본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

dependency-coverage-drain

Drain the Pharos Dependency Map coverage-audit queues into evidence-refreshed edges, reviewed target dispositions, or documented deferrals. Use monthly after weekly production dependency audits, after dependency coverage drops, or when reviewing adapter gaps, material unlinked slices, symbol leads, duplicate/split groups, or unverifiable published edges.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md7.9 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Read docs/editorial-style.md before writing. Its universal rules and the named technical-evidence register govern all Pharos-owned prose; this skill adds only factual, sourcing, schema, and format requirements.

Dependency Coverage Drain

Turn the weekly production audit queues into reviewed dependency changes. Leads never create edges automatically. A link requires current claim identity plus a measured basket weight or reviewed serial/mechanism semantics.

The queue is permanent research intake, not a shadow graph. Keep it separate from static merge enforcement and the weekly production structural audit: the weekly job can fail and alert but is not a release gate. Static-versus-published reconciliation is advisory; differences never authorize edges or overrides.

Required Context

Read routed docs and scoped instructions, coverage semantics, and the runbook's commands and reviewed-ledger contract. In docs/runbooks/artifacts/dependency-coverage-reviewed-ledger.json, read only the current claim groups and their decision history to derive the latest status; do not preload the whole ledger. Inspect the emitting queues in scripts/maintenance/generate-dependency-coverage-audit.ts, admission rules in shared/lib/dependency-derivation.ts, and reviews in shared/data/coverage-dispositions/dependency-target-dispositions.ts.

Use the reserve-research skill (.codex/skills/reserve-research/SKILL.md) for reserve evidence, provenance, custody, backing dependencies, and source freshness. Read the relevant adapter and authored reserves before changing a claim. Verified docs own durable policy; /agents/ holds scratch evidence only.

For pinned RPC reads and provenance, follow Pinned On-Chain Evidence.

Queue Snapshot

Run the read-only production report:

npm run audit:coverage -- --domain=dependency-coverage --prod

Capture the report and static-versus-published reconciliation using the runbook. Record access date, publication generation and timestamp, supply timestamp, report counts, and whether inputs are production, local, or fixture-derived. A held publication can predate current supply and local registry changes. Do not call a static-versus-published difference a missing edge without comparing authored relationships, admitted live reserve mappings, and the accepted publication.

Retain the validated upstream provenance.publication identity, original evaluation/publication clocks, source generations/digests, and health separately from audit generatedAt and capturing checkoutRevision. Reconciliation names both the audit checkout and current comparison checkout. Missing legacy provenance remains unknown; malformed supplied provenance rejects the report. Never treat a newer capture/check-out clock as renewed held evidence.

If production is unavailable, label the local or fixture snapshot and leave production-only conclusions open. Do not manually mutate production D1 or bypass admission guards.

Monthly Decision Workflow

1. Order and triage

Process unresolved items in dependent market-cap order, largest first. Unknown market caps remain unknown and are listed separately, never as zero. Use ledger age and next-review triggers within the same priority; immediately triage a failed weekly invariant rather than waiting for the monthly drain.

Handle each queue from its emitting source:

  • Adapter gaps: verify which mappings actually produce dependencies and add or refresh their dated adapterReview(...) registry entries in the same change as mapping fixes.
  • Target dispositions: resolve invalid, expired, or newly scoreable targets with current publication evidence. Recheck an intentional gap when its trigger fires.
  • Material unlinked slices: establish exact claim identity and the correct denominator, then measure the backing share. Protocol-wide assets, LP debt, or borrow-market collateral are not interchangeable with dependent backing.
  • Symbol leads: verify chain, contract, issuer and claim form. A symbol match, even unique, is only a research lead.
  • Duplicate/split groups: distinguish duplicate claims from additive measured positions in the same upstream. Preserve valid split positions; never deduplicate by label alone.
  • Unverifiable published edges: refresh primary evidence, retarget to the verified claim, or withhold the relationship to the coverage list. Do not treat the seed ledger's captured publication as a new verification.

2. Verify and decide

For each claim use dated primary issuer, contract, API, or on-chain evidence through the reserve-research skill. Bind observations to an access date and, for on-chain measurements, a stated block. Record the numerator, denominator, measurement time and source scope for weights. Do not fabricate weights or promote a settlement currency into a full backing claim.

Look through a bridge or intermediary only when its escrow/claim relationship is verified, preserving the required annotation and provenance. Otherwise withhold the canonical issuer link and record the unresolved representation on the coverage list without a guessed tracked target.

Resolve an item as evidence-refreshed, retargeted, or withheld; use deferred when a named prerequisite remains unavailable and rejected for a disproven lead. Withholding changes published data through the normal review/admission path, not by editing the audit output. Role dependencies remain distinct from serial/basket graph edges.

3. Preserve reviewed history

Append a dated decision for each reviewed claim group using the reviewed-ledger fields and rules. Seed entries remain open until actually reviewed; audit regeneration is not a review.

Preserve prior decisions when a row reopens; append a new decision rather than deleting history. Record a concrete next-review date or event for deferrals. Report the oldest unresolved first-seen date and oldest reviewed deferral; do not refresh dates to hide queue age.

Documentation and Validation

Update routed docs for changes to mapping semantics, queues or admission rules. Methodology-affecting changes follow ADR-3 in docs/architecture.md and the owning version/changelog contract; display-only or evidence-only changes do not receive an invented scoring revision.

Run focused tests for the changed producer/admission surfaces, npm run check:stablecoin-data, and npm run check:dependency-review-gaps. Repeat the production report and reconciliation after publication. The weekly production gate fails and alerts on structural issues but never blocks releases. Use pharos-release-runner only when publication is requested.

Output and Hard Stops

If all queues are empty, report source/date and zero counts, then stop. Otherwise report reviewed outcomes, changes by file, dated evidence, checks actually exercised, deferred prerequisites and triggers, remaining queue counts and age, and weekly failure risk.

  • Never create an edge from a lead alone, invent a weight, or bypass a missing target card.
  • Never replace a failed live mapping with stale curated weights to recover coverage.
  • Never change supply sources or weaken global scoring/admission gates to close the queue.
  • Never claim a verification from an old snapshot or bump reviewedAt without a new review.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Review the retained annotation candidate queue and curate per-coin editorial history. Use weekly during active event periods, monthly otherwise, or on queue-health warnings; this does not restore the retired live chart overlay.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

TokenBrice/pharos-watch232026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Generate a weekly changelog entry from git history, filtering operational noise and producing editorial summary, field notes, statistics, and a bounded commit manifest. Stops for review unless commit was explicitly requested.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

TokenBrice/pharos-watch232026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Research and populate tracked stablecoin compliance sidecars for the U.S. GENIUS Act, EU MiCA, or both. Use when adding or auditing authorization, applicability, pathway, or disclosure evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

TokenBrice/pharos-watch232026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Use when adding, reviewing, squashing, deploying, or rolling back Pharos D1 migrations or schema cleanup.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

TokenBrice/pharos-watch232026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Update Pharos funding donations by reconciling inbound transfers, rejecting wallet self-activity and spam, pricing receipt-time value, and appending user-approved rows.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

TokenBrice/pharos-watch232026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Draft a short, prioritized questionnaire for a collaborating stablecoin team when public evidence cannot resolve important Pharos data or confidence gaps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

TokenBrice/pharos-watch232026년 10월 18일 업데이트

TokenBrice의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고