본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

wcag-color-contrast

Reference for WCAG 2.2 color-contrast conformance - covers SC 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum, AA), 1.4.6 Contrast (Enhanced, AAA), 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast (AA), and 1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus (AA) - with the canonical contrast ratios (4.5:1 normal text, 3:1 large text and UI components), measurement formula references, and bulk design-token checking patterns. Use when designing a color palette, reviewing a component for accessibility, or auditing existing CSS for contrast violations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa스타 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md9.4 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json623 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

wcag-color-contrast

Overview

WCAG 2.2 specifies four color-contrast Success Criteria (wcag22):

SCLevelWhat it covers
1.4.3AAText contrast minimums - 4.5:1 normal, 3:1 large.
1.4.6AAAEnhanced text contrast - 7:1 normal, 4.5:1 large.
1.4.11AANon-text contrast - UI components and graphics - 3:1.
1.4.13AAContent on Hover/Focus - keyboard-dismissable, hoverable, persistent.

Large text per WCAG 2.2 (wcag22): 18pt+ regular OR 14pt+ bold (24px / 18.66px in browsers default; 19px+ if bold).

When to use

  • Designing a new color palette / design tokens.
  • Reviewing a component's CSS for contrast violations.
  • Setting up bulk-checking of design tokens via tooling.
  • Authoring per-component a11y checklists (paired with screen-reader-test-author references/wcag-checklist.md).
  • Configuring per-rule severity in axe-a11y.

Contrast ratios

Text (SC 1.4.3 - Level AA)

Text sizeRequired ratio
Normal text (<18pt regular, <14pt bold)4.5:1
Large text (≥18pt regular OR ≥14pt bold)3:1

Exceptions per wcag22:

  • Pure decoration (text in a logo, "lorem ipsum" filler).
  • Inactive UI elements (disabled buttons - though the disabled state should still have visible-but-low-contrast text).
  • Logotypes - brand text within a logo.
  • Incidental text (text within an image of running text where the image isn't an essential conveyance of information).

Text (SC 1.4.6 - Level AAA)

The enhanced version doubles down: 7:1 normal, 4.5:1 large. Use this for accessibility-first products (educational platforms, public-sector services).

UI components and graphics (SC 1.4.11 - Level AA, NEW in 2.1)

Visual presentation of UI components and graphical objects must have 3:1 contrast against adjacent colors. This applies to:

  • Form input borders.
  • Focus indicators (per wcag-keyboard-navigation SC 2.4.7).
  • Icon buttons that don't have text labels.
  • Visual state indicators (toggle switches, checkboxes).
  • Required-field indicators that rely on color alone.

Content on Hover or Focus (SC 1.4.13 - Level AA)

Tooltips, dropdowns, and other content that appears on hover/focus must satisfy three conditions:

ConditionMeaning
DismissableUser can dismiss the additional content without moving pointer or focus (typically: Esc key).
HoverableIf the content appears on hover, the user can move the pointer onto the additional content without dismissing it.
PersistentThe additional content remains visible until the user dismisses it, hover/focus moves elsewhere, OR the information is no longer valid.

Most "tooltip" libraries fail one of these - typically Hoverable (pointer leaves trigger → tooltip dismisses → can't read it).

Measuring contrast

The WCAG contrast formula uses relative luminance (per wcag22 formula):

ratio = (L1 + 0.05) / (L2 + 0.05)

where L1 is the relative luminance of the lighter color and L2 of the darker. Ratios run from 1:1 (identical colors) to 21:1 (black on white).

You don't compute it manually - use a tool:

ToolNotes
WebAIM Contrast Checkerhttps://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/
Chrome DevToolsElement panel → Styles → color swatch → Contrast.
Figma plugins (Stark, Able)Inline check during design.
polished (npm) getContrast()Programmatic check in tests / lint rules.
axe-coreReports all on-screen contrast violations during a scan (axe-a11y).

Common ratios for canonical color pairings

Foreground / backgroundRatioNotes
#000000 on #FFFFFF21:1Maximum.
#FFFFFF on #00000021:1Reversed; same.
#767676 on #FFFFFF4.54:1Just passes 4.5:1.
#999999 on #FFFFFF2.85:1Fails AA normal text.
#0000EE (default link) on #FFFFFF8.59:1Passes AAA.

The "just-passes" boundary #767676 is a design pitfall - small font-rendering shifts on Windows ClearType can drop the perceived contrast below 4.5:1. Aim for ≥5:1 in practice.

Design token bulk checking

When the project has a design-token system (e.g. --color-text-primary: #1a1a1a), check token combinations en masse:

// scripts/check-contrast.js
const { getContrast } = require('polished');

const tokens = require('../tokens/colors.json');

const TEXT_PAIRS = [
  ['--color-text-primary', '--color-bg-default'],
  ['--color-text-secondary', '--color-bg-default'],
  ['--color-text-on-primary', '--color-bg-primary'],
  ['--color-link', '--color-bg-default'],
  ['--color-error', '--color-bg-default'],
];

const violations = [];
for (const [fg, bg] of TEXT_PAIRS) {
  const ratio = getContrast(tokens[fg], tokens[bg]);
  if (ratio < 4.5) {
    violations.push({ fg, bg, ratio: ratio.toFixed(2) });
  }
}

if (violations.length > 0) {
  console.error('Contrast violations:', violations);
  process.exit(1);
}

Wire into CI per a11y-violation-gate.

Common failures

PatternWhy it failsFix
color: #999 on white2.85:1 - fails AA.Darken to #767676 or darker.
Placeholder text in #aaaSame problem; placeholders are still text.Match the disabled-text color used elsewhere; ≥4.5:1 OR remove placeholder reliance and use floating labels.
White text on a brand-color buttonMany brand colors fail 4.5:1 with pure white.Darken the brand color OR add a darker tone for hover/active.
Focus ring #aaa on a #fff background2.85:1 - fails SC 1.4.11 (3:1).Use #666 or darker; or add a 1px outline that contrasts both ways.
Required-field marker via red-only *Red on white: ~4:1 - passes - but also color-alone (SC 1.4.1).Add a non-color cue: text "(required)" or an icon.
Disabled button text contrast below 3:1Even disabled text should be perceivable.~3:1 minimum on disabled; test with users for whether this matches expected interactivity.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Designing in pure RGB (#3CB371) without a CIELab-aware toolTwo colors with the same RGB distance can have wildly different luminance ratios.Use a tool that computes WCAG-formula ratio.
Asserting contrast at the token level onlyTokens are correct but actual rendered contrast differs (transparency, pseudo-elements, dark mode).Bulk-check token pairs AND scan the rendered DOM via axe-core.
Single-mode token checkLight-mode pairs pass but dark-mode pairs fail.Check every theme variant.
Using opacity / rgba for subtle textThe browser blends; perceived contrast against the background is whatever the blended result computes to - often below threshold.Compute the blended color first; check that.

References

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

testland의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고