본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

Trust Decay

Capture a confident agent claim (Phase 1) or resolve one as right/wrong (Phase 2) in vault/memory/TRUST_DECAY.md. Builds the longitudinal record of agent calibration over time. Pairs with /honesty-check (which should reduce Phase 1 frequency) and /diagnose (which surfaces causes that often reveal Phase 2 events).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

wrg32786/aigent-os스타 25(GitHub 25 + cccskills 0)

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.9 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Trust Decay

The two-phase ledger that tracks confident agent claims and their eventual outcomes. See [[Cost of Confidence]] for the doctrine.

When to use

Phase 1 — Capture a confident claim

  • An agent declared something "fixed", "tested", "verified", "complete", "deployed"
  • The claim is unhedged or treated as ground truth
  • The claim is consequential enough that being wrong about it would matter
  • Triggered by Caddy on prompts like: "/trust-decay capture", "log this claim", "capture confidence", "agent claimed", "I claimed", "the agent said it was fixed", "another agent verified"

Phase 2 — Resolve a claim

  • A previously-captured claim has been confirmed (right) or revealed wrong
  • The principal noticed a discrepancy between an earlier claim and reality
  • Triggered by Caddy on prompts like: "/trust-decay resolve", "the bug came back", "that wasn't actually fixed", "trust event", "wrong claim", "confidence was wrong"

How to execute

Phase 1 — Capture

## YYYY-MM-DD — {short claim summary}
**Claim:** "{the actual confident statement, verbatim}"
**Source:** {agent name or self}
**Context:** {what task, what session, what was being worked on}
**Verification stated:** {what the claimant said they verified, if anything}
**Status:** OPEN — awaiting outcome

Append to vault/memory/TRUST_DECAY.md under the "Open" section.

The principal can capture manually, OR /honesty-check (when wired) can auto-capture any unhedged confident claim it produces.

Phase 2 — Resolve

When a previously-captured claim is proved or disproved:

  1. Find the open entry in vault/memory/TRUST_DECAY.md matching the claim
  2. Append resolution data:
**Resolution (YYYY-MM-DD):** WRONG | PARTIALLY WRONG | CONFIRMED CORRECT
**Evidence:** {what surfaced the discrepancy — file/line/log/observation}
**Time-to-discovery:** {duration from claim to discovery}
**Trust-decay event:** YES | NO
**Pattern:** {one line — what category of mistake/correctness was this?}
  1. Move the entry from the "Open" section to the "Resolved" section.

Step 3 — Optional aggregate

If the principal asks for the trust trajectory, walk the ledger and compute:

Trust trajectory ({start date} → {end date}):
- Total claims captured: N
- Confirmed correct: M (X%)
- Wrong: P (Y%)
- Partially wrong: Q (Z%)

By category:
- Doc work: X/Y correct
- Infrastructure: ...
- Production fixes: ...

Recurring patterns:
- {pattern name}: occurred N times — promote to /diagnose checks?

This output becomes the basis for /retro analysis and feeds into the [[Common Failure Modes]] corpus.

Why two phases

The pairing is the whole point. A confident claim with no resolution is just rhetoric. A wrong outcome with no original claim is just a bug. The pair — confident claim, then disconfirmation — is what measures calibration.

Anti-patterns this prevents

  • Forgetting that the agent claimed something was fixed three weeks ago when the same bug recurs (no audit trail)
  • Treating every fresh occurrence of an old bug as new (no pattern detection)
  • Letting agent confidence levels drift without a corrective signal (no calibration data)
  • Blaming the agent in the moment without realizing it's the Nth time the same pattern has played out (no longitudinal context)

What this skill is NOT

  • Not a punishment system. The ledger calibrates the agent's claims against outcomes. It's measurement, not judgment.
  • Not adversarial. Capturing a confident claim isn't accusing the agent of being wrong; it's noting what the agent said so the eventual outcome can pair with it.
  • Not the only place to track confidence. [[Honesty Check]] is the agent-side discipline; [[Reading Agent Output Defensively]] is the principal-side discipline; this skill is the longitudinal data layer that makes both useful over time.

Connects to

  • [[Cost of Confidence]] — the doctrine note this skill instantiates
  • [[Honesty Check]] — should reduce Phase 1 capture frequency over time (fewer unhedged claims = fewer entries to resolve later)
  • [[Reading Agent Output Defensively]] — the principal-side pattern that often triggers a Phase 1 capture
  • [[Common Failure Modes]] — sister corpus tracking layer-level failures rather than confidence-level failures
  • vault/memory/TRUST_DECAY.md — the ledger file
  • Closing the Measurement Loop — the Stop hook that prompts a Phase 1 capture when a turn's confident claims went unrecorded
  • /retro (forthcoming v0.3) — quarterly analysis that consumes this ledger

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Track and surface sub-agent dispatch calibration ratios. Extract from JSONL transcript or read existing ledger. Per-agent clean/blocked/errored/partial trends.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

wrg32786/aigent-os252026년 10월 29일 업데이트

Compose the AIgent's body state by reading existing signals. Lazy compute. Never polled. Reports the five pressures + recommended reflex.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

wrg32786/aigent-os252026년 10월 29일 업데이트

brief

무료

Generate a structured delegation brief for any task

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

wrg32786/aigent-os252026년 10월 29일 업데이트

Quarterly skill that walks the skill-index against the actual SKILL.md files on disk, reports drift (skills indexed that no longer exist, skills on disk that aren't enrolled, skills whose descriptions have changed since enrollment). Hardens the auto-enrollment pipeline against silent rot.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

wrg32786/aigent-os252026년 10월 29일 업데이트

When a [CADDY] hint fires and the principal is confused why, /caddy-explain walks the scoring transparently — which trigger matched, what points it earned, what the threshold was, what other skills were close. Pairs with the legibility thesis. Caddy's decisions should be inspectable on demand.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

wrg32786/aigent-os252026년 10월 29일 업데이트

Enroll a skill into Caddy's index so it can be surfaced when the right prompt arrives. Use when a new skill is created, copied in, or when a skill needs updated triggers. Usage — "/caddy-enroll <path to SKILL.md>".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

wrg32786/aigent-os252026년 10월 29일 업데이트

wrg32786의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고