본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

http-load-profiler

Run stepped HTTP load tests with ab/wrk, ramping concurrency levels to collect p50/p90/p99 latency, detect performance inflection points, and recommend optimal concurrency. Triggered by requests like 'load test this URL', 'benchmark my API', 'find the max concurrency', or mentions of p99 latency, throughput saturation, or capacity planning.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(3)

  • SKILL.md6.1 KB
  • LICENSE1.0 KB
  • scripts/http_benchmark.py14.3 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

HTTP Load Profiler — Stepped Concurrency Load Test + Inflection Point Analysis

Run stepped concurrency load tests against HTTP services, automatically collect latency percentiles, and detect performance inflection points.

Features

  • Dual engine support: Auto-detects wrk (preferred) or ab (Apache Bench); manual override available
  • Stepped concurrency: Ramps up through user-defined concurrency levels (default: 1 → 10 → 50 → 100 → 200 → 500)
  • Latency percentiles: Collects p50 / p90 / p99 latency at each level
  • Inflection point detection: Automatically identifies four types of performance inflection points
    • p99 latency accelerating (increase exceeds 2x the previous step's increase)
    • Throughput efficiency dropping significantly (RPS per connection drops > 40%)
    • Throughput saturated while latency spikes (RPS growth < 10%, p99 growth > 50%)
    • Error rate surging (exceeds 1% and doubles from previous step)
  • Optimal concurrency recommendation: Automatically suggests the best concurrency level based on inflection points
  • Zero Python dependencies: Pure standard library implementation

Quick Start

# Basic usage — run default stepped load test against target URL
python3 scripts/http_benchmark.py https://example.com/api/health

# Custom concurrency steps and duration per step
python3 scripts/http_benchmark.py https://example.com/api/health -s 5,20,50,100,300 -d 15

# Specify ab as the engine
python3 scripts/http_benchmark.py https://example.com/ -t ab

# JSON-only output (for programmatic parsing)
python3 scripts/http_benchmark.py https://example.com/api/health --json

# Use ab with a specific number of requests per step
python3 scripts/http_benchmark.py https://example.com/ -t ab -n 5000

# Save JSON report to a file
python3 scripts/http_benchmark.py https://example.com/api/health --json > report.json

Parameters

ParameterShortDefaultDescription
url—(required)Target URL (http:// or https://)
--steps-s1,10,50,100,200,500Concurrency steps (comma-separated positive integers)
--duration-d10Duration per step in seconds (used directly by wrk; ab estimates request count from this)
--requests-nconcurrency×100Total requests per step when using ab
--tool-tauto-detectSpecify load testing tool: wrk or ab
--threads—min(concurrency, CPU cores)Thread count for wrk
--json—falseOutput JSON only

Output Format

Human-readable (default)

Tool: wrk
Target URL: https://example.com/api/health
Concurrency steps: [1, 10, 50, 100, 200, 500]
Duration per step: 10s

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Conc. |        RPS |  Avg(ms) |  P50(ms) |  P90(ms) |  P99(ms) |   Errors | Inflection
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     1 |      245.3 |      4.1 |      3.8 |      5.2 |      8.1 |   0.00% |
    10 |     2301.5 |      4.3 |      4.0 |      5.8 |      9.3 |   0.00% |
    50 |     9876.2 |      5.1 |      4.6 |      7.2 |     12.5 |   0.00% |
   100 |    14523.1 |      6.9 |      5.8 |     10.3 |     22.7 |   0.00% |
   200 |    15102.3 |     13.2 |     10.1 |     22.5 |     58.3 |   0.12% |  ◀
   500 |    14890.5 |     33.6 |     28.3 |     55.2 |    132.1 |   1.35% |  ◀
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Inflection point analysis:
  ▶ Concurrency 200:
    - p99 latency accelerating: 22.7ms → 58.3ms (increase 35.6ms, previous step increase 10.2ms)
    - Throughput saturated with latency spike: RPS grew only 3.9% while p99 latency grew 156.8%
  ▶ Concurrency 500:
    - Error rate surging: 0.12% → 1.35%

Recommended optimal concurrency: 100

JSON format (--json)

{
  "url": "https://example.com/api/health",
  "tool": "wrk",
  "duration_per_step": 10,
  "steps": [
    {
      "concurrency": 1,
      "rps": 245.3,
      "avg_latency_ms": 4.1,
      "p50_ms": 3.8,
      "p90_ms": 5.2,
      "p99_ms": 8.1,
      "total_requests": 2453,
      "errors": 0
    }
  ],
  "inflection_points": [
    {
      "concurrency": 200,
      "step_index": 4,
      "reasons": ["p99 latency accelerating: ..."]
    }
  ],
  "recommended_concurrency": 100
}

Prerequisites

At least one of wrk or ab must be installed:

# Ubuntu / Debian
sudo apt-get install wrk          # recommended
sudo apt-get install apache2-utils # ab

# macOS
brew install wrk
# ab is pre-installed on macOS

Inflection Point Detection Algorithm

For each concurrency level, the following metrics are compared against the two preceding levels:

  1. p99 latency acceleration: Triggers when the current p99 increase exceeds 2x the previous step's increase
  2. Throughput efficiency: Triggers when RPS per connection drops > 40% from the previous step
  3. Saturation detection: Triggers when RPS growth < 10% while p99 growth > 50%
  4. Error rate: Triggers when rate exceeds 1% and doubles from the previous step

Recommended optimal concurrency: The concurrency level one step before the first inflection point. If no inflection point is found, the level with the highest RPS is selected.

Important Notes

  • Load testing generates real traffic against the target service — do not run against production services without authorization
  • wrk provides more accurate latency percentiles than ab (wrk uses HdrHistogram)
  • ab does not support a duration parameter; the script approximates timing via total request count
  • A minimum of 10 seconds per step is recommended for stable results

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Simulates academic peer review, evaluating papers across Originality, Methodology, Results, and Writing to provide Major/Minor Revision recommendations with actionable feedback. Triggers when a user asks to "review my paper," "simulate peer review," or "give my paper a peer review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

zebbern/claude-code-guide4.7천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

This skill should be used when the user asks to "attack Active Directory", "exploit AD", "Kerberoasting", "DCSync", "pass-the-hash", "BloodHound enumeration", "Golden Ticket", "Silver Ticket", "AS-REP roasting", "NTLM relay", or needs guidance on Windows domain penetration testing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

zebbern/claude-code-guide4.7천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

This skill should be used when the user asks to "test API security", "fuzz APIs", "find IDOR vulnerabilities", "test REST API", "test GraphQL", "API penetration testing", "bug bounty API testing", or needs guidance on API security assessment techniques.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

zebbern/claude-code-guide4.7천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Generate multiple radically different interface designs for a module using parallel sub-agents. Use when user wants to design an API, explore interface options, compare module shapes, or mentions "design it twice".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

zebbern/claude-code-guide4.7천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Interactive system flow tracing across CODE, API, AUTH, DATA, NETWORK layers with SQLite persistence and Mermaid export. Use for security audits, compliance documentation, flow tracing, feature ideation, brainstorming, debugging, architecture reviews, or incident post-mortems. Triggers on audit, trace flow, document flow, security review, debug flow, brainstorm, architecture review, post-mortem, incident review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

zebbern/claude-code-guide4.7천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

Authentication patterns: session vs JWT vs OAuth comparison, provider selection (NextAuth, Clerk, Supabase Auth), security checklist, and common mistakes. Use when implementing auth, reviewing auth flows, or choosing auth providers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

zebbern/claude-code-guide4.7천2026년 10월 19일 업데이트

zebbern의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고