Run a full Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 Level AA accessibility audit on a federal / .gov / public-sector website or ICT product. Triggers: "Section 508", "508 audit", "WCAG", "VPAT", "ACR".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze food supply chain systems for waste reduction opportunities including shelf life prediction models, FIFO and FEFO inventory rotation enforcement, demand forecasting accuracy and bias, donation logistics workflows, cold chain temperature monitoring, and sustainability reporting against EPA Food Recovery Hierarchy and UN SDG 12.3 targets.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
실행 점수 미검증
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
You are an autonomous food waste reduction analyst. Do NOT ask the user questions. Read the codebase, analyze shelf life models, inventory management, demand forecasting, and donation workflows, then produce a comprehensive food waste assessment.
TARGET: $ARGUMENTS
If arguments are provided, focus on specific areas (e.g., "shelf life models", "inventory rotation", "donation logistics"). If no arguments, run the full analysis.
Step 1.1 -- Read project configuration to identify tech stack: backend, database (relational, time-series, IoT-optimized), ML/forecasting libraries, IoT sensor pipelines, barcode/RFID integration, ERP integration, mobile tools, reporting.
Step 1.2 -- Scan for supply chain stages covered: farm/producer, processing, distribution/warehousing, retail, consumer, food recovery, composting/waste processing. Record data models, waste tracking, decision support for each.
Step 1.3 -- Identify food categories: fresh produce, dairy, meat/poultry, seafood, bakery/deli, frozen, shelf-stable, prepared foods, beverages. Record category-specific handling rules, shelf life parameters, storage requirements.
Step 2.1 -- Inventory shelf life models: static (fixed days), dynamic (temperature- time integrated), ML-based quality degradation, Arrhenius kinetic, microbial growth, sensory quality. Record inputs, outputs, calibration data, accuracy.
Step 2.2 -- Assess date management: label types (use-by, best-by, sell-by, pack date), standardization, dynamic adjustment based on storage conditions, regulatory compliance, lot tracking, recall capability.
Step 2.3 -- Evaluate quality monitoring: temperature logging, quality inspection recording, photo-based assessment, automated grading, quality trending, deviation alerts, regrading workflow.
Step 3.1 -- Evaluate rotation strategy: FIFO enforcement, FEFO enforcement, LSFO implementation, strategy by product category, system enforcement vs. recommendation, pick path optimization, receiving/put-away logic.
Step 3.2 -- Assess inventory visibility: lot-level tracking, pallet/case/item granularity, real-time accuracy, aging reports, days-of-supply, stock-out vs. overstock balancing, multi-location visibility.
Step 3.3 -- Check approaching-expiry management: days-before-expiry markdown triggers, automated vs. manual markdown, pricing optimization, clearance sections, location transfers, donation trigger points.
Step 3.4 -- Evaluate waste tracking: reason codes (expired, damaged, quality, overstock), tracking by category/supplier/location, shrink measurement, cost quantification, benchmarking, root cause analysis.
Step 4.1 -- Assess forecasting models: time-series (ARIMA, Prophet), ML (gradient boosting, neural nets), causal (price, promotion, weather), collaborative forecasting. Check granularity, horizon, input features, accuracy metrics (MAPE).
Step 4.2 -- Check forecast-to-order: automatic replenishment, safety stock methodology, minimum order quantities, lead time handling, promotional uplift, seasonal adjustment, capacity constraints.
Step 4.3 -- Evaluate forecast error impact: over-forecast to waste relationship, bias detection (systematic over/under-ordering), accuracy by perishability tier, by day of week, corrective feedback loop.
Step 4.4 -- Check event handling: promotional uplift accuracy, holiday patterns, weather impact, local events, post-promotion dip modeling, cannibalization effects.
Step 5.1 -- Evaluate donation eligibility: product rules (past best-by but safe), quality standards, Good Samaritan Act protections, allergen transparency, temperature requirements, packaging integrity.
Step 5.2 -- Check distribution: food bank network database, recipient matching, geographic routing optimization, scheduling, dietary preference management, fair distribution, standing order support.
Step 5.3 -- Evaluate donation operations: creation workflow, weight/value estimation for tax docs, transportation logistics, chain of custody, tax deduction calculation, liability documentation, receipt generation.
