본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

autopilot

Take an idea or issue through requirements clarification, reviewed planning, implementation, and verification. Supervise all stages in one recoverable OMX workflow, preserving artifacts and progress so work can resume or return to planning when findings require changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

[OMX] Canonical autonomous orchestrator: $deep-interview -> $ralplan -> $ultragoal

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Deliver an issue from requirements clarification through verification
  • Turn an initial idea into a reviewed implementation plan
  • Resume interrupted work from its saved phase
  • Revise a plan after review or QA findings

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md7.8 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Autopilot

<Purpose> Autopilot is the first-class canonical orchestrator for hands-off delivery. Its defining default chain is mandatory:
$deep-interview -> $ralplan -> $ultragoal

The chain is not a list of optional hints and Autopilot is not an alias for direct execution. Autopilot supervises each child stage in one recoverable session, carries durable artifacts forward, and continues through implementation verification until the requested outcome is complete or a genuine blocker is recorded. </Purpose>

<Use_When>

  • The user explicitly invokes $autopilot.
  • The user asks for end-to-end autonomous delivery from an idea, issue, or requirements seed.
  • The work needs requirements clarification, consensus planning, durable execution, and evidence-backed completion as one supervised workflow. </Use_When>

<Default_Chain> Run or resume these stages in order:

  1. deep-interview — clarify intent, scope, non-goals, constraints, acceptance criteria, and unresolved decisions. Produce a durable requirements/specification handoff. Deep Interview is a real stage; do not replace it with a one-question check or skip it merely because the task looks actionable.
  2. ralplan — turn the clarified requirements into an execution-ready consensus plan with architecture, sequencing, test, and verification guidance. Preserve review evidence as lifecycle evidence, not host-issued security authority.
  3. ultragoal — execute the approved plan through durable goals and ledger receipts, implementation, focused verification, cleanup, review, and terminal evidence.

$team, $code-review, and $ultraqa may be used inside the supervised execution when the active Ultragoal plan or verification boundary requires them. They do not replace or weaken the defining three-stage chain.

When review or QA proves the requirements or plan wrong, keep Autopilot active, return its supervised phase to ralplan, attach the findings, and continue through ultragoal again. Implementation-only review fixes may remain within Ultragoal's blocker/review loop. </Default_Chain>

<Execution_Policy>

  • Autopilot MUST begin at deep-interview for a new run and MUST preserve the phase order deep-interview -> ralplan -> ultragoal.
  • Child stages are supervised phases, not peer workflow activations. Keep mode:"autopilot" active and update current_phase rather than replacing Autopilot with standalone child state.
  • Use the current CLI state SSOT (omx state ... --json) and the current session-scoped state root. Do not create a second writer or revive legacy root-state authority.
  • Local artifacts, prompts, trackers, transcripts, environment values, and role labels are lifecycle evidence only. Do not reintroduce the retired unrecoverable host-receipt lock or terminalize the workflow because host provenance is unavailable.
  • Authority-decreasing operations are always recoverable: $cancel, state clear, hook disable/uninstall recovery, and stale-state repair must remain available without completion receipts or child-stage approval.
  • Continue automatically through safe, reversible stage transitions. Stop only for an explicit user cancellation, a human-only dependency, or a verified terminal result. </Execution_Policy>

<State_Management> Autopilot state is session-scoped and owned by the canonical state writer. A new run records at least:

{
  "mode": "autopilot",
  "active": true,
  "current_phase": "deep-interview",
  "iteration": 1,
  "phase_cycle": ["deep-interview", "ralplan", "ultragoal"],
  "handoff_artifacts": {
    "deep_interview": null,
    "ralplan": null,
    "ultragoal": null
  },
  "return_to_ralplan_reason": null
}

Start or update state only through the CLI-first state surface:

omx state write --input '{"mode":"autopilot","active":true,"current_phase":"deep-interview","state":{"phase_cycle":["deep-interview","ralplan","ultragoal"],"handoff_artifacts":{"deep_interview":null,"ralplan":null,"ultragoal":null},"return_to_ralplan_reason":null}}' --json

Stage transitions:

  • deep-interview -> ralplan: require a durable clarified requirements/specification artifact and a non-empty completion rationale. Preserve same-session question evidence when a question surface was used.
  • ralplan -> ultragoal: require durable planning artifacts, sequential Architect then Critic approvals, and a session/review-cycle-bound ralplan_execution_handoff. For supervised Autopilot, the explicit Autopilot request is the source of that bound handoff. Ordinary progression MUST NOT depend on a host-issued consensus receipt; missing host provenance is not a blocker.
  • ultragoal -> complete: require durable goal/ledger completion receipts and fresh verification evidence matching the requested outcome.
  • review/QA loopback: keep Autopilot active, set current_phase:"ralplan", and persist return_to_ralplan_reason plus the findings.
  • cancellation: run $cancel; preserve handoff artifacts for inspection or resume and mark the exact session terminal without deleting unrelated state.
  • clear/recovery: exact-session clear may remove corrupt or stale Autopilot state. It must not require forward-progression evidence and must not clear other skills or sessions. </State_Management>

