본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

competitive-intel

Compare brands and products across social media — share of voice, sentiment, positioning, and audience overlap using Xpoz. Use when asked to "compare brands", "competitive analysis", "share of voice", "brand vs brand", or "competitive intelligence".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md13.1 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Competitive Intelligence

Overview

Compare multiple brands or products side by side across Twitter/X, Reddit, and Instagram. Measure share of voice, compare sentiment, identify positioning differences, and discover competitive advantages from real social conversations.

When to Use

Activate when the user asks:

  • "Compare [BRAND A] vs [BRAND B] on social media"
  • "Share of voice: [BRAND] vs competitors"
  • "Competitive analysis for [PRODUCT]"
  • "How does [BRAND A] sentiment compare to [BRAND B]?"
  • "What are people saying about [BRAND] vs [COMPETITOR]?"

Setup & Authentication

Before fetching data, ensure Xpoz access is configured. Follow these checks in order.

Check 1: Already authenticated?

If you have MCP tools, try calling any Xpoz tool (e.g., checkAccessKeyStatus). If it works → skip to Step 1.

If you have the SDK, try:

from xpoz import XpozClient
client = XpozClient()  # reads XPOZ_API_KEY env var

If this succeeds without error → skip to Step 1.

If neither works, you need to authenticate. Get a free access key (below).


Recommended: a free access key

Real analyses need a real key: get a free access key (free tier, up to 75K results, no credit card). SDK and CLI users set it as XPOZ_API_KEY; MCP connections sign in with the same account via OAuth on first tool call (paths below).


Path A: MCP via mcporter (OpenClaw agents)

If mcporter is available:

mcporter call xpoz.checkAccessKeyStatus

If hasAccessKey: true → ready. If not:

mcporter config add xpoz https://mcp.xpoz.ai/mcp --auth oauth

Then authenticate — generate the OAuth URL and send it to the user:

Step 1: Generate authorization URL

import secrets, hashlib, base64, urllib.parse, json, urllib.request, os

verifier = secrets.token_urlsafe(64)
challenge = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(hashlib.sha256(verifier.encode()).digest()).rstrip(b'=').decode()
state = secrets.token_urlsafe(32)

# Dynamic client registration
reg_req = urllib.request.Request(
    'https://mcp.xpoz.ai/oauth/register',
    data=json.dumps({
        'client_name': 'Agent Skills',
        'redirect_uris': ['https://www.xpoz.ai/oauth/openclaw'],
        'grant_types': ['authorization_code'],
        'response_types': ['code'],
        'token_endpoint_auth_method': 'none',
    }).encode(),
    headers={'Content-Type': 'application/json'},
)
reg_resp = json.loads(urllib.request.urlopen(reg_req).read())

params = urllib.parse.urlencode({
    'response_type': 'code',
    'client_id': reg_resp['client_id'],
    'code_challenge': challenge,
    'code_challenge_method': 'S256',
    'redirect_uri': 'https://www.xpoz.ai/oauth/openclaw',
    'state': state,
    'scope': 'mcp:tools',
    'resource': 'https://mcp.xpoz.ai/',
})

auth_url = 'https://mcp.xpoz.ai/oauth/authorize?' + params

# Save state for token exchange
os.makedirs(os.path.expanduser('~/.cache/xpoz-oauth'), exist_ok=True)
with open(os.path.expanduser('~/.cache/xpoz-oauth/state.json'), 'w') as f:
    json.dump({'verifier': verifier, 'state': state, 'client_id': reg_resp['client_id'],
               'redirect_uri': 'https://www.xpoz.ai/oauth/openclaw'}, f)

print(auth_url)

Step 2: Send the URL to the user

Tell them:

"I need to connect to Xpoz for social media data. Please open this link and sign in:

[auth_url]

After authorizing, you'll see a code. Paste it back to me here."

Step 3: WAIT for the user to reply with the code. Do not proceed until they respond.

