4,135 件 ・ 人気順
概要と使いどころ
Checks consistency across title, abstract, methods, results, figures, tables, and supplements to identify internal contradictions and version drift in biomedical manuscripts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Matches your study to appropriate journals based on topic, design, and evidence strength. Use when deciding where to submit a manuscript, comparing journal options by impact factor vs scope fit vs method tolerance, or finding a realistic submission target after a rejection. Also triggers on "where should I submit this paper", "which journal is best for my study", "find journals for my manuscript", "is this a good fit for [journal]", or "I need a journal with IF around X".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds prioritized manuscript revision plans for major or minor revisions by separating comments that require experiments, analyses, clarification, restructuring, or wording changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Converts biomedical table content into clear manuscript or presentation narrative by prioritizing meaningful patterns, contrasts, and interpretation boundaries rather than restating every number.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Checks biomedical manuscripts against reporting guidelines such as CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, and TRIPOD to identify missing or weak reporting elements before submission or revision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts journal-ready cover letters for manuscript submission. Use when preparing a submission package, communicating the manuscript's contributions and journal fit to editors, or tailoring the novelty framing for a specific journal's scope. Also triggers on "write a cover letter for my paper", "draft a submission cover letter", "help me write to the editor", or "cover letter for [journal name]".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns reviewer comments into structured, professional point-by-point responses linked to manuscript revisions, clarifications, rebuttals, and additional analyses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calibrates manuscript claim strength so wording matches the actual evidence level, study design, and validation status.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds background-gap-objective logic for biomedical manuscript introductions with clear study positioning and disciplined narrative structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rewrites technical research content into a structured lay summary that cross-disciplinary teams can quickly understand and act on. Use when the user wants to explain research to colleagues outside their specialty — clinicians, wet-lab scientists, bioinformaticians, product managers, or leadership. Trigger on: "lay summary", "explain my research to the team", "non-technical summary", "cross-disciplinary summary", "translate my findings", "align our team on the study", or any request to communicate research goals, findings, or next steps to a mixed or non-specialist audience. Part of the AIPOCH Academic Writing skill hub. Sits midstream: after research content is clarified, before downstream deliverables like slide decks or graphical abstracts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes the full Results section of a biomedical manuscript from a sufficiently clear result structure, figure inventory, or analysis summary while preserving evidence boundaries and result hierarchy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Converts existing manuscript content into LaTeX format aligned with a target journal, conference, or template while preserving manuscript meaning and structural integrity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimizes manuscript titles and abstracts for information density, factual accuracy, and submission fit in biomedical research writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Condenses a full study into conference-submission abstract format. Use when adapting a manuscript abstract or study summary to meet a specific conference's word limit, structured format (Background/Methods/Results/Conclusion), character limits, or required section headings. Also triggers on "adapt my abstract for [conference]", "shorten my abstract to 250 words", "reformat for ASCO/ASGCT/SfN/AACR", "I need a conference abstract", or "cut my abstract to fit the word limit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scrum-inspired paper review, revision, and R&R workflow. Handles docx/tex/md/PDF in English or Chinese. Auto-detects manuscript stage, estimates sprint count, runs multi-lens review (Contribution/Rigor/Writing/Editor), generates prioritized revision backlog, exports MD/DOCX/PDF/HTML reports. Use when asked to review a paper, revise based on reviewer comments, handle R&R, respond to peer review, plan paper revision sprints, or when user types /ps or /papersprint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Converts a biomedical study storyline into a graphical abstract and, when direct image capability is available, generates the graphical abstract directly; otherwise it falls back to prompts, Mermaid flowcharts, or designer-facing briefs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns your protocol and analysis workflow into publication-ready Methods text. Use when writing or revising the Methods section of a biomedical manuscript, ensuring it complies with reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, TRIPOD), matches what is in the Results section, and satisfies journal-specific word limits and declarations. Also triggers on "write my methods", "revise my methods section", "how to report my statistics", "what do I need to include in methods for [study type]", or "make my methods CONSORT-compliant".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Checks whether manuscript references are accurately matched to claims, appropriately scoped, and not overextended, misquoted, or second-hand cited.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes Specific Aims pages for grant applications. Use when drafting or revising the Specific Aims page (NIH R01/R21/R03), NSF Project Summary, or equivalent for any major funding agency. Also triggers on "write my specific aims", "help me draft specific aims for NIH", "what should a specific aims page include", "NSF project summary", "write my grant aims", or "how do I structure an R01".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Composes a Discussion around key findings, mechanisms, clinical relevance, and limitations. Use when writing or improving a Discussion section for any biomedical manuscript — including interpreting results, connecting to prior literature, addressing unexpected findings, framing limitations, and writing the conclusion. Also triggers on "write my discussion", "help me discuss my findings", "how do I compare to prior studies", "write the limitations paragraph", or "draft a discussion for my paper".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a submission-readiness preflight on a manuscript before arXiv upload. Use when the user is preparing an arXiv submission, asks to check a paper before uploading, mentions hallucinated or fake references, leftover LLM meta-comments / prompts in text, placeholder data (TODO, TBD, XX%), AI-use disclosure, scholarly integrity, research integrity, or arXiv moderation risk — even if they don't say "preflight". Also trigger on phrases like "check my paper before arXiv", "verify my references", "scan for AI artifacts", "scan for LLM residue", "is my submission ready", or "review .tex/.bib before submit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improves medical English precision without changing the underlying facts, evidence boundaries, or intended scientific meaning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Acknowledges limitations in sample, design, measurement, and validation in a professional way that improves credibility without undermining the whole paper. Use when writing the limitations paragraph of a Discussion section, preparing a grant risk assessment, responding to reviewers about study weaknesses, or framing scope boundaries for a paper. Also triggers on "write my limitations", "how should I address the limitation of", "reviewer said my sample is too small", or "help me word this limitation".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes the full Introduction section of a biomedical manuscript based on an approved or sufficiently clear study logic, while preserving evidence boundaries and introduction discipline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。