スキルを探す

Start the dev server, discover API routes from the codebase, hit every endpoint, and report which ones return errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit PostHog experiments and feature flags for configuration issues, staleness, and best-practice violations. Read when the user asks to audit, health-check, or review experiments or feature flags, check flag hygiene, or verify experiment setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add feature flags to an application for gradual rollouts, A/B testing, and kill switches using PostHog, LaunchDarkly, or a simple local implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Cursor's browser aria snapshots to audit a page for accessibility issues — missing labels, broken tab order, contrast, and ARIA misuse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author useful, low-noise log alerts on services in a PostHog project. Use when the user asks to set up alerts for their logs, suggest alerts they should add, or evaluate whether a service is worth monitoring. Covers service triage, baseline characterisation, threshold drafting, back-testing via simulate, and shipping with a notification destination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit every endpoint in a PostHog project for staleness, failed materialisations, and unused materialised versions. Use when the user asks "what endpoints can I clean up?", "are any of my endpoints broken?", "which materialised versions are still being called?", or wants a one-shot cleanup pass over the Endpoints product. Produces a prioritised report grouped by issue type, with recommended actions but does not modify anything without explicit confirmation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze session replay patterns across experiment variants to understand user behavior differences. Use when the user wants to see how users interact with different experiment variants, identify usability issues, compare behavior patterns between control and test groups, or get qualitative insights to complement quantitative experiment results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the health of a PostHog project's data warehouse — find every broken or degraded pipeline item across sources, sync schemas, materialized views, batch exports, and transformations. Use when the user asks "what's broken in my warehouse?", "give me a health check", "audit my data pipeline", "why are some dashboards stale?", or wants a one-shot triage summary before deciding where to spend time. Produces a prioritized report of issues grouped by severity and type, with recommended next steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests associations between categorical variables in clinical data using chi-square, Fisher's exact, Boschloo, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel, and modern McNemar variants with calibrated confidence intervals (Wilson, Newcombe, Miettinen-Nurminen). Use when analyzing categorical outcomes, paired binary endpoints, or testing treatment-outcome independence in confirmatory or exploratory clinical trials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnostic test / biomarker accuracy — sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, likelihood ratios, accuracy from a 2x2 table; ROC curve, AUC, and the optimal cutoff (Youden) for a continuous biomarker; and post-test probability via Bayes. Use when you have test results vs a gold standard (binary 2x2, or a continuous score + true labels) and need to judge how good the test is, pick a threshold, or compute the probability of disease given a result. Emphasizes the prevalence-dependence of PPV/NPV.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Controls error rates across thousands of simultaneous tests in genomics discovery using false-discovery-rate methods (Benjamini-Hochberg 1995; Benjamini-Yekutieli 2001 for arbitrary dependence; Storey q-value with pi0 estimation; local FDR; independent filtering Bourgon 2010; covariate-weighted FDR via IHW Ignatiadis 2016), plus family-wise error control (Bonferroni, Holm) and the GWAS genome-wide threshold. Covers the FDR-versus-FWER choice as the discovery-versus-confirmatory distinction, the dependence assumptions behind BH (PRDS) versus BY, pi0 estimation, the independent-filtering and false-coverage-rate traps, and reproducibility ranking via IDR (Li 2011). Use when correcting p-values from genome-wide tests, choosing between BH/BY/q-value/Bonferroni, setting an FDR threshold, applying IHW or independent filtering, or interpreting q-values. For confirmatory trials with few pre-specified endpoints (closed testing, graphical/gatekeeping), see clinical-biostatistics/multiplicity-graphical.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, Toxicity) profiling for drug candidates. Integrates ADMET-AI predictions, SwissADME drug-likeness, PubChemTox experimental toxicity, ChEMBL clinical data, Lipinski rule-of-five, and CYP interaction data. Use for drug-likeness assessment, BBB penetration, bioavailability, hepatotoxicity prediction, ADME/PK profiling, or screening compound libraries before lab testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes chemical libraries by scaffold using Bemis-Murcko scaffolds, generic frameworks, cyclic skeletons, matched molecular pair (MMP) analysis via mmpdb, R-group decomposition, Free-Wilson analysis, scaffold hopping, and chemotype-aware ML train/test splits. Use when identifying chemotype clusters in a library, deriving SAR transformation rules, decomposing series into R-groups, performing scaffold-balanced QSAR splits, or planning analog campaigns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates docked / generated protein-ligand poses using PoseBusters physical-validity tests, strain energy quantification, geometric checks (planarity, vdW overlap, bond/angle distortion), and pose-energy reasonableness. Filters AI-docking outputs (DiffDock, EquiBind, NeuralPLexer) where ~50% of poses fail physical-validity tests. Use when QC-ing docking results, comparing classical vs ML docking outputs, or filtering pose lists before SAR analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated LLM-driven hypothesis generation and testing on tabular datasets. Use when you want to systematically explore hypotheses about patterns in empirical data (e.g., deception detection, content analysis). Combines literature insights with data-driven hypothesis testing. For manual hypothesis formulation use hypothesis-generation; for creative ideation use scientific-brainstorming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Completes the online SBTI personality test at sbti.fancc.de5.net, answers all single-choice questions using the model's default personality and stable behavioral tendencies, submits the test, and returns the final type, match percentage, result description, and fifteen-dimension scores. Use when the user asks to take the SBTI test, run the SBTI quiz, get an SBTI result, or complete that personality test website for them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use every time you push a commit to an active pull request, to verify the PR is truly stable before reporting merge readiness. Covers the post-push wait window, AI review audit (Copilot/Greptile/Codex), and the gh commands to snapshot PR state. Trigger on "I pushed" or "is the PR ready to merge".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey a codebase's animation and motion code as a senior motion advisor, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the animations", "audit the motion", "make this app feel better", or wants a roadmap of animation fixes rather than a review of a single diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an animation from scratch, making the decisions in the order that determines whether it feels right — should it animate at all, what purpose, which tool, which properties, which curve and duration, how it interrupts, how it exits. Writes the implementation. Use when asked to animate something, add motion, make a component feel alive, or build a transition. For critiquing existing motion use review-animations; for auditing a whole codebase use improve-animations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-PR verification for VenTu — tests, data validation, static build, and e2e for the touched surface. Use before opening any PR. For visual UI checks also load ventu-verify-ui.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes the next failing test based on provided design doc and existing todo tests

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes work-in-progress code and tests based on design doc

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Progressively activates todo tests one at a time, updates implementation code until each passes (verified via Wallaby), checks off matching design doc progress, then moves to the next—following the design doc as the single source of truth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs Charted Coding iterations in a loop — route via charted-continue, batch red or green work for an entire test file, commit, then repeat until the PR is complete. Infers design doc and PR number when omitted. Use when the user invokes charted loop, wants batch TDD for a PR test file, or asks to continue charted work with commits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。