본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

user-experience

Apply a UX lens to a user-facing change: whether it serves the user's real goal and whether the path through it holds together, using the Understanding, Bridging, and Flowing contexts. Use when scoping, planning, or assessing any change that affects what a user sees or does. Loaded as a lens during planning and assessment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md2.5 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

User Experience

Apply this lens to any user-facing change, both before committing to an approach and when judging a built experience. Keep the work anchored to what the user is trying to accomplish.

Lead with the user's goal rather than a list of surface fixes. A pile of small corrections ("relabel this", "move that") is a sign the underlying flow was never examined. Start from intent and work down to detail.

Scope: this lens covers whether a change serves the user and whether the path through it is coherent. Visual and aesthetic craft — typography, color, spacing, motion polish — is a separate concern and stays out of scope here.

Understanding

Establish what the user actually needs before shaping a solution.

  • Name the user and the job they came to do.
  • Separate the stated request from the goal behind it, and solve the goal.
  • Ground claims about user needs in evidence (observed behavior, recurring reports, real usage). Flag a need that is assumed rather than known.

Bridging

Translate the need into the right solution rather than the first one that comes to mind.

  • Check that the solution addresses the goal, not just the visible symptom.
  • Weigh whether the change adds a step, a screen, or a concept the user must learn, and whether that cost is justified.
  • Check whether an indicator or notice the change adds repeats what an existing surface already tells the user, and prefer relying on that surface.
  • Prefer the path that removes work for the user over one that adds configuration or choices.
  • Watch for solving a builder's convenience at the user's expense.

Flowing

Trace the path the user takes from end to end.

  • Follow the full journey: how the user arrives, the change itself, and what happens after.
  • Walk the unhappy paths in the running software when it can be run: empty states, seeded defaults, errors, interruptions, first-time versus returning use. Flag any of these judged from source alone.
  • Confirm the user always knows what just happened and what to do next.
  • Surface friction: redundant steps, dead ends, and points where the user must hold state in their head.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Apply findings by making the suggested code changes. Applies accepted verdicts, escalates ambiguous findings to the user, and offers to note genuine improvements for later. Use when the user asks to "apply findings", "apply fixes", "apply suggestions", "apply accepted findings", "fix the findings", or "apply the review results".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tobihagemann/turbo4142026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Audit the turbo skill lessons that /self-improve writes into this repo's .turbo/handoff/ from other projects, apply the ones the user approves, delete the consumed handoffs, commit and push, and update the installed Turbo skills. Use when the user asks to "read .turbo/handoff and let me know what you think", "read the handoff files and let me know what you think", "review the lesson handoffs", "apply the self-improve handoffs", or "process the turbo handoffs".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tobihagemann/turbo4142026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Assess project-wide structural technical debt: complexity hotspots, deprecated API usage, duplication clusters, architecture rot, and low-value tests. Ranks findings by impact and refactor effort into a report at .turbo/technical-debt.md. Use when the user asks to "assess technical debt", "find technical debt", "review technical debt", "what should we refactor", "find refactoring candidates", "where is the code rot", "what's our worst code", "find low-value tests", or "which tests can we delete". Analysis-only — does not modify code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tobihagemann/turbo4142026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Shared changelog conventions and formatting rules referenced by $create-changelog and $update-changelog. Not typically invoked directly.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tobihagemann/turbo4142026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Shared changelog conventions and formatting rules referenced by /create-changelog and /update-changelog. Not typically invoked directly.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tobihagemann/turbo4142026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Run a non-interactive Claude Code print-mode call from Codex. Use when the user asks to "claude print", "ask claude", "run claude", "consult claude", or when a Codex Turbo skill needs Claude as an independent peer reviewer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tobihagemann/turbo4142026년 10월 19일 업데이트

tobihagemann의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고