Designs system architecture and selects technology stack based on vision analysis. Use after vision analysis for technical decisions. Triggers on: design architecture, select tech stack, choose framework.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Builds project visions through interactive guided conversation. Use when users have vague ideas needing structure. Triggers on: build vision, I have an idea, start new project, new idea.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Guide users through an interactive conversation to build a complete, well-structured project vision document.
project.vision.md documentActivate this skill when user says things like:
Start by understanding what kind of project this is.
Question: What type of project is this?
Options:
[A] Web Application (website/app accessed via browser)
[B] CLI Tool (command line tool)
[C] API Service (backend API service)
[D] Desktop Application (Windows/Mac/Linux app)
[E] Mobile Application (iOS/Android)
[F] Library/SDK (code package for other developers)
[G] Other (please describe)
If user selects [G], follow up with open-ended question.
Understand the problem being solved.
Question: What problem does this project solve?
Options:
[A] Improve Efficiency (automation, reduce repetitive work)
[B] Information Management (store, organize, retrieve data)
[C] Communication/Collaboration (help people work together)
[D] Entertainment/Creative (games, media, art)
[E] Learning/Education (teaching, training)
[F] Other (please describe)
Allow multiple selections: true
Follow up: "Can you describe the problem you want to solve in more detail?"
Identify who will use the product.
Question: Who will use this product?
Options:
[A] Developers/Technical Users
[B] General Consumers/Individual Users
[C] Enterprise/Team Users
[D] Specific Industry Professionals
[E] Personal Use Only
[F] Other
Allow multiple selections: true
If [D] selected, ask: "Which industry?"
Understand the scope.
Question: What is the scale and ambition of this project?
Options:
[A] Small Project - Quick idea validation, completed in days
[B] Medium Project - Complete features, completed in weeks
[C] Large Project - Full product, requires months
[D] Uncertain - Help me evaluate
Define what success looks like.
Question: What defines success for this project? (multiple selections allowed)
Options:
[A] Feature complete and usable
[B] Performance meets requirements (speed, stability)
[C] Good user experience
[D] People willing to use/pay
[E] Learn/practice new technologies
[F] Other
Follow up for selected items to get specific metrics.
Gather technical constraints.
Question: Do you have technology stack preferences?
Options:
[A] Clear preferences (please specify)
[B] Some preferences but open to discussion
[C] Let AI decide
[D] Want to try new technologies
If [A] or [B], ask follow-up about specific technologies.
Question: Are there any technologies you want to avoid?
Options:
[A] No, open to all
[B] Avoid overly complex frameworks
[C] Avoid paid/commercial components
[D] Specific technologies to avoid (please specify)
Identify limitations.
Question: Are there any constraints? (multiple selections allowed)
Options:
[A] Limited time
[B] Limited budget/free only
[C] Must work offline
[D] Specific platform requirements
[E] High security/privacy requirements
[F] No special constraints
Get reference points.
Question: Are there similar products for reference?
Options:
[A] Yes, I can name a few
[B] Have a general direction but unsure of specific products
[C] No, this is a completely new idea
[D] Help me find some references
After completing the conversation, generate project.vision.md:
# Project Vision
## What
[One clear sentence synthesized from conversation]
## Why
[Problem statement from Phase 2, refined]
## Target Users
[Users identified in Phase 3, with details]
## Success Criteria
[Measurable criteria from Phase 5]
- [Criterion 1 with metric]
- [Criterion 2 with metric]
- ...
## Constraints
[Constraints from Phase 7]
- [Constraint 1]
- ...
## Technical Preferences
### Preferred
- [Technology/approach user wants]
### To Avoid
- [Technology/approach to avoid]
## Inspirations
[References from Phase 8]
- [Product 1] - [what to learn from it]
- ...
## Non-Goals
[Explicitly out of scope based on conversation]
- [Non-goal 1]
- ...
---
*Vision built interactively on [date]*
*Ready for: Orchestrator → Architecture → Roadmap*
Add follow-up prompts:
Offer to help:
Allow skipping optional sections:
Never skip: What, Why, Target Users, Success Criteria
User: I want to build some kind of expense tracker
AI: Let me help you refine this idea into a complete project vision.
First, what type of project is this? [A] Web App [B] CLI Tool [C] API Service [D] Mobile App [E] Other
User: A
AI: OK, a web expense tracking app. What problem does it solve? [A] Existing expense software is too complex [B] Need specific tracking features [C] Want better data analysis [D] Other
User: A, too complex
AI: Got it, you want a simple expense tracker. Who will use it? [A] Just myself [B] Family members [C] Small team [D] Public facing
User: A
AI: Simple personal expense tracking. What defines success? [A] Can quickly record expenses [B] Can generate monthly reports [C] Can categorize and analyze [D] Can export data (multiple selections allowed)
User: A, B, C
AI: How quick is "quickly record"? [A] Under 5 seconds per entry [B] Under 10 seconds [C] Not sure, just needs to be fast
User: A
...continues until vision is complete...
Before saving vision:
After vision is built:
project.vision.mdYou are a professional product consultant.
Remember: The goal is to help users who "only have fragments in their mind" build a complete, actionable vision through professional guidance.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Designs system architecture and selects technology stack based on vision analysis. Use after vision analysis for technical decisions. Triggers on: design architecture, select tech stack, choose framework.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Reviews and cleans up outdated documentation. Use periodically to maintain documentation health. Triggers on: review docs, clean up documentation, check for stale docs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guides God Committee members through consensus-building for collective decisions. Use for proposals, voting, and disagreement resolution. Triggers on: consensus, voting, proposal, committee decision.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guides God Committee members through executing interventions. Use for repairs, rollbacks, and emergency actions. Triggers on: intervention, repair, rollback, emergency action.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Defines God Committee member behavior and responsibilities with oversight authority. Use when operating as a committee member. Triggers on: god committee, committee observation, council discussion.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Logs AI thoughts and decisions for human observability. Applies continuously throughout all tasks to maintain transparency.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.