본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

web-vitals-inp-deep

Deep INP (Interaction to Next Paint) testing: decomposes input delay, processing duration, and presentation delay via the web-vitals/attribution build, asserts per-interaction INP budgets in Playwright using PerformanceObserver plus the web-vitals visibilitychange flush, and identifies long tasks blocking the main thread. Use when a page feels unresponsive while LCP and CLS are green, or to gate key interactions (form submit, modal open, route change) under an INP budget in CI. Covers interactions only - for page-load Web Vitals gating use lighthouse-perf; for service-worker cache-strategy latency use the qa-pwa plugin's service-worker skills.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa스타 13(GitHub 13 + cccskills 0)
연동 도구Playwright

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md8.2 KB
  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json787 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

web-vitals-inp-deep

INP is "the time from the start of the interaction to the moment the next frame is fully presented" per the INP web.dev article. Thresholds at the 75th percentile of page loads:

  • Good: ≤ 200 ms
  • Needs Improvement: 201 - 500 ms
  • Poor: > 500 ms

When to use

  • A page reports "feels slow" but LCP and CLS are green - INP is the missing dimension.
  • Pre-merge gate: assert key user interactions (form submit, modal open, route transition) stay under budget.
  • Field debugging: correlate field INP outliers with specific interaction types.

Step 1 - Install the web-vitals library

npm install web-vitals

Per the INP web.dev article.

Step 2 - Measure INP in lab (per interaction)

import { onINP } from 'web-vitals';

onINP((metric) => {
  console.log('INP:', metric.value, metric);
  // metric.attribution gives interaction details (target, eventType, etc.)
});

Per the INP web.dev article: the web-vitals library handles edge cases (BFCache restoration, visibility changes) that raw PerformanceObserver does not.

Step 3 - Decompose INP

INP encompasses three components per the INP web.dev article:

  1. Input Delay - time before event handlers begin (often long tasks blocking main thread)
  2. Processing Duration - time for all event handler callbacks to run
  3. Presentation Delay - time until browser paints the next frame

Use metric.attribution (provided by web-vitals INP attribution build) to identify which component dominates:

import { onINP } from 'web-vitals/attribution';

onINP((metric) => {
  console.log('Total INP:', metric.value);
  console.log('Input delay:', metric.attribution.inputDelay);
  console.log('Processing duration:', metric.attribution.processingDuration);
  console.log('Presentation delay:', metric.attribution.presentationDelay);
  console.log('Long animation frame:', metric.attribution.longAnimationFrameEntries);
});

Step 4 - Playwright assertion per interaction

import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';

test('modal open INP under 200ms', async ({ page }) => {
  await page.addInitScript({ path: 'node_modules/web-vitals/dist/web-vitals.iife.js' });
  await page.goto('https://localhost:3000');

  await page.evaluate(() => {
    (window as any).__inpValues = [];
    (window as any).webVitals.onINP((m: any) => {
      (window as any).__inpValues.push(m.value);
    });
  });

  // The interaction under test
  await page.click('[data-testid="open-modal"]');
  await page.waitForSelector('[role="dialog"]');

  // Force INP to flush. web-vitals finalizes INP inside its own
  // visibilitychange handler, which reads document.visibilityState
  // synchronously (per the [web-vitals README]). Redefine the property to
  // 'hidden' FIRST, THEN dispatch the event: if you dispatch first, the
  // handler still sees 'visible' and never reports.
  await page.evaluate(() => {
    Object.defineProperty(document, 'visibilityState', {
      configurable: true,
      get: () => 'hidden',
    });
    document.dispatchEvent(new Event('visibilitychange'));
  });

  const inps = await page.evaluate(() => (window as any).__inpValues);
  const max = Math.max(...inps);
  expect(max).toBeLessThan(200);
});

Step 5 - Identify long tasks blocking main thread

test('no long tasks > 50ms during route change', async ({ page }) => {
  // Install the observer BEFORE navigation and push entries onto a
  // window-scoped array. A closure-local array would never reach
  // window.__longTasks, so the later read returns [] and the assertion
  // passes vacuously regardless of real long tasks.
  await page.addInitScript(() => {
    (window as any).__longTasks = [];
    const obs = new PerformanceObserver((list) => {
      for (const e of list.getEntries()) {
        (window as any).__longTasks.push({
          name: e.name, duration: e.duration, startTime: e.startTime,
        });
      }
    });
    // 'longtask' is the Long Tasks API entry type; buffered:true replays
    // tasks recorded before the observer attached (per [MDN longtask]).
    obs.observe({ type: 'longtask', buffered: true });
  });

  await page.goto('https://localhost:3000');
  await page.click('[data-testid="route-link"]');
  await page.waitForLoadState('networkidle');

  const blocking = (await page.evaluate(() => (window as any).__longTasks ?? []))
    .filter((t: any) => t.duration > 50);
  expect(blocking).toEqual([]);
});

The richer successor to Long Tasks is the Long Animation Frames (LoAF) API (type: 'long-animation-frame'), but it is not yet Baseline across browsers per MDN LoAF, so attach it as a separate, guarded observer rather than relying on it alone.

