Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
실행 점수 미검증
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Apply these test-quality rules during each red → green cycle.
Read GLOSSARY.md, then use docs/decisions/README.md to load only the decision
subjects relevant to the behavior under test. If code, spec, and a decision
contract conflict at the decision level, surface the conflict instead of
silently choosing one. Use current terms in test names and public interfaces.
Test behavior through public interfaces so internal refactoring does not break tests. Use specification-style names that state the capability under test.
Mock only at system boundaries such as external APIs, time, and randomness; prefer a real test database over a mocked one.
A seam is the public boundary where a test observes behavior without reaching into internals.
Reuse an existing seam before creating one. Create a seam only for a stable use case or domain concept, not an implementation helper whose name may change.
Select test seams from the agreed behavior and existing public interfaces, prioritizing critical paths and complex logic. Briefly state the chosen seam and the behavior it will verify, then proceed with the first test.
Resolve technical uncertainty through repository evidence. Ask the user only when the expected behavior remains unclear or proceeding would change the agreed product contract.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Audit and establish current agent context for the technologies that define a project's stack. Use when setting up a project for agent work, after selecting or adding a framework, library, developer tool, or hosted service, or when entering an existing project whose agent context has not been audited.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Revise active `docs/specs/SLUG/` specs so they match what has shipped since they were written. Use when earlier work has landed and queued specs may now rest on stale assumptions, acceptance criteria, constraints, terms, or prototypes, or when implementation reports a spec as stale before changing source. Takes one or more spec folders, or every folder under `docs/specs/` when none is named. Do not use to shape a new spec from a problem and direction, which belongs to `shape-idea`, or to reconcile durable project context and retire shipped folders, which belongs to `maintain-project-context`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build a complete dummy-data HTML prototype or a temporary comparison of up to three alternatives for a specific user situation. Use to settle a screen-based product before implementation or resolve a visual or interaction decision during shaping or prototype review. Do not use for production implementation or CLI, terminal, or voice interfaces.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create Git commits for the current request's in-scope changes as logical Conventional Commits. Always use this skill for an actual Git commit operation, including requests to commit or amend changes, save work in repository history, stage and record selected files, or group staged or unstaged changes into commits. Use it even when the request describes recording changes without saying "commit"; it performs the commit rather than only suggesting a message, and it does not push.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Interview the user to define or revise the app's overall product direction, then preserve the confirmed meaning in root PRODUCT.md. Always use for a new app direction or any app-wide change to users, usage situations, problem, promised change, core loop, durable boundaries, experience principles, success signals, assumptions, or unknowns, even when PRODUCT.md is not named. Start from an existing definition or a rough app direction. Do not use for blank-page idea discovery, architecture, or shaping or specifying one feature or work unit.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Render an explanation as a diagram, comparison, trace with real values, or annotated code. Use when the user asks to have a concept, decision, flow, or code explained, or says they do not follow.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.