본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

ship-it

Take a pull request through repeated code review and fixes, verify that automated checks pass for the latest commit, and combine its changes into one commit when merging. Conflicts with the request’s goal require confirmation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Take a PR from review to merged — run the repo's code-review skill on it in a loop (review, fix, re-review) until nothing is left to fix, applying ALL fixes on the PR branch, wait for CI green, then squash-merge. Use when asked to "ship it", "ship PR

연동 도구GitHub
설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Reviewing, fixing, and merging a pull request
  • Resolving every review finding, including minor issues
  • Checking CI results for the commit being merged
  • Verifying fork contributions before merging

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md10.2 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Ship It

Input: a PR number or URL, or nothing — then use the current branch's PR (gh pr view with no argument resolves it). If the current branch has no PR yet, push it and open one with gh pr create (maintainer branch only), then continue. Goal: the PR merged with every code-review finding fixed and CI green.

0b. A figure in the description, when the change has a shape

If the PR changes how something flows — a request path, a background job, what a feature does step by step — a picture explains it faster than the diff does. Use the figure skill: write a JSON spec, render one animated SVG, and put it at the top of the PR description. It plays in the description with no upload and no click.

Reference it by commit SHA, not branch name, or the image dies when the branch is deleted at merge: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/<owner>/<repo>/<sha>/<path>.svg. If the SVG is not part of the change itself, don't commit it to the repo — render it, commit it on the PR branch only if it belongs there, and otherwise keep the description's image pinned to the commit that carried it.

Skip it for a fix with no shape: a one-line guard, a dependency bump, a typo.

0. Blocker rule (applies at every step)

A blocker is a finding whose fix would go against the PR's goal — the code-review principles say the thing the PR sets out to do is wrong (e.g. the PR's whole point is a raw-SQL handler, a new advisory lock, a tuple-returning API, a test that asserts via SQL, dropping bank scoping), or fixing it would mean rewriting/removing the feature rather than polishing it.

On a blocker: stop immediately. Don't push, don't merge, don't partially fix. Tell the user what the PR is trying to do, which principle it conflicts with (quote the code-review section), and the options you see — then ask for confirmation with AskUserQuestion. Resume only on an explicit answer.

Everything else (must fix, should fix, nits) is not a blocker: fix it all.

0c. Track everything you start (applies at every step)

Whatever you launch to verify the PR — API, worker, control plane, docs server, a pg0 instance — you must stop yourself at the end (step 7), without touching anyone else's. Other Hindsight worktrees, servers and pytest runs share this machine.

  • Start background processes so you know their PID (run_in_background, or cmd & echo $!) and write each one down. Note the ports you picked.
  • Need a database? Give it a new, unique pg0 instance name (e.g. HINDSIGHT_API_DATABASE_URL=pg0://ship-it-pr-<N>) and write down that you created it. If you reuse an instance that already existed (check pg0 list first), write down that it is shared.
  • Never pkill -f hindsight, pkill -f pytest, killall, or kill by port without checking the PID is one of yours. Those hit other sessions.

1. Load the PR

Read the PR — title, body, linked issue, diff — so you know its goal; the blocker rule depends on it. If it's CONFLICTING, rebase onto origin/main first: a conflicting PR gets zero CI runs, silently.

Work out whether the author is a maintainer (write/maintain/admin on the repo, e.g. nicoloboschi).

2. Check out the PR branch

Work in the current worktree — don't create a new worktree or clone. Before switching, note its state (current branch/commit and any uncommitted changes) so you can restore it in step 6; set uncommitted work aside with a WIP commit or a uniquely tagged stash (never a bare git stash — the stash stack is shared across worktrees). Then check out the PR's branch (skip if you're already on it). On current-branch input, ask the user if uncommitted work isn't obviously part of the PR.

  • Maintainer PR: fixes are committed and pushed to this branch — the PR's own head. Never open a separate fix PR.
  • External (fork) PR: push to the fork branch too if maintainers can modify it; otherwise stop and ask the user how to proceed (follow-up PR vs. ask the contributor).

Before every push, make sure the author hasn't pushed meanwhile. If they have, read their new commits and rebase yours onto their head — never force-push over work you haven't read.

3. Review

Read and follow the repo's code-review skill at its absolute path, <repo>/.claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.md (<repo> = git rev-parse --show-toplevel), against the PR's changes (base = origin/<baseRefName>). Collect every finding: must fix, should fix, and nits.

Classify each against step 0. Any blocker → stop and ask.

4. Apply ALL fixes

  • Fix every finding, not just the must-fixes. Stay in the PR's scope — don't refactor neighbouring code the review didn't flag.
  • Run ./scripts/hooks/lint.sh and the tests covering the touched code (see CLAUDE.md for commands). Regenerate OpenAPI/clients/docs-skill if the change requires it.
  • Loop until clean. One review pass is never enough: fixes introduce new findings, and the review only sees what the last pass changed. So repeat — review → fix everything → review again — until a full code-review pass returns zero findings of any severity (must fix, should fix, nits). Don't stop at "only nits left", don't stop because the last pass found fewer things, and don't declare done on a pass you didn't actually re-run. The only early exit is a blocker (step 0) → stop and ask.
  • Follow-up work is done here, not later. If the PR needs more to be complete — a missing piece the review or you found, a doc page, a client regen, a test — do it in this ship-it, on this branch. "Follow-up PR" is not an option for work that belongs to this change. Only work that is truly a different problem goes to an issue (step 7).
  • Commit with a message that lists what was fixed, then push to the PR branch.

Don't post a review comment on a maintainer's PR — findings go in the chat reply and the commit message. On an external PR, one short comment summarising the fixes you pushed is fine.

