Run a full Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 Level AA accessibility audit on a federal / .gov / public-sector website or ICT product. Triggers: "Section 508", "508 audit", "WCAG", "VPAT", "ACR".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run a full retrospective and dev cycle analysis. Chains /recall → /new-features to reconstruct what went wrong, extract lessons learned, identify rework patterns, and synthesize feature ideas from the findings. Triggers: retrospective, retro, dev cycle analysis, what went wrong, lessons learned, postmortem, sprint retro.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
실행 점수 미검증
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
You are an autonomous retrospective-to-ideation agent. Do NOT ask the user questions. Run the full pipeline below without pausing between phases.
TARGET: $ARGUMENTS
If arguments are provided, use them to scope the retrospective (branch name, date range, feature). If no arguments are provided, analyze the full git history.
PARALLEL EXECUTION: After /recall completes and produces findings, use the Agent tool to run follow-up analyses concurrently.
Follow the instructions defined in the /recall skill exactly.
Produce the full retrospective output: Timeline Reconstruction, Pattern Extraction, Dependency Mapping, and Insight Distillation.
Save the retrospective output to docs/dev-retrospective.md (create the docs/ directory if it doesn't exist).
Key outputs to preserve for Phase 2:
Do NOT stop here. Continue immediately to Phase 2.
Now follow the instructions defined in the /new-features skill exactly.
Read ALL .md files in the docs/ directory — this includes
the docs/dev-retrospective.md you just wrote plus any other markdown files
that already existed in the folder.
Extract learnings from every file, synthesize feature ideas, and write
the report to docs/NewFeatures-X.md (where X is a 3-word kebab-case theme).
IMPORTANT: Features should directly address the pain points and inefficiencies discovered in the retrospective:
After completing all phases, validate the combined output:
STOP when:
IF STILL FAILING after 3 iterations:
When both phases are complete, print a summary:
Files generated:
docs/dev-retrospective.md — Full development cycle analysisdocs/NewFeatures-[X].md — Feature ideas derived from retrospective learningsKey stats:
Top insight: [single most impactful finding from the retrospective]
Next steps:
/spec [feature name] to generate implementation stories/iterate to start building a feature/research to validate features against competitorsAfter producing output, record execution metadata for the /evolve pipeline.
Check if a project memory directory exists:
~/.claude/projects/skill-telemetry.md in that memory directoryEntry format:
### /retro — {{YYYY-MM-DD}}
- Outcome: {{SUCCESS | PARTIAL | FAILED}}
- Self-healed: {{yes — what was healed | no}}
- Iterations used: {{N}} / {{N max}}
- Bottleneck: {{phase that struggled or "none"}}
- Suggestion: {{one-line improvement idea for /evolve, or "none"}}
Only log if the memory directory exists. Skip silently if not found. Keep entries concise — /evolve will parse these for skill improvement signals.
STRICT RULES:
docs/dev-retrospective.md so Phase 2 can read it.docs/ directory./recall and /new-features apply to their respective phases.아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Run a full Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 Level AA accessibility audit on a federal / .gov / public-sector website or ICT product. Triggers: "Section 508", "508 audit", "WCAG", "VPAT", "ACR".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards..
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyzes advertising yield across programmatic and direct-sold inventory including CPM/CPC/CPA performance, header bidding efficiency, fill rate optimization, inventory monetization strategies, and compliance with IAB standards and OpenRTB protocols..
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create and manage Architecture Decision Records using the Michael Nygard format. Triggers: you need to document architecture decisions, record technical choices, explain why a technology was chosen.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyzes affordable housing management software for unit allocation algorithms, waitlist management, income verification workflows, Fair Housing compliance, LIHTC and Section 8 program tracking, inspection scheduling, and tenant reporting..
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Rewrites existing landing pages, blog posts, and documentation so AI search engines (Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini) cite them. Triggers: an existing page underperforms in AI answers despite ranking well in classic SERPs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.