Step 6 - CrUX field data correlation

Lab + field don't always match. Pair lab tests with CrUX queries:

# CrUX REST API - key from the environment, sent as a header
curl -X POST 'https://chromeuxreport.googleapis.com/v1/records:queryRecord' \
  -H "x-goog-api-key: $CRUX_API_KEY" \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"url":"https://yoursite.com/","metrics":["interaction_to_next_paint"]}'

Send the key in the x-goog-api-key header rather than a ?key= query parameter: per Google API keys, a key in the URL is exposed to theft through URL scans.

Field 75th percentile INP ≤ 200 ms = "Good" per the INP web.dev article. Lab passing + field failing = sample population mismatch (real devices slower, real interactions less predictable).

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Use raw PerformanceObserver for INPMisses BFCache, visibility-change reportingUse web-vitals library (Step 2)
Test INP only on click eventsINP measures all interactions; tap, keypress also countTest representative interactions per type
Use desktop CPU 4× speedHides regressions; field is mobile + slower CPUThrottle CPU 4 - 6× in Playwright config
Assert single sampleINP is jittery; one bad sample fails CIRun interaction N times; assert P75 ≤ budget
Fix INP by fragmenting handlers with setTimeout(0)Hides yield, doesn't reduce workActually reduce processing duration via deferral patterns

Limitations

  • INP became the official Core Web Vital in March 2024 (replacing FID). Some older audit tools still report FID - verify the tool uses INP.
  • Service worker interception adds presentation-delay variance (cache miss vs hit). Pin to a known cache state in tests. Testing the cache strategy itself is out of scope here: use the qa-pwa plugin's service-worker skills.
  • attribution API requires the web-vitals/attribution build bundle, not the default.

References

  • INP web.dev article - definition, thresholds, decomposition, measurement via web-vitals library
  • web-vitals README - attribution build, onINP, and the visibilitychange flush behavior
  • MDN longtask - Long Tasks API entry type and buffered observe
  • MDN LoAF - Long Animation Frames API (richer, not yet Baseline)
  • Google API keys - "Using an API key with REST": the x-goog-api-key header, and why a key in the URL is exposed

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Builds a CI gate that fails the build on **new** WCAG / a11y violations introduced by a PR while grandfathering pre-existing violations on a per-rule / per-page baseline. Aggregates verdicts from axe-core / pa11y / Lighthouse a11y / WAVE / IBM Equal Access scans. Use when a project has accumulated a11y debt and a strict "zero violations" gate would block every PR - the ratchet pattern lets the team ship while preventing regressions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics (guardrails, peeking) see experiment-results-interpreter's references; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use experiment-sdk-testing - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

The single install-flow skill: the reference contract for the PWA install flow (installability gate fields, `beforeinstallprompt` handshake, per-platform paths - Android WebAPK / iOS Share menu / Firefox no-op - and the `display-mode` post-install signal, in references/install-flow-reference.md) plus the build-an-X workflow that emits the Add-to-Home-Screen suite. Walks the four-stage timeline, emitting one test per gate cell per [web.dev/articles/install-criteria][install-criteria], the deferred-prompt → `prompt()` → `userChoice` chain per [web.dev/articles/customize-install][customize-install], the iOS Safari manual-metadata branch (`apple-touch-icon`) per [web.dev/learn/pwa/installation][learn-pwa], and the post-install `(display-mode: standalone)` MQ assertion. Output: a Playwright spec with per-stage cells plus a coverage matrix. Use when a PWA's manifest, icons, or install handler change, when install conversion drops at an unknown stage, or when triaging a flaky install assertion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Build-an-X workflow that uses an LLM to map existing tests to spec sections - given a spec doc + the test suite, the LLM identifies which tests cover which sections, surfaces uncovered sections (gap), and recommends specific tests to add. Output is a coverage matrix per spec ID. Scope is mapping tests that already exist and naming the gaps, not authoring tests for new acceptance criteria. Use when a spec doc and a test suite both exist but nobody can say which requirements are actually covered - before a release sign-off, an audit, or a decision about where to spend the next round of test effort.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Generates tests from natural-language specs (acceptance criteria, user stories, requirements) using an LLM, with confidence scoring per test case (LLM self-assessment plus heuristics: assertion quality, naming, completeness), batching uncertain cases for human review, and integration with the team's existing test framework. Use when the user asks to generate unit tests from acceptance criteria, convert user stories to test cases, automate test creation from requirements, or augment a spec-driven test suite with AI-generated stubs that are then curated before merge.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

Configures Allure Report (test-runner adapter install, `allure-results` directory wiring, `categories.json` for failure classification, `history-trend.json` retention via the copy-history-between-runs pattern), runs the Allure CLI to convert `allure-results` to a static HTML site, and uploads the report as a CI artifact. Use when the team needs richer test reporting than JUnit XML - step-level attachments, per-test history, retry tracking, and severity / epic / feature labeling across framework-agnostic adapters (pytest, Jest, JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, Mocha). As a rich static HTML report generator, it is the open-source alternative to the sunset ExtentReports (JVM/.NET per-test HTML narrative); for hosted cross-run flakiness analytics rather than a static per-run report use currents-integration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

testland/qa132026년 10월 20일 업데이트

testland의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고