Explain a GitHub pull request as an English Markdown walkthrough and return a Plannotator share link. Use for PR explanations, walkthroughs, or review preparation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Entity-aware code change analysis using the pi-sem tools. Use when the user asks what changed, wants blast radius or affected tests, needs focused context for a function/class, wants review help on a commit/branch/PR, or asks to compare semantic diff with raw git diff. Prefer sem_context and sem_impact; use sem_diff selectively for summaries and reviews.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Use the pi-sem tools as a semantic lens, not as a universal replacement for raw git diff.
Choose the smallest useful tool first:
Focused understanding of one entity → sem_context
Blast radius / affected tests / hidden dependents → sem_impact
scope=tests for test selectionscope=all when validating broader impactStructural inventory of a file → sem_entities
What changed across a commit/range/working tree → sem_diff
History / ownership of an entity → sem_log, sem_blame
For commit / branch / PR review:
sem_diff once for a semantic overviewsem_impact on those entitiessem_context on the suspicious ones you need to understand deeplygit diff, read, or direct file inspection before citing line numbersFor snapshot / folder review:
sem_entitiessem_context on the most relevant entitiessem_impact only after you identify something suspicioussem diff --format json is not always smaller than raw git diffsem may under-cover tests, assets, generated files, or non-semantic glue codesem output alone as final evidence for line-level review commentsgit diff, read, grep, and file inspectionsem_diffsem_impact with scope=testssem_contextsem_entitiessem_logAvoid these habits:
sem_diff repeatedly when sem_context would answer the question fastergit diff for entity counts or blast radius questionssem_impact as infallible; verify surprising results with file reads and grep아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Explain a GitHub pull request as an English Markdown walkthrough and return a Plannotator share link. Use for PR explanations, walkthroughs, or review preparation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review, triage, and resolve PR review comments. Use when user asks to check PR comments, address review feedback, fix issues raised in review, reply to reviewers, or resolve review threads.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Codify project review rules as deterministic guards — ast-grep structural rules (with TDD-style rule tests) for mechanical checks, REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md for qualitative ones, wired into the project gate / wf verify. Use when the user wants to define review rules, turn a repeated review finding into a lint/guard, or set up ast-grep in a project.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Vytvoř workflow kontrakt z dosavadní diskuse — zapíše ~/Workspace/specs/<projekt>/<název>/contract.md (české tělo + strojový frontmatter) a zlintuje ho wf-gate. Použij, když uživatel řekne /wf nebo chce z probraného problému udělat kontrakt. Nikdy neimplementuje.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
České vysvětlení změny kódu z kontraktu, ref range nebo PR — pozadí, intuice, průchod kódem, důkazy, UAT a kvíz. Volá wf-impl po UAT nebo uživatel ručně.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Dirigent jednoho workflow kontraktu ve svém super.engineering worktree — deleguje implementaci na subagenta, mezi fázemi pouští wf-gate, review předá skill wf-review, otevře draft PR (guardovaný), vyřeší komentáře, spustí UAT. Použij, když task session říká, že se má kontrakt provést přes wf-impl.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.