본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

project-knowledge

Maintain a project's canonical terms and settled decisions that future work should reuse, and record follow-ups a session discovers but does not resolve. Use when project-specific terms are being clarified, when a choice that may constrain future work is being considered or settles, including during planning, or when a session applies a temporary workaround whose root cause stays open or observes an out-of-scope defect with evidence. Do not use for simple definitions, routine implementation details, or carrying out an already-settled decision.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

toy-crane/claude-code-playbook-template스타 77(GitHub 77 + cccskills 0)

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(8)

  • SKILL.md3.8 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml236 B
  • evals/evals.json7.2 KB
  • evals/fixtures/metro-cache-platform-leak.md1.1 KB
  • evals/trigger-evals.json6.3 KB
  • templates/decision-contract.md1.3 KB
  • templates/follow-up.md1.1 KB
  • templates/glossary.md991 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Project Knowledge

Resolve unclear project terms and preserve settled decisions so future work uses the same language and does not re-litigate the same trade-offs.

Resolve terms

Read GLOSSARY.md when it exists.

  • Resolve vague, overloaded, or conflicting project terms with the user.
  • Stress-test unclear relationships between domain concepts with concrete edge-case scenarios.
  • When a term is resolved, create GLOSSARY.md if needed and update it immediately using the glossary template.
  • Keep only project terms and their current definitions in GLOSSARY.md.

Preserve decisions

When docs/decisions/README.md exists, read it and load only the subject files relevant to the current work.

Record a project decision only when it is all of the following:

  1. Settled: the choice is no longer a proposal. The user confirmed the outcome, or it was chosen under authority the user explicitly delegated for this class of decision.
  2. Reusable: future work is likely to face the same question and should reuse this answer unless its reconsideration conditions are met.
  3. Non-obvious: without its rationale, future work could reasonably reopen the question or choose differently.
  4. A real trade-off: plausible alternatives existed, and preserving why they were rejected prevents the same evaluation from recurring.

Require evidence that a choice was intentional before treating it as settled. Implementation or lack of objection alone is insufficient.

For each qualifying decision, use the decision contract template to create or update its single subject file in docs/decisions/. Preserve only the context future work needs to apply the decision without repeating the original analysis.

Record follow-ups

Record a follow-up when a workaround applied in this session is temporary and its root cause stays open, or when an out-of-scope defect or suspected cause is observed with evidence. Work that closed inside the session, a guess without evidence, and a defect already fixed in the current change do not qualify.

Write each qualifying item at the moment of discovery to its own docs/follow-ups/<slug>.md using the follow-up template, naming the slug for the symptom. An item must let a later session act without this conversation. Reporting the discovery in conversation does not preserve it.

A follow-up records an open question, not a settled decision, so it does not enter GLOSSARY.md or a decision contract until its outcome settles on its own terms. Delete the file when the work ships or the item is promoted into a spec folder.

Protect project truth

  • If code conflicts with the user's statement, GLOSSARY.md, or a relevant decision contract, surface the mismatch instead of choosing silently. Code shows current behavior, but not whether that behavior was intentional.
  • A request to align documentation with code does not by itself confirm the decision the code implies.
  • If relevant sources disagree about a settled decision, leave project knowledge unchanged until the intent is explicitly clarified.
  • Treat a term or decision as preserved only after its target file is updated.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Audit and establish current agent context for the technologies that define a project's stack. Use when setting up a project for agent work, after selecting or adding a framework, library, developer tool, or hosted service, or when entering an existing project whose agent context has not been audited.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

toy-crane/claude-code-playbook-template772026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Revise active `docs/specs/SLUG/` specs so they match what has shipped since they were written. Use when earlier work has landed and queued specs may now rest on stale assumptions, acceptance criteria, constraints, terms, or prototypes, or when implementation reports a spec as stale before changing source. Takes one or more spec folders, or every folder under `docs/specs/` when none is named. Do not use to shape a new spec from a problem and direction, which belongs to `shape-idea`, or to reconcile durable project context and retire shipped folders, which belongs to `maintain-project-context`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

toy-crane/claude-code-playbook-template772026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Build a complete dummy-data HTML prototype or a temporary comparison of up to three alternatives for a specific user situation. Use to settle a screen-based product before implementation or resolve a visual or interaction decision during shaping or prototype review. Do not use for production implementation or CLI, terminal, or voice interfaces.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

toy-crane/claude-code-playbook-template772026년 10월 21일 업데이트

commit

무료

Create Git commits for the current request's in-scope changes as logical Conventional Commits. Always use this skill for an actual Git commit operation, including requests to commit or amend changes, save work in repository history, stage and record selected files, or group staged or unstaged changes into commits. Use it even when the request describes recording changes without saying "commit"; it performs the commit rather than only suggesting a message, and it does not push.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

toy-crane/claude-code-playbook-template772026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Interview the user to define or revise the app's overall product direction, then preserve the confirmed meaning in root PRODUCT.md. Always use for a new app direction or any app-wide change to users, usage situations, problem, promised change, core loop, durable boundaries, experience principles, success signals, assumptions, or unknowns, even when PRODUCT.md is not named. Start from an existing definition or a rough app direction. Do not use for blank-page idea discovery, architecture, or shaping or specifying one feature or work unit.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

toy-crane/claude-code-playbook-template772026년 10월 21일 업데이트

Render an explanation as a diagram, comparison, trace with real values, or annotated code. Use when the user asks to have a concept, decision, flow, or code explained, or says they do not follow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

toy-crane/claude-code-playbook-template772026년 10월 21일 업데이트

toy-crane의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고