スキルを探す

Use when adding or auditing Agentlas skill lifecycle metadata, skill-registry.json, trial evidence, Curator promotion decisions, or first-class skill promotion gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding or auditing local runtime behavior that turns a project folder into an Agentlas-aware workspace with .agentlas memory and sitemap files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when generating or auditing a multi-role agent team package with orchestrator, PM Soul, Memory Curator, Policy Gate, workers, eval, QA, handoffs, and runtime adapters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run GDScript test suites from the command line with `godot --headless`, using a SceneTree/MainLoop runner script that exits non-zero on failure so CI can gate merges. Use when a Godot project needs unit tests without opening the editor, when wiring a CI job (GitHub Actions or similar) that must fail the build on a failing `.gd` test, or when a `godot --headless` invocation hangs, opens a window, or exits 0 despite failed assertions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to use d3k, run/dev/test/debug a web project with d3k, or reproduce a browser issue. Own the runtime: reuse or background-start d3k non-interactively, wait for readiness, use its project-stable managed Chrome profile, and inspect unified browser/server evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, update or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides Microsoft Entra ID app registration, OAuth 2.0 authentication, and MSAL integration. USE FOR: create app registration, register Azure AD app, configure OAuth, set up authentication, add API permissions, generate service principal, MSAL example, console app auth, Entra ID setup, Azure AD authentication. DO NOT USE FOR: Key Vault secrets (use azure-keyvault-expiration-audit), general Azure resource security guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify that Minutes is properly set up and working — model downloaded, mic accessible, directories exist, no stale state. Use when the user says "is minutes working", "check my setup", "verify minutes", "test recording setup", "why isn't minutes working", "minutes health check", or after running setup for the first time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gate a pitch against one journalist at a time. Runs the pair through proven media-relations checks (last-10-bylines audit, 90-day topic sweep, beat-vs-angle-vs-one-off, the 5 forms of journalism, source-mirror, stated-preferences, database triangulation) and returns fit, soft-fit, no-fit, or unknown with a real recent anchor and specific edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gate a prompt universe for schema and provenance completeness, target or campaign contamination, evidence entailment, naturalness, one-concept clarity, architecture consistency, aided status, answer leakage, and semantic duplicates. Use after realistic prompt generation and before human panel selection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews test code to identify and fix common testing anti-patterns including flaky tests, over-mocking, brittle assertions, test interdependency, and hidden test logic. Flags bad patterns, explains the specific defect, and provides corrected implementations. Use when reviewing test code, debugging intermittent or unreliable test failures, or when the user mentions flaky tests, test smells, brittle tests, test isolation issues, mock overuse, slow tests, or test maintenance problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates explicit validation checkpoints (verification gates) between project phases to catch errors early and ensure quality before proceeding. Use when the user asks about quality gates, milestone checks, phase transitions, approval steps, go/no-go decision points, or preventing cascading errors across a multi-step workflow. Produces acceptance criteria checklists, automated CI gate configurations, manual sign-off requirements, and conditional review rules for scenarios such as security changes, API changes, or database migrations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides the red-green-refactor TDD workflow: write a failing test first, implement the minimum code to make it pass, then refactor while keeping tests green. Use when a user asks to practice TDD, write tests first, follow red-green-refactor, do test-driven development, write failing tests before code, or phrases like 'make the test pass', 'test coverage', or 'unit tests before implementation'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the scientific method to debugging by helping users form specific, testable hypotheses, design targeted experiments, and systematically confirm or reject theories to find root causes. Use when a user says their code isn't working, they're getting an error, something broke, they want to troubleshoot a bug, or they're trying to figure out what's causing an issue. Concrete actions include isolating failing components, forming and testing hypotheses, analyzing error messages, tracing execution paths, and interpreting test results to narrow down root causes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discovers, searches, and installs skills from multiple AI agent skill marketplaces (400K+ skills) using the SkillKit CLI. Supports browsing official partner collections (Anthropic, Vercel, Supabase, Stripe, and more) and community repositories, searching by domain or technology, and installing specific skills from GitHub. Use when the user wants to find, browse, or install new agent skills, plugins, extensions, or add-ons; asks 