Step 4: Exchange the code for a token

Once the user provides the code (either a raw code or a URL containing ?code=...), extract the code and exchange it:

import json, urllib.request, urllib.parse, subprocess, os

with open(os.path.expanduser('~/.cache/xpoz-oauth/state.json')) as f:
    oauth = json.load(f)

code = "THE_CODE_FROM_USER"  # Extract from user's reply

data = urllib.parse.urlencode({
    'grant_type': 'authorization_code',
    'code': code,
    'redirect_uri': oauth['redirect_uri'],
    'client_id': oauth['client_id'],
    'code_verifier': oauth['verifier'],
}).encode()

req = urllib.request.Request(
    'https://mcp.xpoz.ai/oauth/token',
    data=data,
    headers={'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'},
)
resp = json.loads(urllib.request.urlopen(req).read())
token = resp['access_token']

# Configure mcporter with the token (token is never printed)
subprocess.run(['mcporter', 'config', 'remove', 'xpoz'], capture_output=True)
subprocess.run(['mcporter', 'config', 'add', 'xpoz', 'https://mcp.xpoz.ai/mcp',
                '--header', f'Authorization=Bearer {token}'], check=True)

# Clean up
os.remove(os.path.expanduser('~/.cache/xpoz-oauth/state.json'))
print("Xpoz configured successfully")

Step 5: Verify with mcporter call xpoz.checkAccessKeyStatus → should return hasAccessKey: true.


Path B: MCP via Claude Code

For Claude Code users without mcporter:

claude mcp add --transport http xpoz https://mcp.xpoz.ai/mcp

Claude Code handles OAuth automatically on first tool call — the user just needs to authorize in their browser when prompted.


Path C: SDK (Python or TypeScript)

Ask the user:

"I need a Xpoz API key to access social media data. Please go to https://xpoz.ai/get-token (it's free, no credit card needed) and paste the key back to me."

WAIT for the user to reply with the key. Then:

Python:

pip install xpoz
from xpoz import XpozClient
client = XpozClient("THE_KEY_FROM_USER")

TypeScript:

npm install @xpoz/xpoz
import { XpozClient } from "@xpoz/xpoz";
const client = new XpozClient({ apiKey: "THE_KEY_FROM_USER" });
await client.connect();

Or set the environment variable and use the default constructor:

export XPOZ_API_KEY=THE_KEY_FROM_USER

Auth Errors

ProblemSolution
MCP: "Unauthorized"Re-run the OAuth flow above
SDK: AuthenticationErrorVerify key at xpoz.ai/settings
Token exchange failsAsk user to re-authorize — codes are single-use

Step-by-Step Instructions

Step 1: Parse the Request

Extract:

  • Primary brand and competitors (2-5 brands total)
  • Platforms (default: Twitter + Reddit)
  • Time period (default: last 7 days)
  • Industry context for better analysis

Build expanded queries for each brand:

  • "Slack" → "Slack" NOT "cut some slack" NOT "slack off"
  • "Discord" → "Discord" NOT "sow discord" NOT "discord between"
  • For stocks: include ticker symbols

Step 2: Fetch Data for Each Brand

Run parallel searches — one per brand, per platform.

Via MCP

For each brand, call:

Twitter posts:

Call getTwitterPostsByKeywords:
  query: "<brand query>"
  fields: ["id", "text", "authorUsername", "createdAtDate", "likeCount", "retweetCount", "impressionCount"]
  startDate: "<7 days ago>"
  endDate: "<today>"
  language: "en"

Twitter users discussing the brand:

Call getTwitterUsersByKeywords:
  query: "<brand query>"
  fields: ["id", "username", "name", "followersCount", "relevantTweetsCount", "relevantTweetsLikesSum"]
  startDate: "<7 days ago>"

Reddit (for each brand):

Call getRedditPostsByKeywords:
  query: "<brand query>"
  fields: ["id", "title", "text", "score", "numComments", "subreddit", "createdAtDate"]
  startDate: "<7 days ago>"

CRITICAL: Each call returns an operationId — poll checkOperationStatus until "completed".

Tip: Launch all brand searches in sequence, collect all operationIds, then poll them. This is faster than waiting for each one.