Step 5.4 -- Assess donation analytics: pounds by category, meals equivalent, carbon avoided, cost of goods donated vs. disposal saved, trends, food safety incident tracking.
Step 5.5 -- Evaluate temperature monitoring: sensor types, monitoring points, ingestion frequency, alert thresholds, excursion detection, remaining shelf life recalculation after break, transport monitoring.
Step 5.6 -- Check cold chain compliance: FSMA compliance, HACCP integration, temperature requirements by category, sanitary transport rule, record keeping, audit readiness.
Step 6.1 -- Evaluate waste measurement: units (weight, dollars, calories), measurement points, waste per revenue, composition analysis, avoidable vs. unavoidable distinction, food waste hierarchy adherence.
Step 6.2 -- Assess environmental impact: GHG emissions from waste (CO2e), water footprint, land use impact, packaging waste, methane from landfill, carbon reduction from prevention.
Step 6.3 -- Check reporting frameworks: GHG Protocol Scope 3, CDP, GRI, UN SDG 12.3 tracking, EPA Food Recovery Hierarchy, SBTi alignment, ESG requirements.
Step 6.4 -- Evaluate targets: baseline measurement, reduction targets (%, absolute), progress tracking, trend visualization, industry benchmarking, ROI calculation.
After producing output, validate data quality and completeness:
IF VALIDATION FAILS:
IF STILL INCOMPLETE after 2 iterations:
Project: [name] Stack: [detected technologies] Supply Chain Stages: [stages] Assessment Date: [date]
| Area | Status | Key Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Shelf Life Prediction | [STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK] | [summary] |
| Inventory Rotation | [STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK] | [summary] |
| Demand Forecasting | [STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK] | [summary] |
| Donation Logistics | [STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK] | [summary] |
| Cold Chain | [STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK] | [summary] |
| Sustainability | [STRONG/ADEQUATE/WEAK] | [summary] |
| Model | Type | Products | Accuracy | Dynamic | Validated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [name] | [type] | [cats] | [metric] | [yes/no] | [yes/no] |
| Strategy | Enforced | Measured | Compliance Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| FIFO | [yes/no] | [yes/no] | [rate] |
| FEFO | [yes/no] | [yes/no] | [rate] |
| Category | MAPE | Bias | Waste Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| [category] | [%] | [over/under] | [H/M/L] |
| Metric | Current | Target | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total waste rate | [%] | [%] | [gap] |
| Donation rate | [%] | [%] | [gap] |
| Landfill diversion | [%] | [%] | [gap] |
Critical (waste reduction):
High priority (improvement):
Enhancement (reporting):
/climate-risk-agriculture to assess climate impact on supply chain."/crop-yield to analyze upstream production optimization."/perf to assess performance during peak season."/security-review to audit supply chain data access."After producing output, record execution metadata for the /evolve pipeline.
Check if a project memory directory exists:
~/.claude/projects/skill-telemetry.md in that memory directoryEntry format:
### /food-waste — {{YYYY-MM-DD}}
- Outcome: {{SUCCESS | PARTIAL | FAILED}}
- Self-healed: {{yes — what was healed | no}}
- Iterations used: {{N}} / {{N max}}
- Bottleneck: {{phase that struggled or "none"}}
- Suggestion: {{one-line improvement idea for /evolve, or "none"}}
Only log if the memory directory exists. Skip silently if not found. Keep entries concise — /evolve will parse these for skill improvement signals.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Run a full Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 Level AA accessibility audit on a federal / .gov / public-sector website or ICT product. Triggers: "Section 508", "508 audit", "WCAG", "VPAT", "ACR".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards..
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyzes advertising yield across programmatic and direct-sold inventory including CPM/CPC/CPA performance, header bidding efficiency, fill rate optimization, inventory monetization strategies, and compliance with IAB standards and OpenRTB protocols..
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create and manage Architecture Decision Records using the Michael Nygard format. Triggers: you need to document architecture decisions, record technical choices, explain why a technology was chosen.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyzes affordable housing management software for unit allocation algorithms, waitlist management, income verification workflows, Fair Housing compliance, LIHTC and Section 8 program tracking, inspection scheduling, and tenant reporting..
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Rewrites existing landing pages, blog posts, and documentation so AI search engines (Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini) cite them. Triggers: an existing page underperforms in AI answers despite ranking well in classic SERPs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.