5. Wait for CI green

The repo has no required status checks: gh pr merge --auto merges immediately, and gh pr checks reports only the checks registered so far (a lone early Strix check reads as "green"). Gate on the CI workflow run for the pushed head SHA:

SHA=$(gh pr view <N> --json headRefOid --jq .headRefOid)
gh run list --branch <headRefName> --workflow CI --json databaseId,status,conclusion,headSha \
  | jq --arg s "$SHA" 'map(select(.headSha==$s)) | .[0] // empty'

No run yet → keep waiting (give up and report after ~15 min with no run). Once completed, judge per job (gh run view <id> --json jobs): zero failure. If the PR touches the API/engine, test-api (1..3/3), Core LLM tests, and the LLM acceptance matrix must be success, not skipped; for changes outside those paths the change filter skips them legitimately. The oracle-client jobs are known-flaky and may be cancelled — ignore those.

Fork PRs skip test-api and the LLM jobs (no secrets). Run the full suite on an upstream branch before merging — merging to main runs no CI at all:

git push origin HEAD:ci/pr-<N>-verify
gh workflow run CI --ref ci/pr-<N>-verify   # exactly ONCE — a second dispatch cancels the first

A failure caused by the PR/fixes → fix, push, back to step 5. A known flake (check the job log isn't touching the PR's code) → gh run rerun <id> --failed once the run has completed. If CI still fails for reasons you can't attribute, stop and report — don't merge red.

6. Restore the worktree, then merge

First restore the worktree to how you found it: switch back to the original branch/commit and re-apply any work you set aside (undo the WIP commit / apply-then-drop your tagged stash). Do the same if you stop early on a blocker or failure. Restoring first also keeps --delete-branch from trying to check out main, which another worktree may hold.

gh pr merge <N> --squash --delete-branch
git push origin --delete ci/pr-<N>-verify   # if you created it

7. Clean up, file issues, report

Do this also when you stop early (blocker, red CI).

Stop what you started — only that. Kill each PID you wrote down in step 0c (kill <pid>; check it's gone, kill -9 <pid> only if it hangs). Before killing, confirm with ps -p <pid> -o command= that it is still your process. For each pg0 instance:

  • Created for this ship-it → pg0 drop --name <name> -f (stops it and deletes its data).
  • Shared / already existed → don't touch it. Not stop, not drop.

Then check nothing of yours is left: lsof -nP -iTCP:<port> -sTCP:LISTEN for each port you used.

File issues for real project problems you ran into. While reviewing, testing or waiting on CI you may have hit problems that are not this PR's job and not your local setup: a flaky test, a bug in nearby code, a broken script, wrong docs, a CI job that is always red. For each one:

  1. Search first so you don't duplicate: gh issue list --state open --search "<keywords>".
  2. If none exists, create it: gh issue create --title ... --body .... Body: what happens, how to see it (command or steps), what should happen, and where in the code. Keep it short.

Local problems (your env, missing tools, a port in use, a stale .env) are not issues — mention them in the report only if the user needs to act.

Report:

  • PR link and the CI run that gated the merge.
  • The findings fixed (one line each), and anything deliberately left, with why.
  • Issues found on the project — a clearly marked section listing each issue you created (link + one line), and any existing issue you found instead of creating one. Say "none" if none.
  • What you stopped and dropped, and any shared pg0 instance you left alone.

Note on gh pr edit

It fails on this repo — a GraphQL "Projects (classic)" deprecation aborts it and nothing changes, silently. To edit a description use the REST API instead:

gh api -X PATCH repos/<owner>/<repo>/pulls/<N> -F body=@body.md

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Record task handoffs between Bots in shared Hindsight memory, including progress, remaining work, sources, and caveats. Other Bots can retrieve the record later, continue unfinished work, and report the outcome back through shared memory.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Handing unfinished work to another Bot
  • Resuming a task started by another Bot
  • Sharing findings with Bots outside the current conversation
vectorize-io/hindsight5.2만2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Review changed code against project rules and report missing tests, unused code, typing problems, and style violations. It also checks API design and data isolation, helping developers identify issues after implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Reviewing changes after implementation
  • Finding missing tests and unused code
  • Checking Python types and API design
vectorize-io/hindsight5.2만2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Create a specialized Claude Code subagent with Hindsight long-term memory. Start with an empty agent or import prepared documents, then equip it with knowledge pages and memory search to reuse information across sessions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Create a specialized agent that remembers across sessions
  • Build an agent from prepared reference documents
  • Start an empty agent and add knowledge over time
vectorize-io/hindsight5.2만2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

figure

무료

Create an animated diagram showing request flows, background jobs, or feature changes. The result is a single SVG image for README files, pull requests, issues, or blog posts, with support for light and dark themes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Explaining request and data flows
  • Illustrating how a background job works
  • Showing feature changes in a pull request
vectorize-io/hindsight5.2만2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Plan how an AI application should use Hindsight memory. Identify useful information to retain, define user-scoping tags and memory bank settings, and specify how retrieved facts and synthesized knowledge should reach the model.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Plan memory that carries conversation context across sessions
  • Design tags that separate each user's memories
  • Plan summaries of customer preferences and recurring issues
vectorize-io/hindsight5.2만2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Store project conventions, task outcomes, and troubleshooting lessons in a shared Hindsight Cloud memory bank. Retrieve relevant context before new work, or synthesize past experience to guide decisions and help teammates reuse what has been learned.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Save project coding and testing conventions
  • Share failure causes, fixes, and workarounds
  • Retrieve related lessons before starting a task
vectorize-io/hindsight5.2만2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

vectorize-io의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고