Via Python SDK

from xpoz import XpozClient

client = XpozClient()

brands = {
    "Slack": '"Slack" NOT "cut some slack"',
    "Discord": '"Discord" NOT "sow discord"',
    "Teams": '"Microsoft Teams" OR "MS Teams"',
}

brand_data = {}

for brand_name, query in brands.items():
    # Twitter posts
    twitter = client.twitter.search_posts(
        query,
        start_date="2026-02-16",
        end_date="2026-02-23",
        language="en",
        fields=["id", "text", "author_username", "like_count", "retweet_count", "impression_count", "created_at_date"]
    )

    # Twitter users (for influencer overlap analysis)
    users = client.twitter.get_users_by_keywords(
        query,
        start_date="2026-02-16",
        fields=["username", "followers_count", "relevant_tweets_count", "relevant_tweets_likes_sum"]
    )

    # Reddit posts
    reddit = client.reddit.search_posts(
        query,
        start_date="2026-02-16",
        fields=["id", "title", "text", "score", "num_comments", "subreddit", "created_at_date"]
    )

    brand_data[brand_name] = {
        "twitter_posts": twitter,
        "twitter_users": users,
        "reddit_posts": reddit,
        "tweet_count": twitter.pagination.total_rows,
        "reddit_count": reddit.pagination.total_rows,
    }

client.close()

Via TypeScript SDK

import { XpozClient } from "@xpoz/xpoz";

const client = new XpozClient();
await client.connect();

const brands: Record<string, string> = {
  Slack: '"Slack" NOT "cut some slack"',
  Discord: '"Discord" NOT "sow discord"',
  Teams: '"Microsoft Teams" OR "MS Teams"',
};

const brandData: Record<string, any> = {};

for (const [name, query] of Object.entries(brands)) {
  const twitter = await client.twitter.searchPosts(query, {
    startDate: "2026-02-16",
    endDate: "2026-02-23",
    language: "en",
    fields: ["id", "text", "authorUsername", "likeCount", "retweetCount", "createdAtDate"],
  });

  const reddit = await client.reddit.searchPosts(query, {
    startDate: "2026-02-16",
    fields: ["id", "title", "text", "score", "numComments", "subreddit"],
  });

  brandData[name] = { twitter, reddit };
}

await client.close();

Step 3: Analyze and Compare

Share of Voice (SOV):

SOV for Brand A = (Brand A mentions) / (Total mentions across all brands) × 100

Calculate separately for Twitter and Reddit.

Sentiment Comparison: For each brand, classify posts into positive/neutral/negative (see social-sentiment-analyzer skill for classification method) and compare:

  • Overall sentiment score (0-100)
  • Positive/negative ratio
  • Sentiment trend over the time period

Engagement Comparison:

  • Average likes per post
  • Average comments/replies per post
  • Total impressions (Twitter)
  • Total Reddit score

Audience Overlap:

  • Find users who posted about multiple brands (common usernames across datasets)
  • These users are particularly valuable for understanding switching behavior

Positioning Analysis:

  • What attributes does each brand's audience associate with it?
  • What are the unique strengths/weaknesses mentioned for each?
  • Common comparison contexts ("I switched from X to Y because...")

Step 4: Generate Report

## Competitive Intelligence: [BRAND] vs Competitors
**Period:** [date range] | **Platforms:** Twitter, Reddit

### Share of Voice
| Brand | Twitter Posts | Reddit Posts | Total | SOV |
|-------|-------------|-------------|-------|-----|
| Slack | 1,234 | 456 | 1,690 | 42% |
| Discord | 890 | 678 | 1,568 | 39% |
| Teams | 456 | 321 | 777 | 19% |

### Sentiment Comparison
| Brand | Score | Positive | Neutral | Negative | Trend |
|-------|-------|----------|---------|----------|-------|
| Slack | 62 | 38% | 42% | 20% | → Stable |
| Discord | 71 | 48% | 35% | 17% | ↑ Improving |
| Teams | 45 | 22% | 45% | 33% | ↓ Declining |

