본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

requesting-code-review

Prepares a focused code review request for a branch, commit, pull request, or substantial working-tree diff by defining the review boundary, contract, risk areas, evidence, and questions for an independent reviewer. Use before merge or when another agent needs to review an implementation. Not for processing feedback already received or for claiming runtime correctness.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md2.1 KB
  • references/review-request.md485 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Requesting Code Review

Make review cheap to perform and hard to misunderstand.

Prepare the packet

  1. Pin the comparison point and list changed files.
  2. Link the originating request, design, plan, or acceptance criteria.
  3. Summarize the behavior change and deliberately out-of-scope work.
  4. List risky boundaries: data, permissions, concurrency, public API, migrations, performance, compatibility, and user-visible behavior.
  5. Attach focused test/build/runtime evidence with command and result.
  6. Name known limits and ask specific questions rather than “please review.”
  7. Attach or write a short observable behavior contract for user-facing, CLI, API, generated-artifact, or operational changes. Keep it independent of the implementation so a reviewer can request source-blind validation.

Use review-request.md for the packet shape.

Reviewer selection

Ask for an independent pass when the change is public, risky, cross-cutting, security-sensitive, or difficult for its author to judge. Split contract and engineering-risk passes when independent agents are available. Keep the review scope large enough to include direct consumers but not unrelated cleanup.

Do not use a green test suite as a substitute for review, and do not present a review request as evidence that the change is correct. Pair source-aware review with behavior-validation when the change has a runnable public surface; a clean diff review cannot prove that surface works.

Completion condition

The request is ready when a reviewer can locate the contract, boundary, diff, evidence, and highest-risk questions without reconstructing author intent.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Designs and runs reproducible evaluations for AI agents, prompts, tools, skills, and model-backed workflows using realistic datasets, isolated baselines, objective assertions, rubric grading, trajectory analysis, cost/latency tracking, and regression comparison. Use when measuring agent quality, optimizing skill triggering, comparing prompts or models, or gating an AI feature release. Not for ordinary deterministic unit tests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

thiientv/godmode992026년 8월 26일 업데이트

Designs or reviews HTTP, REST, GraphQL, RPC, CLI, webhook, event, and service interfaces with explicit inputs, outputs, errors, compatibility, idempotency, pagination, authentication, versioning, and observability. Use when introducing or changing an API or cross-component contract. Not for internal implementation details with no boundary or for debugging one API failure; use root-cause-debugging there.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

thiientv/godmode992026년 8월 26일 업데이트

Reviews an existing codebase for structural friction, unclear ownership, leaky or shallow interfaces, excessive coupling, misplaced state, poor testability, and risky dependency direction, then prioritizes evidence-backed improvement candidates. Use for architecture audits, modularization, modernization, or recurring cross-cutting change pain. Not for designing one new interface, simplifying a local function, or fixing a reproduced bug.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

thiientv/godmode992026년 8월 26일 업데이트

Validates a running application, CLI, API, service, or generated artifact as a user or operator against a prewritten observable behavior contract while remaining source-blind. Use for acceptance checks, runtime proof, anti-fake probes, release smoke tests, or an independent companion to code review. Not for source-quality findings, root-cause diagnosis, or visual design judgment outside the contract.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

thiientv/godmode992026년 8월 26일 업데이트

Closes a completed development branch by checking the final diff and proof, presenting merge, pull-request, keep, or discard options, and cleaning up only after the user or repository workflow chooses a path. Use when feature work is complete and the branch must be integrated or retired. Not for claiming a feature is complete before verification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

thiientv/godmode992026년 8월 26일 업데이트

Tests a real web user flow with a browser by asserting semantic behavior, network and loading states, keyboard access, responsive layouts, and stable visual evidence. Use for browser bugs, end-to-end UI behavior, responsive or accessibility checks, and screenshot baselines. Not for static source review without a browser or for backend-only tests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

thiientv/godmode992026년 8월 26일 업데이트

thiientv의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고