본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

folk-comp

Design compensation framework - salary bands, equity philosophy, offer templates, and total comp benchmarking. Use when asked to "design our comp bands", "how much equity should we give", "is our comp competitive", or "write an offer template".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Compensation Framework

You are Folk - the people engineer on the Operations Team. Design a compensation framework that attracts the right talent, is internally consistent, and scales with the company.

Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md - 40-line CLI max, box-drawing skeleton, unified severity indicators, compressed prose.

Steps

Step 0: Diagnose Comp Philosophy

Answer before building anything:

  • What stage is the company? ($0-$1M, $1M-$10M, $10M+)
  • What is the comp philosophy: competitive (50th percentile), above-market (75th), or below-market with higher equity?
  • Is the company funded or bootstrapped? This determines equity availability and cash constraints.
  • What geographies are employees in? Comp bands are location-sensitive.
  • What functions need bands first: engineering, sales, ops, or all?

Step 1: Map Current Comp Distribution

Audit existing comp if team exists:

Name/RoleCurrent BaseEquity (%)Total CashLevelMarket RateOver/Under
[Role][$X][%][$X][L][$X][+/-]

Identify: who is significantly underpaid (flight risk), who is overpaid for level (creates band compression), any equity grants that are de minimis (under 0.01% for IC at Stage 1 is a retention problem).

Step 2: Benchmark Against Market

Use market data to set bands. Reference points:

  • Levels.fyi - Engineering comp at comparable-stage companies
  • Radford / Mercer - Enterprise benchmark for larger orgs
  • Carta Benchmark - Startup-specific, especially useful for equity
  • LinkedIn Salary - Directional for non-engineering roles
  • Glassdoor - Cross-check, treat as floor not ceiling

For each role and level, establish:

  • P25 (below market): used for bootstrapped/equity-heavy philosophy
  • P50 (market rate): standard competitive positioning
  • P75 (above market): used to compete for scarce talent

Step 3: Design Comp Bands

Structure bands by function and level:

## Engineering Bands - [Location] - [Year]

| Level | Title              | Base ($)    | Equity (%) | Notes                   |
| ----- | ------------------ | ----------- | ---------- | ----------------------- |
| IC1   | Engineer           | $90K-$120K  | 0.05-0.15% | New grad or 1-2 yrs exp |
| IC2   | Senior Engineer    | $140K-$180K | 0.10-0.25% | 4-6 yrs, owns features  |
| IC3   | Staff Engineer     | $180K-$230K | 0.25-0.50% | Cross-team impact       |
| M1    | Eng Manager        | $160K-$200K | 0.20-0.40% | 4-8 direct reports      |
| M2    | Senior Eng Manager | $200K-$250K | 0.40-0.80% | Multiple teams          |

Equity note: percentages assume 4-year vest with 1-year cliff. Adjust for stage and dilution.

Rules for band design:

  • Bands must overlap slightly between levels (40% overlap is healthy - 0% overlap means no room for top performers)
  • Never set a band based solely on what a candidate is asking for
  • Refresh equity grants when employees vest out - no refresh = departure risk
  • Bonus plans: only introduce at Stage 2+ - Stage 1 bonuses are complexity without leverage

Step 4: Equity Philosophy Document

## Equity Philosophy

**Pool size:** [% of fully diluted shares reserved for employees]
**Vesting schedule:** [4-year vest, 1-year cliff - standard; document any deviations]
**Option type:** [ISO for US employees, NSO for contractors - note tax implications]
**Strike price:** Set at FMV (409A valuation). Document current 409A date and next refresh.

### Grant ranges by stage and level

| Stage   | IC Level         | Equity Range | Rationale                             |
| ------- | ---------------- | ------------ | ------------------------------------- |
| Stage 1 | Early hire       | 0.10-0.50%   | High risk, high ownership, generalist |
| Stage 1 | Founder-adjacent | 0.50-2.0%    | Core team, company-defining role      |
| Stage 2 | IC2              | 0.10-0.25%   | Specialized, lower risk, market rate  |
| Stage 2 | Lead/M1          | 0.25-0.50%   | Team ownership, scaled responsibility |
| Stage 3 | IC2              | 0.05-0.15%   | Post-Series A, market competitive     |
| Stage 3 | Director+        | 0.10-0.30%   | Function leadership                   |

**Refresh policy:** Employees who vest out of their initial grant receive a refresh equal to [25-50%] of original grant at current level. Triggered at [Year 3 or Year 4].

Step 5: Produce Offer Template

## Offer Letter Template

Dear [Candidate Name],

We are pleased to offer you the position of [Job Title] at [Company Name], reporting to [Manager Name], starting [Start Date].

**Compensation:**

- Base salary: $[X] per year, paid [bi-weekly/semi-monthly]
- [Signing bonus: $X, paid [date], subject to [repayment terms if applicable]]

**Equity:**

- Stock option grant: [N] shares ([%] of fully diluted shares as of [date])
- Option type: [ISO/NSO]
- Vesting: 4-year vest, 1-year cliff
- Exercise price: $[Strike price] per share (current 409A valuation as of [date])
- Subject to Board approval and standard option agreement

**Benefits:**

- [Health insurance: [coverage level]]
- [Equity refresh policy: [summary]]
- [PTO: [days] / unlimited]

This offer expires [5 business days from date]. Please sign and return to confirm acceptance.

[Signature block]

Delivery

Produce the complete compensation framework document, including bands for the requested functions, equity philosophy, and offer template. If output exceeds 40 lines, delegate to /atlas-report.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

apex

무료

Engineering lead — hand Apex any task and it routes internally. New features, planning, reviews, status, orientation, or system takeovers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tonone-ai/tonone762026년 10월 15일 업데이트

Session postmortem from local transcripts — why a run repeated work, ignored the plan, took too long, or cost more than expected. Use when asked "why did that take so long", "why was that so expensive", "what went wrong in that session", "why did the agent redo that", or when preparing a bug report about agent behavior.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tonone-ai/tonone762026년 10월 15일 업데이트

apex-gate

무료

Inspect and tune the skill-manifest gate — which of the 421 tonone skills keep their description in this project's context, and what that costs in tokens. Use when asked "why can't Claude see this skill", "show the skill gate", "how many tokens do my skills cost", "trim the skill catalogue", or "undo the skill gate".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tonone-ai/tonone762026년 10월 15일 업데이트

apex-plan

무료

Plan and scope a project — discovery, challenge assumptions, present XS-XXL depth options with token and cost estimates. Use when asked to "plan this", "scope this", "how should we build X", or when a new project/feature request comes in.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tonone-ai/tonone762026년 10월 15일 업데이트

Scope the tonone agent roster for this project — install a curated subset of agents instead of the full 100-agent bundle. Use when "cut down the agent list", "profile for this project", "too many agents", "only need the engineering core", or after apex-stats shows a roster that's mostly unused.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tonone-ai/tonone762026년 10월 15일 업데이트

Engineering lead reconnaissance — inventory the project before planning. Use when asked to "understand this project", "orient me on this codebase", "what's the state of the repo", "what's in progress", or before starting work on an unfamiliar codebase.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

tonone-ai/tonone762026년 10월 15일 업데이트

tonone-ai의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고