### Engagement Comparison
| Brand | Avg Likes (Twitter) | Avg Score (Reddit) | Avg Comments |
|-------|--------------------|--------------------|--------------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... |

### Key Findings

#### [Brand A] Strengths
- [What people praise, with example quotes]

#### [Brand A] Weaknesses
- [What people complain about, with example quotes]

#### [Brand B] Strengths / Weaknesses
...

### Competitive Positioning Map
- **[Brand A]:** Positioned as [description]
- **[Brand B]:** Positioned as [description]
- **Switching signals:** [users switching from X to Y, with reasons]

### Audience Overlap
[X users posted about multiple brands — analysis of their preferences]

### Recommendations
[3-5 actionable insights based on the competitive landscape]

Example Prompts

  • "Compare Tesla vs Rivian vs Lucid on Twitter sentiment"
  • "Share of voice: Figma vs Sketch vs Adobe XD"
  • "Competitive analysis for Notion vs Obsidian vs Roam Research on Reddit"
  • "How does Claude sentiment compare to ChatGPT and Gemini?"

Notes

  • Expand brand names carefully to avoid false positives (common words need exclusions)
  • Reddit provides qualitative depth; Twitter provides quantitative breadth
  • Free access key: up to 75K results at xpoz.ai (no credit card); real runs need it
  • For large comparisons (5+ brands), use CSV exports and analyze locally with pandas/Excel

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Ask Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini a question and capture the full trace behind the answer (the search queries each engine ran, the pages it retrieved, and the sources it cited, span by span). Use when asked to "trace an AI answer", "see what AI engines cite", "check AI citations", "which sources does ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini use", "why does the AI recommend X", or for any GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) measurement.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

XPOZpublic/xpoz-agent-skills162026년 9월 9일 업데이트

Score an Instagram creator's (or a list of creators') audience authenticity and engagement quality using Xpoz. Measures real engagement rate against views rather than follower count, the bot/spam share of their comments, and an overall 0-100 authenticity score for influencer vetting and partner selection. Use when asked to "vet this influencer", "are their followers real", "check engagement quality for @username", "rate these Instagram accounts", "compare creators before a sponsorship", or when the user pastes a list of Instagram handles to evaluate.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

XPOZpublic/xpoz-agent-skills162026년 9월 9일 업데이트

Map the most influential Reddit venues for a brand's AI visibility using Xpoz. Finds which subreddits and threads AI engines actually cite when answering buyer questions, where those questions get asked, and which live threads are worth answering. Use when asked to "get cited by AI through Reddit", "which subreddits matter for my brand", "Reddit influence map", "where should we engage on Reddit", or "why does ChatGPT cite Reddit for my category".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

XPOZpublic/xpoz-agent-skills162026년 9월 9일 업데이트

One-shot GEO visibility check for a brand using Xpoz. Runs the buyer questions that matter through Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini, and reports where the brand appears, who wins instead, and which surfaces the answers are assembled from. Use when asked to "check my AI visibility", "does ChatGPT recommend us", "GEO audit", "where do we show up in AI answers", or "who wins our category in AI answers".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

XPOZpublic/xpoz-agent-skills162026년 9월 9일 업데이트

Find and rank influencers by niche, engagement, and authenticity using Xpoz. Searches Twitter, Instagram, and Reddit for active voices in any topic. Use when asked to "find influencers", "discover thought leaders", "who's talking about X", "influencer research", or "find KOLs".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

XPOZpublic/xpoz-agent-skills162026년 9월 9일 업데이트

Run a one-shot buying-intent lead scan across Reddit, Twitter/X, Instagram, and TikTok using Xpoz. Finds fresh posts from people actively looking for what a product does or frustrated with its competitors, classifies and prioritizes them, and reports where to engage and who to reach. Use when asked to "find leads", "who is asking for a tool like mine", "find people complaining about [COMPETITOR]", "buying-intent scan", or "social selling opportunities".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

XPOZpublic/xpoz-agent-skills162026년 9월 9일 업데이트

XPOZpublic의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고