본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

regression-sweep

Re-validates every previously-confirmed finding against its current target — detects drift (patched, mitigated, re-introduced). Cron-driven weekly sweep across the org's validated finding tree.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

transilienceai/communitytools스타 595(GitHub 595 + cccskills 0)

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(2)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB
  • reference/diff-normalization.md3.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Regression Sweep

Walk the entire validated/*.json tree, re-fire each finding's poc.py, compare output against the recorded poc_output.txt, and write a weekly drift report. Mounted onto the cloud-agent task #4.

Trigger

Cron weekly (default Mondays 02:00 UTC). May also be invoked ad-hoc after a major patch deployment.

Workflow

  1. Index validated findings. Glob validated/*.json and resolve each entry's FINDING_DIR (under findings/finding-NNN/).
  2. Per finding:
    • Re-run python3 poc.py with a 60-second timeout.
    • Capture stdout/stderr into findings/finding-NNN/evidence/validation/regression-{week}-rerun.txt.
    • Diff against findings/finding-NNN/evidence/validation/poc-rerun-output.txt (the validator's original re-run output) using a normalized line-set comparison (strip timestamps, request IDs, ephemeral tokens).
    • Re-check the finding's CVE via tools/nvd-lookup.py — has severity changed?
  3. Classify each finding into one of:
    • still_valid — re-run matches baseline within tolerance, CVSS unchanged.
    • drift_severity — re-run matches, but CVSS shifted ≥1.0 (NVD re-scored).
    • newly_invalid — re-run output diverges, exploit no longer fires. Likely patched.
    • newly_revalidated — finding had been marked REJECTED later, but now fires again. Regression.
    • inconclusive — re-run errored (network, target unreachable). Retry next sweep.
  4. Write report to artifacts/regression-{YYYYWww}.json + human-readable regression-{YYYYWww}.md. Transitions (newly_revalidated, drift_severity, newly_invalid) appear in the report under explicit headers for analyst review.

Output

{OUTPUT_DIR}/
  artifacts/
    regression-{YYYYWww}.json         # machine-readable result
    regression-{YYYYWww}.md           # human summary
  findings/finding-NNN/evidence/validation/
    regression-{YYYYWww}-rerun.txt    # captured re-run output

regression-{week}.json schema:

{
  "week": "2026W19",
  "swept_at": "2026-05-13T02:00:00Z",
  "counts": {"still_valid": 47, "drift_severity": 2, "newly_invalid": 5, "newly_revalidated": 1, "inconclusive": 3},
  "findings": [
    {"finding_id": "finding-012", "asset": "asset42", "cve": "CVE-2024-12345",
     "verdict": "newly_invalid", "reason": "PoC output diverged: response now 404",
     "baseline_cvss": 9.8, "current_cvss": 9.8}
  ]
}

Rules

  1. Demonstrate, never disrupt. Re-firing a PoC is observation, not mutation. Every poc.py already satisfied the demonstrate-only constraints at validation time (task-03 Safety section); the sweep simply re-executes the same script — which by contract reads a proof signal and exits. If a PoC at re-run attempts a mutating action it should not have contained originally, the sweep aborts that finding with inconclusive and emits a stderr WARN — the PoC needs re-validation, not regression scoring.
  2. Bounded per-PoC time. 60-second timeout per poc.py. Timeouts → inconclusive, not newly_invalid. Avoids false-positive "patched" claims caused by network blips.
  3. Normalized diff. Strip timestamps (\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}), request-IDs ([a-f0-9]{32,}), and ephemeral session tokens before comparing. Real exploit output is structurally stable.
  4. No new findings. A regression sweep can flip status of existing findings but cannot create new ones. Newly observed vulns belong to the Validation Run task, not this skill.
  5. Idempotent. Re-running the same week's sweep overwrites the same regression-{YYYYWww}.json. The per-finding regression-{week}-rerun.txt is timestamped to preserve history.
  6. Cap concurrent re-runs. Max 5 parallel PoC re-runs per sweep to avoid hammering production assets.

References

  • reference/diff-normalization.md — full normalization rules and per-finding output-stability heuristics.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Offensive AI security testing and exploitation framework. Systematically tests LLM applications for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities including prompt injection, model extraction, data poisoning, and supply chain attacks. Integrates with pentest workflows to discover and exploit AI-specific threats.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

transilienceai/communitytools5952026년 7월 30일 업데이트

API security testing - GraphQL, REST API, WebSocket, and Web-LLM attack techniques.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

transilienceai/communitytools5952026년 7월 30일 업데이트

Stitches confirmed single-asset findings into multi-hop attack paths across the organization. Builds a graph where nodes are assets and edges are confirmed exploit hops citing the findings that enable them.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

transilienceai/communitytools5952026년 7월 30일 업데이트

Acquire an authenticated session THROUGH MFA/OTP on an in-scope target and emit a reusable session artifact (Playwright storageState + Bearer) so executors can test the post-auth attack surface. Use when the highest-value authenticated classes (BOLA/IDOR/mass-assignment/injection on the real data APIs) are blocked because login is gated by SMS-OTP or TOTP MFA. Distinct from the authentication skill (which ATTACKS auth); this one legitimately authenticates and hands the session to the rest of the engagement.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

transilienceai/communitytools5952026년 7월 30일 업데이트

Authentication security testing - auth bypass, JWT attacks, OAuth flaws, password attacks, 2FA bypass, CAPTCHA bypass, and bot detection evasion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

transilienceai/communitytools5952026년 7월 30일 업데이트

Smart contract security testing and blockchain CTF exploitation. Covers Solidity vulnerability analysis, EVM storage manipulation, delegatecall attacks, CREATE/CREATE2 address prediction, and common DeFi exploit patterns. Use when analyzing Solidity contracts, solving blockchain challenges, or testing smart contract security.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

transilienceai/communitytools5952026년 7월 30일 업데이트

transilienceai의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고