Pick among candidate outputs (code, configs, plans) by running them on diverse inputs and clustering by behavioural fingerprint, rather than by textual aggregation or log-probability. Activates when an executor returns multiple plausible candidates that need disambiguation, when output-majority voting would be the default choice, or when reviewing generated code that has not yet been validated. The 2026 evidence (Semantic Voting, arxiv 2605.08680v1) is that any execution-based selector dominates output-majority voting by 19-52pp; sketch-generated inputs beat random fuzz by 11.3pp. Triggers: "pick the best candidate", "majority vote on code", "select from N samples", "validate the generated output", "behavioural verification".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Output-majority voting (pick the most common string output) is dominated by any selector that actually runs the candidates. Semantic Voting (arxiv 2605.08680v1) shows 19-52pp improvement over output voting across multiple code benchmarks. The specific aggregation rule (majority, weighted, MBR-Exec) is statistically indistinguishable once execution evidence is present — execution is the dominant signal, aggregation is the residual.
This is the code-domain analogue of the noise-as-exploration Rosetta concept: execution diversity is the exploration mechanism; behavioural fingerprint is the equilibrium signal.
The Semantic Voting pipeline:
[output_ij for j in inputs] defines the cluster.wrap:verify and gsd-verify-work — pre-merge gate when verification produces multiple candidate fixes.gsd-code-fixer — when the fixer proposes more than one fix per finding.code-review — adds a "did you actually run it?" subsection to the review rubric.agent-systems / agentic-code-generation / agent-execution-grounded-selectiontest-generator (generates the inputs; pair with this skill for the full loop)아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Provides web accessibility best practices for semantic HTML, ARIA, keyboard navigation, color contrast, and screen reader patterns. Use when building UI components, reviewing accessibility, or when user mentions 'a11y', 'accessibility', 'ARIA', 'screen reader', 'keyboard navigation', 'WCAG'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Active listening techniques for effective communication. Covers attending behaviors, paraphrasing, reflective listening, clarifying questions, empathic response, barriers to listening, listening in conflict, and cross-cultural listening. Use when building listening skills, improving understanding in conversation, mediating disputes, or analyzing communication breakdowns.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Adversarial spec-compliance PR review — cross-references diffs against approved specs, verifies runtime claims against source, detects competing PRs, audits scope/convention compliance. Use before merging.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Provides best practices for AI agent orchestration including MCP servers, A2A protocol, multi-agent coordination, and swarm architectures. Use when designing agent systems, configuring MCP servers, setting up agent teams, or when user mentions 'MCP', 'A2A', 'agent orchestration', 'multi-agent', 'swarm', 'agent team', 'LangGraph', 'CrewAI', 'AutoGen'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Symbolic manipulation, equation solving, and algebraic structures for mathematical reasoning. Covers distributive law, factoring, completing the square, linear through polynomial equation solving, systems of equations (substitution, elimination, Gaussian elimination, matrix methods), algebraic structures (groups, rings, fields), modular arithmetic, polynomial theory, and inequalities. Use when solving equations, simplifying expressions, working with algebraic structures, or performing symbolic manipulation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Understanding how algorithmic systems shape what users see, know, and do -- from recommendation feeds to search ranking to credit scoring to hiring software. Covers the mechanics of recommendation systems, algorithmic bias and its sources, personalization's effects on information diets, opacity and accountability, AI limitations (hallucination, confident wrongness), and the human-in-the-loop question. Use when a learner needs to think critically about why particular content reached them.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.