<Continuation_And_Resume> When the user says continue, resume, or keep going, read the current session's autopilot-state.json and continue from current_phase:

  • deep-interview: resume clarification and produce the requirements handoff.
  • ralplan: resume consensus planning from the deep-interview artifact and any loopback findings.
  • ultragoal: resume durable execution from the approved plan and ledger.
  • complete: report the terminal evidence; do not restart.
  • cancelled, cleared, or failed: report preserved artifacts and start a new run only on a new explicit Autopilot request.

Never discard valid handoff artifacts or restart discovery merely because the conversation resumed. </Continuation_And_Resume>

<Recovery_Contract> Autopilot continuation hooks may nudge an active non-terminal run, but they MUST fail open for recovery:

  • A stale, malformed, cancelled, cleared, complete, or foreign-session state must not keep Stop blocked.
  • $cancel, exact-session state clear, and setup hook disable/uninstall paths must remain executable while Autopilot is active or damaged.
  • Continuation must be bounded and session-scoped; never recreate an unconditional hook lock. </Recovery_Contract>

<Final_Checklist>

  • A new run started with deep-interview.
  • Deep Interview produced a durable clarified requirements/specification handoff.
  • Ralplan produced an execution-ready plan with lifecycle review evidence.
  • Ultragoal completed the plan with durable goals and ledger receipts.
  • Verification evidence covers the requested behavior, failure paths, and recovery paths.
  • Missing host provenance did not block ordinary progression, cancel, clear, or hook recovery.
  • Autopilot state is terminal and exact-session artifacts remain coherent. </Final_Checklist>
<Examples> <Good> User: `$autopilot implement issue #42` Flow: activate Autopilot at `deep-interview`, crystallize requirements, continue to supervised `ralplan`, then supervised `ultragoal`, verify the completed outcome, and mark the exact session complete. </Good> <Good> User: `continue` Context: Autopilot state has `current_phase:"ralplan"`. Flow: resume the existing plan from the deep-interview handoff; do not create a separate standalone Ralplan run. </Good> <Bad> Flow: treat `$deep-interview`, `$ralplan`, and `$ultragoal` as optional suggestions and jump directly to implementation. Why bad: this hollows out Autopilot's defining orchestration contract. </Bad> </Examples>

Task: {{ARGUMENTS}}

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Clean up working code by identifying duplication, dead code, unnecessary layers, and error paths that hide failures. Preserve behavior with targeted tests, simplify the requested files in stages, and report verification results and remaining risks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Simplify bloated or repetitive AI-generated code
  • Remove unused code and unnecessary wrappers
  • Review fallback paths that hide errors
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex3.4만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

analyze

무료

Investigate repository behavior, architecture, or possible causes without changing files. Trace relevant code and supporting material, then rank explanations by evidence and confidence, with concrete file references and clear distinctions between observations, conclusions, and unresolved questions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Investigate possible causes of a bug
  • Understand behavior across multiple files
  • Explain architecture and tradeoffs
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex3.4만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

ask

무료

Ask Claude or Gemini through a locally installed command-line tool for focused questions, reviews, brainstorming, or second opinions. Save the prompt, original response, summary, and next steps in a reusable Markdown file.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Get a second opinion on a proposed approach
  • Ask Claude or Gemini to review work
  • Save brainstorming results for later use
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex3.4만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Run a persistent research workflow with a defined goal and explicit acceptance checks. It saves progress and finishes only when a recorded result passes either a validation script or an architect review of the research output.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Research with explicit acceptance criteria
  • Verify research results with a script
  • Require review approval before completing research
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex3.4만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Find the replacement for a research command removed in OMX 0.21. This migration notice directs existing autoresearch-goal usage to $autoresearch, the canonical research loop that requires validation before proceeding.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Check the replacement for a removed research command
  • Update requests to use $autoresearch
  • Confirm which command owns the research mission lifecycle
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex3.4만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Research recommended practices for a chosen technology using official documentation and maintainer sources. Get a cited recommendation that explains version context, local project constraints, uncertainties, and the next steps for planning or implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Check official guidance for a chosen technology
  • Research version-specific migration advice
  • Gather evidence before implementation planning
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex3.4만2026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Yeachan-Heo의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고