diff --name-only origin/main...HEAD | grep '^src/')
mutmut run --paths-to-mutate "$CHANGED"

Worked example

A team wants to verify the pytest suite for src/discounts.py before a release.

  1. Scope the run in setup.cfg:
    [mutmut]
    source_paths=src/discounts.py
    pytest_add_cli_args_test_selection=tests/test_discounts.py
    
  2. mutmut run, then mutmut results:
    Total: 142
    Killed: 119 (83.8%)
    Survived: 23 (16.2%)
    
  3. mutmut browse shows a survivor: the boundary if total > 100: mutated to if total >= 100: - the suite never exercises total == 100.
  4. Add a test for the no-discount path at total == 100, then confirm it catches the mutant:
    mutmut apply <id>                 # id from the browse listing
    pytest tests/test_discounts.py    # now fails on the mutated line
    git checkout src/                 # revert the mutant
    
  5. Re-running mutmut run shows the mutant killed and the score up by one mutant.

Pitfalls and limitations

Anti-patterns (pragma escape hatches, full-mutation-per-PR, third-party source_paths, unrealistic gates) and mutmut's limitations (slow runs, no native PR diff scoping, equivalent mutants) are catalogued in references/mutmut-pitfalls.md.

References

  • md - mutmut overview: ease of use, incremental work, intelligent test selection, parallel execution, configuration via setup.cfg / pyproject.toml, mutator examples (integer literals, comparison flipping, break/continue).
  • stryker-mutation, stryker-net-mutation, pitest-mutation, mull-mutation - per-language siblings.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

testland의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고