본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

stripe-test-cards-and-webhooks

Wraps Stripe API testing patterns: test-mode initialization, the canonical test cards (4242 success; 4000 0000 0000 0002 declined; 4000 0027 6000 3184 3DS challenge per the 3DS flows reference in payment-flow-states-reference), the Stripe CLI webhook flow (`stripe listen --forward-to`), the Stripe CLI fixture commands (`stripe trigger payment_intent.succeeded`), and the webhook signature verification (Stripe-Signature header + HMAC-SHA256). Use when testing Stripe-integrated code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa스타 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)
연동 도구Stripe

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(12)

  • SKILL.md6.5 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json631 B
  • evals/contractor-stabilised-the-suite-before-friday/criteria.json5.1 KB
  • evals/contractor-stabilised-the-suite-before-friday/task.md13.0 KB
  • evals/every-declined-card-shows-the-same-message/criteria.json5.7 KB
  • evals/every-declined-card-shows-the-same-message/task.md10.2 KB
  • evals/nightly-retries-double-the-test-charges/criteria.json5.1 KB
  • evals/nightly-retries-double-the-test-charges/task.md8.2 KB
  • evals/one-in-five-staging-deliveries-rejected/criteria.json5.7 KB
  • evals/one-in-five-staging-deliveries-rejected/task.md9.7 KB
  • evals/payments-job-burns-the-runner-for-six-hours/criteria.json5.1 KB
  • evals/payments-job-burns-the-runner-for-six-hours/task.md10.2 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

stripe-test-cards-and-webhooks

Overview

Stripe's test-mode is feature-complete: every API call works against test data, no real money moves. Per docs.stripe.com/testing, test keys (sk_test_* / pk_test_*) accept canonical test cards that deterministically produce success / decline / 3DS challenge.

When to use

  • Tests for code that integrates Stripe.
  • Verifying webhook handling.
  • 3DS challenge flow tests per the 3DS flows reference in payment-flow-states-reference.

Authoring

Install

npm install stripe
pip install stripe

Test keys come from the Stripe Dashboard (Developers → API keys → toggle to "View test data").

Initialize

import Stripe from 'stripe';
const stripe = new Stripe(process.env.STRIPE_TEST_KEY!);

Canonical test cards

Per docs.stripe.com/testing:

CardBehaviour
4242 4242 4242 4242Success (Visa)
5555 5555 5555 4444Success (Mastercard)
4000 0000 0000 0002Decline (generic_decline)
4000 0000 0000 9995Decline (insufficient_funds)
4000 0000 0000 9987Decline (lost_card)
4000 0000 0000 0069Expired card
4000 0027 6000 31843DS authentication required (challenge)
4000 0000 0000 30553DS supported but frictionless
4100 0000 0000 0019Fraud-prevention block

Test PAN any future expiry; any 3-digit CVC.

PaymentIntent end-to-end

test('successful payment via 4242', async () => {
  const intent = await stripe.paymentIntents.create({
    amount: 1000,
    currency: 'usd',
    payment_method: 'pm_card_visa',
    confirm: true,
    return_url: 'https://example.com/return',
  });
  expect(intent.status).toBe('succeeded');
});

test('declined payment', async () => {
  await expect(
    stripe.paymentIntents.create({
      amount: 1000,
      currency: 'usd',
      payment_method: 'pm_card_chargeDeclined',
      confirm: true,
      return_url: 'https://example.com/return',
    })
  ).rejects.toThrow(/card was declined/);
});

Webhook handler test

import { buffer } from 'micro';
import handler from './stripe-webhook';

test('webhook handler validates signature', async () => {
  const payload = JSON.stringify({ type: 'payment_intent.succeeded', data: {...} });
  const signature = stripe.webhooks.generateTestHeaderString({
    payload,
    secret: process.env.STRIPE_WEBHOOK_SECRET!,
  });

  const req = { headers: { 'stripe-signature': signature }, body: Buffer.from(payload) };
  const res = await handler(req as any);
  expect(res.statusCode).toBe(200);
});

Per docs.stripe.com/webhooks/signatures: the Stripe CLI's generateTestHeaderString produces a valid HMAC-SHA256 signature for testing.

Stripe CLI local forwarding

Per docs.stripe.com/stripe-cli:

stripe listen --forward-to http://localhost:3000/webhooks/stripe
# Forwards real Stripe webhook events to your local endpoint
stripe trigger payment_intent.succeeded
# Sends a synthetic event to test your handler

The CLI also exposes a signing secret (different from your prod webhook secret) for local testing.

Idempotency

test('idempotency key prevents duplicate charges', async () => {
  const key = 'order-12345';
  const r1 = await stripe.paymentIntents.create({...}, { idempotencyKey: key });
  const r2 = await stripe.paymentIntents.create({...}, { idempotencyKey: key });
  expect(r1.id).toBe(r2.id);  // Same PaymentIntent
});

Running

npm test

For webhook-integration tests with stripe listen running:

stripe listen --forward-to http://localhost:3000/webhooks/stripe &
npm test

CI integration

jobs:
  stripe-tests:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
      - run: npm ci && npm test
        env:
          STRIPE_TEST_KEY: ${{ secrets.STRIPE_TEST_KEY }}
          STRIPE_WEBHOOK_SECRET: ${{ secrets.STRIPE_WEBHOOK_SECRET }}

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Mocking Stripe SDK directlyLoses signature verification, error mappingTest against real test-mode API
Hardcoded test cards in many testsUpdate breakage when Stripe changesUse named constants for the card PANs
Skip webhook signature verificationWebhook replay attackAlways verify
Tests without idempotency keyRetried tests duplicate-createAlways set idempotency
Mix prod + test keysReal money riskStrict per-env key separation
Test webhook handler without raw bodybody-parser strips bytes; signature mismatchUse raw body middleware
One-off webhook event testsPer-event-type integration coverage missedTest the full event matrix relevant to your flow
Long-running stripe listen in CIHangs buildsUse stripe listen --print-secret then background

Limitations

  • Test mode is real API surface. Rate limits apply; long CI runs can hit them.
  • Dispute timelines compress in test mode. Use Stripe CLI trigger to fast-forward dispute states.
  • Webhook delivery has ~30s SLA. Tests waiting for webhooks need timeouts.
  • Doesn't validate platform-side bookkeeping. Stripe reports are separate.

References

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

testland의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고