スキルを探す

Teach any topic deeply from first principles and build evidence-based paths toward exceptional capability. Use when a user asks to understand, explain, learn, or deep-dive into a topic; asks why or how something works, why it matters, how alternatives compare, or what different perspectives reveal; requests current paradigms, a complete roadmap or curriculum, deliberate practice and feedback, or a top-1%-level mastery plan. Answer explanation questions completely before offering a curriculum; route explicit mastery goals to an adaptive practice and proof-of-capability system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Profile and debug Hermes sessions from their JSONL transcripts. Find a session and its subagents, build a queryable event table, summarize the work as a hierarchical table of contents, break down wall time, inference, tools, tokens, and estimated cost per agent, identify errors and improvement opportunities, and export a shareable Perfetto trace. Use when a user wants to inspect what a Hermes session did, debug agent or subagent activity, understand session cost or latency, create a session timeline, generate a trace, or learn how to improve the next agent run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform saved links, papers, articles, posts, videos, and reference collections into approachable AI teaching artifacts for later study. Use when a user wants to queue learning material, create a readable explanation from a source, teach a paper or post step by step, or run an interactive tutor that validates understanding over multiple sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove AI-generated writing patterns from rebuttal prose to make it sound natural, direct, and authentically human-authored. Use when a Stage 2 refined draft or Stage 4 follow-up response reads too formulaic, robotic, or "GPT-like". Supports academic English.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verification guide for citations added during rebuttal writing. Use when Stage 2 responses introduce new references, when the Area Chair asks about a cited paper, or when any citation in the rebuttal might have been AI-generated. Prevents the serious credibility damage of fabricated references in reviewer-facing documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize extracted paper text into concise Markdown memory for later Stage 2 and Stage 4 background use, with fixed section headings and no fabricated claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct in-depth, multi-step research on a given topic by decomposing queries, finding diverse sources, cross-referencing findings, and synthesizing a comprehensive report. Use when the user requests deep research or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize text using extractive, abstractive, hierarchical, and multi-document techniques, producing concise outputs at configurable detail levels. Use when the user requests summarization or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build structured knowledge graphs from unstructured text by extracting entities, mapping relationships, generating graph triples, and visualizing the result. Use when the user requests knowledge graph creation or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify the accuracy of claims and statements by extracting individual assertions, identifying authoritative sources, cross-referencing evidence, and assigning confidence-scored verdicts. Use when the user requests fact checking or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a structured literature review on a given topic by defining a search strategy, applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracting key findings, and synthesizing results into a coherent academic review. Use when the user requests literature review or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Learn reusable 2D motion-generation knowledge from user-specified action resources with `/img2mo-learn <resource>`. Use when the user provides videos, extracted frame sequences, spritesheets, Spine assets, generated outputs, failed attempts, or reference motion folders and wants to summarize animation timing, pose beats, style traits, prompt patterns, extraction/cropping rules, or failure lessons into the project `img2mo-knowledge/` folder for later `/img2motion` generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Machine Learning Engineer. Use when a task calls for Machine Learning Engineer judgment. Reasons from decision-policy framing, Google's Rules of ML, point-in-time data, and prefill/decode inference physics through GBDT/PyTorch baselines, vLLM/SGLang/KServe serving with FP8/AWQ quantization, hybrid-retrieval RAG, RAGAS and human-validated LLM judges, OpenTelemetry GenAI tracing, and post-Omnibus EU AI Act obligations while treating train-serve skew, temporal leakage, prompt injection, LLM nondeterminism, and degenerate feedback loops as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Machine Learning Researcher. Use when a task calls for Machine Learning Researcher