본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

subagent-driven-development

Executes an approved implementation plan through fresh implementer and reviewer agents for each task, with explicit handoffs, focused tests, and task-by-task integration. Use for multi-task work where independent agent context improves implementation and review quality. Not for a single small edit, an unresolved design, or a failure that still needs root-cause analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

thiientv/godmode
설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md2.2 KB
  • references/handoff-packet.md666 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Subagent-Driven Development

Use fresh context to reduce author bias, while keeping the plan and evidence as the shared contract.

Before dispatch

  • Confirm the design and implementation plan are approved.
  • Create or select an isolated workspace when concurrent edits need it.
  • Split the plan into tasks with disjoint ownership and explicit interfaces.
  • Define the focused test and review gate for each task.
  • Prepare a compact handoff packet from handoff-packet.md. Include verified facts and portable anchors, not a full conversation dump or the expected solution.

Per-task cycle

  1. Give the implementer the handoff packet, repository rules, and only the context needed for the task. Ask it to edit the files directly and report evidence.
  2. Inspect the implementation diff and run the focused test yourself.
  3. Give a fresh reviewer the task contract, diff, and test output—not the implementer's private reasoning or your expected answer.
  4. Validate every finding against the real code path.
  5. Fix in scope, rerun proof, and only then dispatch the next task.

If a task reveals a design contradiction, stop and return to solution-design/implementation-planning; do not make the subagent silently redesign the system. Keep unrelated agents independent and close them when finished.

Integration

The coordinator owns final interfaces, conflict resolution, broader tests, and the completion claim. Agent success is an input, never final evidence. Use requesting-code-review for a final aggregate review and completion-verification for closure.

Completion condition

Every task has implementer evidence and reviewer disposition, the integrated branch passes its relevant checks, and remaining limits are visible.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

agent-evaluation

무료

Designs and runs reproducible evaluations for AI agents, prompts, tools, skills, and model-backed workflows using realistic datasets, isolated baselines, objective assertions, rubric grading, trajectory analysis, cost/latency tracking, and regression comparison. Use when measuring agent quality, optimizing skill triggering, comparing prompts or models, or gating an AI feature release. Not for ordinary deterministic unit tests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

thiientv/godmode982026년 8월 26일 업데이트

api-and-interface-design

무료

Designs or reviews HTTP, REST, GraphQL, RPC, CLI, webhook, event, and service interfaces with explicit inputs, outputs, errors, compatibility, idempotency, pagination, authentication, versioning, and observability. Use when introducing or changing an API or cross-component contract. Not for internal implementation details with no boundary or for debugging one API failure; use root-cause-debugging there.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

thiientv/godmode982026년 8월 26일 업데이트

architecture-review

무료

Reviews an existing codebase for structural friction, unclear ownership, leaky or shallow interfaces, excessive coupling, misplaced state, poor testability, and risky dependency direction, then prioritizes evidence-backed improvement candidates. Use for architecture audits, modularization, modernization, or recurring cross-cutting change pain. Not for designing one new interface, simplifying a local function, or fixing a reproduced bug.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

thiientv/godmode982026년 8월 26일 업데이트

behavior-validation

무료

Validates a running application, CLI, API, service, or generated artifact as a user or operator against a prewritten observable behavior contract while remaining source-blind. Use for acceptance checks, runtime proof, anti-fake probes, release smoke tests, or an independent companion to code review. Not for source-quality findings, root-cause diagnosis, or visual design judgment outside the contract.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

thiientv/godmode982026년 8월 26일 업데이트

branch-integration

무료

Closes a completed development branch by checking the final diff and proof, presenting merge, pull-request, keep, or discard options, and cleaning up only after the user or repository workflow chooses a path. Use when feature work is complete and the branch must be integrated or retired. Not for claiming a feature is complete before verification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

thiientv/godmode982026년 8월 26일 업데이트

browser-testing

무료

Tests a real web user flow with a browser by asserting semantic behavior, network and loading states, keyboard access, responsive layouts, and stable visual evidence. Use for browser bugs, end-to-end UI behavior, responsive or accessibility checks, and screenshot baselines. Not for static source review without a browser or for backend-only tests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

thiientv/godmode982026년 8월 26일 업데이트

thiientv의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고