スキルを探す

Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create safety-bounded draft structures and run local deterministic checks for clinical case, diagnostic, trial, safety, and aggregate research reports. Use only with synthetic, de-identified, or aggregate inputs and verified source-fact manifests; every output requires qualified review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

理解化学科研自然语言需求，生成带来源绑定的 ResearchIntent，并通过本地确定性校验路由到七个化学 Skill、受控 Skill 链或 Workflow A/B。用于复杂、多步、模糊、需要自动编排，或可能联网、产生费用和发送数据的化学身份、结构、特征、分子库、反应和已有路线任务；毒性预测、路线生成、实验安全和放大审批不支持。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query Google NotebookLM notebooks for source-grounded, citation-backed answers from user-uploaded documents. Manages notebook library, handles Google authentication, and supports smart discovery. Works standalone via /blog notebooklm or internally from blog-write and blog-researcher for source-grounded research context. Falls back gracefully when not configured. Use when user says "notebooklm", "notebook", "query notebook", "ask notebook", "notebook research", "source grounded research", "document query", "notebook library".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query a user's Gemini Notebook (formerly NotebookLM) for source-grounded answers through a logged-in browser session on their Google account. Uses the account's usage limits and writes browser state. Runs only on an explicit request: /blog notebooklm, "ask my Gemini Notebook", "ask my NotebookLM notebook", or "query my notebook library". Also used by blog-write when the user named a notebook for research. Not for generic research or note-taking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold and operate Claude Blog Brain, a source-cited Obsidian brain for blog content creation, optimization, and management dual-optimized for Google rankings (E-E-A-T, the 2026 core updates) and AI citations (GEO/AEO), spanning writing, rewriting and freshness, SERP-informed briefs and outlines, editorial calendars and strategy, semantic topic clusters, schema and internal linking, multilingual publishing, the FLOW framework, factchecking, personas, distribution, and the blog delivery contract, grounded in the claude-blog skill. Use when the user says "claude-blog-brain", "Claude Blog Brain", "create a blog content creation, optimization, and management dual-optimized for Google rankings (E-E-A-T, the 2026 core updates) and AI citations (GEO/AEO), spanning writing, rewriting and freshness, SERP-informed briefs and outlines, editorial calendars and strategy, semantic topic clusters, schema and internal linking, multilingual publishing, the FLOW framework, factchecking, personas, distribution, and the blog delivery contract, grounded in the claude-blog skill brain", "import sources", "synthesize plan", "render report", or wants a persistent vault-backed operating system for blog content creation, optimization, and management dual-optimized for Google rankings (E-E-A-T, the 2026 core updates) and AI citations (GEO/AEO), spanning writing, rewriting and freshness, SERP-informed briefs and outlines, editorial calendars and strategy, semantic topic clusters, schema and internal linking, multilingual publishing, the FLOW framework, factchecking, personas, distribution, and the blog delivery contract, grounded in the claude-blog skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

向现有调研outline补充items（调研对象）。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read research outline, launch independent agent for each item for deep research. Disable task output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

向现有调研outline补充字段定义。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

对目标话题进行初步调研，生成调研outline。用于学术调研、benchmark调研、技术选型等场景。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct preliminary research on a topic and generate research outline. For academic research, benchmark research, technology selection, etc.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

将deep调研结果汇总为markdown报告，覆盖所有字段，跳过不确定值。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

读取调研outline，为每个item启动独立agent进行深度调研。禁用task output。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add items (research objects) to existing research outline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add field definitions to existing research outline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize deep research results into markdown report, cover all fields, skip uncertain values.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discuss a domain with the user, research it from real sources, then generate a trusted skill bundle for it - a step-by-step workflow with a flowchart, a domain adapter, a trap fixture, and a smoke eval. Use when the user says "/fable-domain SECTOR", "make a skill for DOMAIN", "add a domain to the fable method", or "give a lesser model Fable's workflow for DOMAIN". The bundle is the deliverable; a workflow without its flowchart, sources, and trap is not done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workshop coach for the Research Desk (SEC agents) workshop. Use when the user types /workshop, asks for a workshop act or module ("act 2", "next act", "where am I"), wants a TODO(workshop-N) implemented or explained, or asks for help following WORKSHOP.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks about Ni Haisha / 倪海厦 TCM course material, especially Shang Han Lun / 伤寒论, Jingui / 金匮要略, Zhongjing Xinfa / 仲景心法, clinical cases / 临床案例 / 倪师医案, Bagang Bianzheng / 八纲辨证, Fuyang Forum / 扶阳论坛, Yijinjing / 易筋经, Liang Dong dialogue / 梁冬对话倪师, Stanford lecture / 斯坦福大学演讲, Tianji / 天纪 / 易经 / 阳宅 / 紫微斗数, Huangdi Neijing / 黄帝内经, Shennong Bencao / 神农本草, acupuncture / 针灸, meridians, acupoints, acupuncture depth safety / 危险进针深度 / 气胸风险, six-channel pattern identification, symptom-to-formula routing, formula comparison, lesson review, board/PPT screenshot evidence, or course-derived study notes. This skill is for educational distillation and study support only, not medical diagnosis, prescriptions, dosage, individualized treatment, or self-administered acupuncture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and funding proposals (NSF Project Summary/Description, NIH Specific Aims): preserve scholarly conventions, match claims to evidence (and, for proposals, claims to feasibility), and match the author's own voice. It never changes a number, result, or citation, and it is not for evading AI-use disclosure. Use when editing AI-assisted academic prose or grant proposals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standards and audits for writing academic papers, especially ML/NLP submissions to NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, EMNLP, NAACL. Covers the author's house prose rules (zero em dashes, zero fluff, every sentence earns its place), verification of hallucinated claims and hallucinated or malformed bibliography entries, the ACL policy on AI writing assistance and what must be disclosed, and best practices for paper structure, experiments, reproducibility checklists, and rebuttals. Use this skill whenever the user is drafting, editing, polishing, restructuring, or reviewing a paper, abstract, intro, related work, rebuttal, or camera-ready; whenever they ask to "clean up" or "tighten" academic writing; whenever citations or a .bib file need checking; and whenever they ask what has to be disclosed about AI assistance. Reach for it even when the user only says "make this section better", "check my references", or "is this ready to submit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build MCP servers using the Leanmcp SDK with decorator-based TypeScript. Use this skill when users ask for "leanmcp", "MCP with decorators", "MCP with authentication", "MCP with elicitation", "MCP with environment injection", or want a simpler, more elegant way to build MCP servers. Leanmcp provides automatic schema generation, dependency injection, authentication, and user input collection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Judges whether material for children under six is developmentally plausible — what is typical at each age, why pre-K is not a thinner kindergarten, and which frameworks apply where Common Core does not. Use this to design or review pre-K material, decide whether a task is reasonable for an age, choose the right framework for a pre-K alignment claim, or push back on material that pushes school-age expectations downward.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aligns learning material to the standard it claims — choosing the right framework for the grade and subject, citing standards by code rather than reproducing their text, and telling a real alignment from a decorative one. Use this to align a worksheet, lesson or workbook to Common Core, NGSS or a state framework, to check an alignment claim before publishing, or to decide what may lawfully be printed on the cover.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。