judgment. Reasons from population risk, double descent, and inductive bias; enforces sacred test sets, hierarchical ablations, nested CV, and HELM/Dynabench-aware benchmarking; reports with NeurIPS and Pineau reproducibility checklists while treating leakage, meta-overfitting, benchmark contamination, Goodhart gaming, and seed variance as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Human–Computer Interaction Researcher. Use when a task calls for Human–Computer Interaction Researcher judgment. Reasons from situated context, Fitts/GOMS/KLM, and CHI contribution types; runs contextual inquiry through LMM/CLMM analysis with SUS/NASA-TLX triangulation; uses Prolific/OSF and treats demand characteristics, novelty effects, ordinal misuse, and WEIRD samples as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Global Health Researcher. Use when a task calls for Global Health Researcher judgment. Reasons from burden, equity, and health-system building blocks through DHS/MICS/DHIS2/GBD triangulation, cluster and stepped-wedge designs, RE-AIM/CFIR implementation science, and CIOMS-fair partnership while treating survey weights, HMIS completeness, and GBD smoothing as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Ethologist. Use when a task calls for Ethologist judgment. Reasons from Tinbergen's four questions and versioned species vs experimental ethograms; scores with BORIS (Cohen's κ per behavior), Altmann focal/scan budgets, and ARRIVE 2.0/study-plan lab reporting while treating observer expectation, field–lab arena mismatch, habituation, and pseudoreplication as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Formal Methods Researcher. Use when a task calls for Formal Methods Researcher judgment. Reasons from operational semantics and temporal logics through SPIN/TLA+/PRISM, Coq/Lean/Isabelle, Z3/CVC5, refinement and separation logic, vacuity and false-positive diagnosis, and Dafny/F* versus property-based testing boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Emergency Medicine Researcher. Use when a task calls for Emergency Medicine Researcher judgment. ED trial design expert for pragmatic and cluster RCTs, time-zero and immortal-time bias in acute cohorts, NIHSS/SOFA/qSOFA and ESI/CTAS triage, NEDS/NHAMCS registries, and CONSORT/SPIRIT reporting with Hawthorne and selection-bias failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Environmental Policy Analyst. Use when a task calls for Environmental Policy Analyst judgment. Reasons from statutory authority, baseline definition, and monetization boundaries through NEPA/ESA compliance, Circular A-4 RIAs, EPA SC-GHG and benefit transfer, IAM/IPCC scenario use, and APA regulatory comment while treating discount-rate dominance, weak transfer extrapolation, IAM structural uncertainty, and baseline inflation as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Database Systems Researcher. Use when a task calls for Database Systems Researcher judgment. Reasons from storage hierarchy, concurrency semantics, query-optimization theory, and declared workload models through TPC-C/H, YCSB, and JOB benchmarks, Jepsen/Elle correctness checkers, and perf/blktrace/fio profiling while treating cardinality-estimation plan regressions, tail-latency spikes under skew, unfair fsync-disabled speedups, and benchmark-trick wins as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Deep Learning Scientist. Use when a task calls for Deep Learning Scientist judgment. Reasons from CNN/Transformer inductive bias, Li et al. loss landscapes, grokking/mode connectivity, and Kaplan/Chinchilla scaling (~20 tokens/param); designs ResNet/ViT/DiT/MoE/FlashAttention stacks with FLOPs-matched ablations; trains AdamW+cosine/WSD via Megatron-FSDP/DeepSpeed; evaluates FID/MMLU-Pro/MMLU-CF with lm-eval decontamination and Pineau/NeurIPS reproducibility checklists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Critical Care Researcher. Use when a task calls for Critical Care Researcher judgment. Reasons from acute physiology trajectories, modular organ dysfunction, and cluster-aware trial design through APACHE/SAPS/SOFA scoring, Berlin/Sepsis-3/KDIGO definitions, MIMIC-IV phenotyping, and target-trial emulation with clone-censor-weighting while treating immortal-time bias, cluster contamination, competing risks from early death, and sepsis-phenotype cohort inflation as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Computer Graphics Researcher. Use when a task calls for Computer Graphics Researcher judgment. Reasons from the rendering equation, Monte Carlo bias/variance, sampling theory, and BSDF energy conservation through pbrt-v4/Mitsuba 3 references, MIS/ReSTIR/path guiding, DXR 1.2 real-time stacks, 3DGS and NerfBaselines protocols, FLIP/ColorVideoVDP evaluation, OpenUSD/MaterialX/OpenPBR interchange, and ACES 2/OCIO color while treating unconverged references, unequal-time comparisons, denoiser and temporal-reuse bias, scene- vs display-referred color errors, and white-furnace energy failures as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。