본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

bmad-shard-doc

Splits large markdown documents into smaller, organized files based on level 2 (default) sections. Use if the user says perform shard document

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Shard Document

Goal: Split large markdown documents into smaller, organized files based on level 2 sections using npx @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser.

CRITICAL RULES

  • MANDATORY: Execute ALL steps in the EXECUTION section IN EXACT ORDER
  • DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence
  • HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met
  • Each action within a step is a REQUIRED action to complete that step

EXECUTION

Step 1: Get Source Document

  • Ask user for the source document path if not provided already
  • Verify file exists and is accessible
  • Verify file is markdown format (.md extension)
  • If file not found or not markdown: HALT with error message

Step 2: Get Destination Folder

  • Determine default destination: same location as source file, folder named after source file without .md extension
    • Example: /path/to/architecture.md --> /path/to/architecture/
  • Ask user for the destination folder path ([y] to confirm use of default: [suggested-path], else enter a new path)
  • If user accepts default: use the suggested destination path
  • If user provides custom path: use the custom destination path
  • Verify destination folder exists or can be created
  • Check write permissions for destination
  • If permission denied: HALT with error message

Step 3: Execute Sharding

  • Inform user that sharding is beginning
  • Execute command: npx @kayvan/markdown-tree-parser explode [source-document] [destination-folder]
  • Capture command output and any errors
  • If command fails: HALT and display error to user

Step 4: Verify Output

  • Check that destination folder contains sharded files
  • Verify index.md was created in destination folder
  • Count the number of files created
  • If no files created: HALT with error message

Step 5: Report Completion

  • Display completion report to user including:
    • Source document path and name
    • Destination folder path
    • Number of section files created
    • Confirmation that index.md was created
    • Any tool output or warnings
  • Inform user that sharding completed successfully

Step 6: Handle Original Document

Critical: Keeping both the original and sharded versions defeats the purpose of sharding and can cause confusion.

Present user with options for the original document:

What would you like to do with the original document [source-document-name]?

Options:

  • [d] Delete - Remove the original (recommended - shards can always be recombined)
  • [m] Move to archive - Move original to a backup/archive location
  • [k] Keep - Leave original in place (NOT recommended - defeats sharding purpose)

Your choice (d/m/k):

If user selects d (delete)

  • Delete the original source document file
  • Confirm deletion to user: "Original document deleted: [source-document-path]"
  • Note: The document can be reconstructed from shards by concatenating all section files in order

If user selects m (move)

  • Determine default archive location: same directory as source, in an archive subfolder
    • Example: /path/to/architecture.md --> /path/to/archive/architecture.md
  • Ask: Archive location ([y] to use default: [default-archive-path], or provide custom path)
  • If user accepts default: use default archive path
  • If user provides custom path: use custom archive path
  • Create archive directory if it does not exist
  • Move original document to archive location
  • Confirm move to user: "Original document moved to: [archive-path]"

If user selects k (keep)

  • Display warning to user:
    • Keeping both original and sharded versions is NOT recommended
    • The discover_inputs protocol may load the wrong version
    • Updates to one will not reflect in the other
    • Duplicate content taking up space
    • Consider deleting or archiving the original document
  • Confirm user choice: "Original document kept at: [source-document-path]"

HALT CONDITIONS

  • HALT if npx command fails or produces no output files

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

adapt

무료

Adapt designs to work across different screen sizes, devices, contexts, or platforms. Implements breakpoints, fluid layouts, and touch targets. Use when the user mentions responsive design, mobile layouts, breakpoints, viewport adaptation, or cross-device compatibility.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

youranreus/note122026년 8월 6일 업데이트

animate

무료

Review a feature and enhance it with purposeful animations, micro-interactions, and motion effects that improve usability and delight. Use when the user mentions adding animation, transitions, micro-interactions, motion design, hover effects, or making the UI feel more alive.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

youranreus/note122026년 8월 6일 업데이트

arrange

무료

Improve layout, spacing, and visual rhythm. Fixes monotonous grids, inconsistent spacing, and weak visual hierarchy. Use when the user mentions layout feeling off, spacing issues, visual hierarchy, crowded UI, alignment problems, or wanting better composition.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

youranreus/note122026년 8월 6일 업데이트

ask-matt

무료

Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

youranreus/note122026년 8월 6일 업데이트

audit

무료

Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

youranreus/note122026년 8월 6일 업데이트

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

youranreus/note122026년 8월 6일 업데이트

youranreus의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고