본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

pro-editing

Revise an existing course by correcting slide text, adjusting layouts, repairing quizzes, updating narration, or reordering pages. Edits preserve the course’s established voice and design while focusing on the specific changes requested.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Professional editing of a course that already exists. Use when the user wants to revise, improve, restructure or polish pages the course already has — fix a page, tune a layout, repair a quiz, reword narration, reorder the deck, or raise the quality of the whole course. Not for building a new course from scratch.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Correcting text and overlapping elements on course slides
  • Fixing quiz answers and scoring
  • Rewording narration and regenerating its audio
  • Reordering pages in an existing course

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md10.8 KB
  • outline-constraints.json552 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Professional course editing

You are editing a persisted course, not generating one. The pages already exist in storage; your work is surgical — read what is there, change exactly what was asked for, and leave everything else untouched.

Enter the course before touching it

This skill is active because the course already has pages (the session is attached to an existing course, or the classroom was already built). Before any edit:

  1. Call list_scenes to take stock of the whole course: every persisted page, its order, its type. This list — not your assumption — is the map you edit by.
  2. Do not plan a replacement stage. The course has a structure; you are not replanning it.
  3. If the request is broad ("make it better"), turn it into a concrete plan against the page list and say which pages you will touch before touching them.
  4. If a read says the course is still being generated, it is read-only until generation completes: do not offer to edit it or to generate its remaining pages (the generation is already producing them) — tell the user to wait.

Read before every change

Read the target page with read_stage path:/scenes/<order|id> immediately before editing it. The inventory it returns — element ids, question ids, action ids, widget config — is the only address space you may edit against, and it tells you the page's true type. A stale id is a failed edit; a stale assumption about what is on the page is a wrong edit. If an edit lands on the wrong page type, that is a signal to re-read, not to force the operation.

read_stage has three levels, and a slide edit uses the deep one. The default tree is a compact map — enough to find an element, never enough to edit it, because it strips the styles. Before any slide write, read the page with detail:"source": it returns the page's exact persisted JSON (all style fields, raw content HTML with inline marks and line breaks, exact geometry, z-order), and it is the root your patch paths address — a field read at /content/canvas/elements/2/left is written back through that same path. It always returns the whole page, so indices cannot drift between the read and the write. detail:"text" is the third level: every text-bearing element as { path, id, type, text } plus a page-wide combinedText, for proving a page carries no leftover copy.

Choose the smallest operation

A slide edit is one of three operations, and the first one is a single JSON Pointer write against what detail:"source" just returned.

User intentToolOperation
Fix or rewrite text on a slidepatch_stageset or str_replace on that element's content path — /content/canvas/elements/N/content, …/text/content, …/data/0/0/text, …/lines/1/content, …/latex
Move / resize / rotate an element, fix overlappatch_stageset on /content/canvas/elements/N/left (or top / width / height / rotate), one number per op
Recolor or restyle an elementpatch_stageset on the renderer-owned style path — …/defaultColor, …/fill, …/text/defaultColor, …/color
Drop an optional fieldpatch_stageremove on that path
Swap an image or media sourcepatch_stageset on /content/canvas/elements/N/src
Restack slide elementspatch_stageset on /content/canvas/elements — the whole array, reordered, same ids and types
Add or remove a slide elementpatch_stageadd_element (complete JSON, no id) / delete_element
Fix quiz questions, options, answers, scoringpatch_stageset / remove against /content/questions/...; additions rewrite the complete array
Change an interactive pagepatch_stageset / remove / str_replace against /content/widgetConfig/... or /content/html
Reword / insert / remove / reorder narrationpatch_stagescene-root pointers under /actions/...; rewrite a complete array for insertion/reorder
Edit a PBL brief, roles, milestones, microtaskspatch_stageset / remove against /content/projectV2/...
Rename / insert / delete / reorder whole pagesedit_deckretitle / insert / delete / reorder
Rewrite one page from scratchgenerate_scene + instructiononly on explicit user intent for a full-page rewrite

Rules of the matrix:

  • One intent → one operation. Do not bundle changes you cannot individually name.
  • Address the leaf. The smallest path that isolates your change is the correct one; writing a whole object back is how a neighbouring style field disappears.
  • A patch_stage op cannot change identity — not the canvas id, not the element id set, not an element's type. Those go through add_element / delete_element, and a type change is a delete plus an add. Content itself is unchecked — it is stored exactly as written, so slide-dsl is the only thing standing between your markup and a broken page.
  • A rejected patch changed nothing. A bad path, an out-of-bounds index, an unknown field, a wrong type or an invalid resulting page fails loud with the page as it was. Re-read and resubmit; never force.
  • add_element takes one complete element JSON without id — the server validates the same structure contract as a patch, assigns the id, and inserts at afterId or index (one or the other).
  • Nothing normalises your values. No colour, font or theme is rewritten toward a house style, so an edit that looks wrong is your value, not the tool's.
  • edit_deck insert creates an empty stub; fill it with generate_scene using that new page's explicit type and brief, or patch an already valid scene.
  • generate_scene with instruction discards the page and regenerates it. That is a rewrite, not an edit: reserve it for the moment the user plainly wants a page rebuilt, never as a shortcut around careful editing.
  • If the session has attached materials or web access, use them to ground the content of your edits — never as an excuse to rebuild pages nobody asked about.