'is there a skill for X' or 'find a skill for X'; wants to explore a skill store or marketplace; needs to extend agent capabilities in areas like React, testing, DevOps, security, or APIs; or says 'browse skills', 'search skill marketplace', 'install a skill', or 'what skills are available'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies proven testing patterns — Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA), Given-When-Then, Test Data Builders, Object Mother, parameterized tests, fixtures, spies, and test doubles — to help write maintainable, reliable, and readable test suites. Use when the user asks about writing unit tests, integration tests, or end-to-end tests; structuring test cases or test suites; applying TDD or BDD practices; working with mocks, stubs, spies, or fakes; improving test coverage or reducing flakiness; or needs guidance on test organization, naming conventions, or assertions in frameworks like Jest, Vitest, pytest, or similar.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate educational practice questions from lecture notes to test student understanding. Use when users request practice questions, exam preparation materials, study guides, or assessment items based on lecture content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintenance orchestrator for the brooks-lint plugin itself. Runs a sequential subagent pipeline — author → eval → QA → trigger-audit → release — to add or edit a skill, refresh the eval suite, keep the four manifests + all README translations + CHANGELOG + AGENTS/GEMINI in sync, audit trigger boundaries, and cut releases. Drives the five agents in .codex/agents/ (skill-author, eval-curator, consistency-qa, trigger-boundary-auditor, release-manager). Triggers when the maintainer asks to work ON brooks-lint itself: "add a new skill", "edit the brooks-debt guide", "update the eval suite", "fix the trigger descriptions", "make this change and validate it", "release brooks-lint", "bump and publish", and follow-ups: "re-run", "re-validate", "update that skill", "redo the audit", "do the X part again". Do NOT trigger for: USING the brooks-lint analysis skills on some target codebase (that's brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test / brooks-health / brooks-sweep); generic questions about brooks-lint that don't ask to change it; or maintenance of a different plugin.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow execution, poor readability. Triggers when: user asks about test quality, shares test files for review, or expresses frustration: "tests keep breaking whenever I change anything", "our tests take forever", "tests pass but bugs still reach production", or "we have too many mocks". Do NOT trigger for: writing new tests from scratch (use the regular test-writing workflow) or testing framework/syntax questions — this skill reviews an existing suite for structural quality problems, not individual test authoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintenance orchestrator for the brooks-lint plugin itself. Runs a sequential subagent pipeline — author → eval → QA → trigger-audit → release — to add or edit a skill, refresh the eval suite, keep the four manifests + all README translations + CHANGELOG + AGENTS/GEMINI in sync, audit trigger boundaries, and cut releases. Drives the five agents in .claude/agents/ (skill-author, eval-curator, consistency-qa, trigger-boundary-auditor, release-manager). Triggers when the maintainer asks to work ON brooks-lint itself: "add a new skill", "edit the brooks-debt guide", "update the eval suite", "fix the trigger descriptions", "make this change and validate it", "release brooks-lint", "bump and publish", and follow-ups: "re-run", "re-validate", "update that skill", "redo the audit", "do the X part again". Do NOT trigger for: USING the brooks-lint analysis skills on some target codebase (that's brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test / brooks-health / brooks-sweep); generic questions about brooks-lint that don't ask to change it; or maintenance of a different plugin.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants to "fix everything", "sweep the codebase", "auto-fix all issues", "clean up the whole project", or asks for a single command that both diagnoses and remediates quality problems. Do NOT trigger for: read-only audits or health reports where the user only wants findings without code changes; single-dimension reviews (use the focused skill instead: brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test); server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to audit architecture, review folder/module structure, check for circular imports, understand how the codebase is organized, or asks "does this follow clean architecture?" or "why does everything depend on everything?". Also triggers for onboarding requests: "explain this codebase to a new developer" or "give me a codebase tour" (use onboarding mode). Do NOT trigger for: PR-level code review (use brooks-review) or line-level refactoring questions — this skill analyzes structural/module-level concerns, not individual functions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a qualitative risk register and mitigation plan using a Probability x Impact matrix. Use when a project needs structured risk identification, scoring, ownership, and response planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a structured Azure incident response workflow for triage, diagnosis, mitigation, and root cause analysis. Use when operations or security teams need guided incident handling for Azure service symptoms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。