スキルを探す

Cite-or-Block 架构下的药名 cross-check 原子 skill。给定报告文本与 .cache/<slug>/sources/,扫描每个药品提及 → 找最近 citation 锚点 → 核对锚点指向的源里是否真的提到了此药(通用名 + 商品名)。无字典、无 fallback、源里没 = critical。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 4 Turn 1 of disease-market-sizing-orchestration. Generates report HTML with mandatory citation anchors per fact claim. Reads contract + staging + sources/. Every drug/treatment/stat/recommendation MUST carry [pmid:.../guideline:.../nct:...] anchor that resolves to an actual file in sources/. NEVER hardcode drug names or numerical claims. Use AFTER evidence recall (phase 3), BEFORE content-verification-layer (Turn 2).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. Searches the web, synthesizes findings, and delivers cited reports with source attribution. Use when the user wants thorough research on any topic with evidence and citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-grounded AI research workflow for turning supplied economics, finance, management, and social-science papers or structured records into versioned PaperReading artifacts. Use when Codex must ingest text, Markdown, or a text-based PDF; separate source-grounded claims from researcher analysis; bind findings to evidence IDs and locators; review extraction candidates; migrate v0.2 PaperRecord JSON; validate or verify a v0.3 PaperPackage; generate research extensions; export reviewable JSON or Markdown; or safely update a compatible 13-field literature workbook.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when [trigger symptoms, user intents, task contexts]. Include Chinese trigger phrases when useful. Do not summarize workflow here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze, design, write, revise, translate, and review empirical or technical research papers through an evidence-bounded dialectical workflow. Use when Codex must develop a research question, integrate reference papers with a user's ideas, build phenomenon-mechanism-conditions reasoning, design methods or experiments, restructure or edit a manuscript, translate Chinese academic text into restrained English, answer reviewers, or run multi-round peer-review convergence without fabricating evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brand mention and authority scanner for AI visibility. Analyzes brand presence across platforms that AI models rely on for entity recognition and citation decisions. Produces a Brand Authority Score (0-100) with platform-specific recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

从对标账号导入 script + 数据 → 拆 pattern + 派生 base rubric 信号 → 写到 benchmark.md / script_patterns.md / rubric_notes.md。**这是工具最早期信号的来源**——cold-start 用户没自己历史时全靠对标，发过历史的用户也建议至少 1 个对标做 sanity check。触发词："学这个账号"/"拆这几个对标视频"/"learn from"/"导入对标账号"/"找对标"。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read and analyze Xiaohongshu comments from the user's signed-in Chrome session. Use to collect, export, summarize, or classify comments for content planning, follow-up posts, audience research, reply strategy, and 引流文案。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GStack learn method for capturing reusable lessons, triggers, and future retrieval cues after debugging, implementation, or release work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When a bug or regression is reported, the FIRST step — before fixing — is to research how and when it was introduced (git archaeology), then record that finding on the tracking issue/PR. Use the moment a bug, error, broken build, or "this used to work" is reported, before writing a fix. Produces a first-bad-commit (or "not a code regression") note you paste onto the issue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drives the Phase 4-5 dev pipeline state machine with sub-agent reviews and bounded autoresearch gates. Use when running /pipeline or executing an approved plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-PRD Research methodology combining Business Analysis, Creative Problem-Solving, Brainstorming, and Innovation Strategy. Use before writing any PRD for problem validation, market research, competitive analysis, stakeholder interviews, ideation, root cause analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AID Memory System for session feedback, learning cycles, and skill improvement. Manages state, feedback collection, and improvement analysis. Load for /aid-init, /aid-start, /aid-status, /aid-end, /aid-improve, /aid-memory, /aid-reset.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bounded improvement loop: one artifact, fixed eval score, keep an edit only if strictly better. Use for AR_DESIGN/AR_FUNCTION/AR_ACCEPTANCE stages or standalone bounded iteration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AID Phase 0 - Research & discovery. Use for validating problem spaces, identifying stakeholders, defining success metrics, deciding whether to proceed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision transparency, feedback collection, and debate invitations for AID methodology. Active in ALL phases for ALL roles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, revise, and validate publication-ready academic paper figures and tables. Use for LaTeX tables, related-work comparison tables, result tables, notation/dataset/taxonomy tables, precise source-data-driven experiment plots from CSV/JSON/logs, generated conceptual figures such as system overviews/pipelines/architectures/threat models, captions, artifact specs, source-data traceability, and paper-ready PDF/SVG/PNG/LaTeX exports. Do not use for prose-only paper writing, self-review, reviewer response, rebuttal drafting, or external literature-management workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft and revise evidence-grounded academic manuscripts with adaptable author preferences. Use for section writing, implementing structural edits, claim calibration, citation-integrated prose, prose cleanup, standalone review excerpts, and LaTeX template migration. Use paper-review for critique or author responses, and paper-figures-tables for final visual artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review an author's manuscript, its argument and paragraph structure, analyze reviewer comments, draft rebuttals, and verify revisions. Use for self-review, structural edit plans, simulated reviewer objections, author responses, revision closure, and submission-readiness assessment. Formal assigned peer review is outside this skill; manuscript edits and final figures/tables use their owning skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve, validate, and audit manuscript integrity and applicable requirements for academic manuscripts and paper artifacts. Use when Codex needs to determine active paper rules from manuscript state, paper type, venue, submission stage, or workflow mode; lint a LaTeX paper project; assess submission readiness; create or update a paper policy profile; explain why a rule is active; or validate the paper-policy registries. Do not use as the primary skill for prose drafting, peer review, rebuttal writing, citation discovery, or figure/table creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a learner's technical level is unknown or uncertain, requiring diagnostic calibration before teaching begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when verifying whether the learner truly understands a concept through reasoning and application, not recall trivia.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when generating personalized practice challenges calibrated to the learner's weak areas, level, and project context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。