Minimum-edit discipline

  • Change exactly what was asked for. Do not restyle untouched elements, do not reword narration nobody complained about, do not "improve" adjacent pages while you are on one page.
  • Keep the course's own voice: match its existing terminology, register and visual language. An edit should not be visible as an edit.
  • Prefer fine per-field patch_stage ops over generate_scene whenever the target is narrower than a whole page.
  • For any slide edit that touches geometry, colour, text length or rich-text structure, load slide-craft: it carries the design law the page was drawn under — the text height table, the type scale, contrast pairs, spacing rhythm, and which field on which element type actually reaches the screen.
  • When you need the field itself — its name, its legal values, the path that addresses it, which of two fields the renderer reads — that is slide-dsl.

Look → edit → look, on a budget

For layout-sensitive changes (positioning, density, new elements, alignment), verify with render_scene_preview when it is available: look at the render, edit, look once more. Budget at most two preview rounds per page — each render costs a tool call and the whole run has a hard call cap. Do not preview pages you did not touch, and do not loop past the budget: if two rounds have not converged, stop and tell the user what remains instead of burning the rest of the run on one page.

Narration audio follows text

Setting a speech action's /actions/N/text with patch_stage clears the audio of a reworded line, and inserted lines have none. After any speech wording change, call generate_tts on that page before moving on — its default mode synthesizes only the lines missing audio, which is exactly what you need. Reworded text without regenerated audio ships a silent page.

Close with a consistency pass

Before telling the user the work is done:

  1. list_scenes — confirm the page list matches what you intended: count, order, titles.
  2. Each edit result already carried the fresh inventory of its page; verify against it, and re-read with read_stage only where a result left doubt.
  3. Sweep the pages you touched for cross-page drift your edits could have introduced: the same concept named the same way, uniform units and terminology, a style you introduced applied everywhere it belongs.
  4. Every speech action on a touched page must have an audioId (read_stage shows it); any page missing audio gets generate_tts.

Share the course with human editors

Saves are last-write-wins per page, and a human authoring in the browser at the same time can overwrite you as easily as you can overwrite them. Treat the course as shared ground:

  • Read fresh, then write. The read_stage call immediately before an edit is not a formality — it is how you avoid writing over a change the user made since you last looked.
  • Small, incremental writes. Every tool call persists its change automatically as it lands; a sequence of small writes loses less to a conflict than one sweeping rewrite. Never accumulate a batch "prepared but not written" — write as you go.
  • Yield when the user is editing. If the user says they are changing the same page, or a fresh read shows content you did not write, stop, re-read, and reconcile before writing again. Never overwrite a human's fresher version with your stale snapshot.

Budget

There is no hard tool-call cap, but every extra call is latency the user watches. Spend calls on edits, not ceremony: one list_scenes at entry, one read_stage per page before its edits, the edits themselves, generate_tts where wording changed, a preview round only where layout is genuinely at risk. If the request is large, do the highest-value edits first and tell the user what remains.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Turn past classrooms and chat history into a reusable personal skill for course creation. It examines varied examples, checks recurring patterns and exceptions, and asks for corrections before saving instructions that reflect the user's workflow and quality expectations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing patterns across past course creation
  • Turning preferred workflows into reusable instructions
  • Checking inferred preferences against examples
THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC4.1만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Plan and build a connected series of lessons around learners’ experience and goals. After the user approves the complete lesson list, it creates lessons in order, checks continuity, and organizes them in one folder.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Building a seven-day introductory Python course
  • Creating a four-week onboarding program
  • Turning book chapters into separate lessons
THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC4.1만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Design courses where learners explore ideas by changing parameters, following diagrams, running code, playing games, or inspecting 3D scenes. Each main page focuses on one mechanism or structure, with opening and closing pages framing the learning.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Exploring how changing a parameter affects a system
  • Following a diagram to understand structure or flow
  • Learning an idea by modifying and running code
THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC4.1만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Create courses grounded in verified external facts, including recent developments, market data, product details, and scientific findings. It researches sources, records which evidence supports each claim, and carries those findings and uncertainties into page plans and content.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Creating a course about recent events or industry developments
  • Building lessons around verified market or policy data
  • Teaching product details or scientific findings with sources
THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC4.1만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Check important factual claims in courses or supplied content against available materials and authoritative sources. Review numbers, definitions, and contradictions, then receive a concise report with evidence and suggested corrections, or have generated course pages checked before delivery.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking facts in a completed course
  • Verifying important numbers and technical definitions
  • Finding contradictions between course pages
THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC4.1만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Build learning activities where learners explain an idea first, then improve their explanation through focused questions. Include plain language, checks on analogies, application to unfamiliar situations, and a record of remaining gaps and next goals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Learn a concept by explaining it in your own words
  • Turn existing materials into explanation-based activities
  • Test explanations without relying on technical terms
THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC4.1만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

THU-MAIC의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고