スキルを探す

Use when you need a runnable PyTorch training repo for a medical-imaging task (segmentation, classification, detection, synthesis, self-supervised, or fine-tuning a pretrained backbone). Emits a patient-level seed-locked split, train/evaluate scripts, config and a Methods stub.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building or auditing a radiomics or tabular clinical-ML prediction model with a classical learner (LASSO, SVM, random forest, XGBoost and similar). Enforces nested CV, dimensionality control, in-fold feature selection, feature stability, calibration and external validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing someone else's manuscript for a journal, such as after a review invitation or for a revised R1/R2 version. Drafts a structured, constructive review in the journal's format. Never for your own manuscript; that is /self-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a medical AI paper should be found and cited by AI search engines and RAG tools. Optimizes the title, abstract, summary box (Key Points, Research in Context), keywords, preprint, GitHub README/CITATION.cff and Hugging Face card, returning a visible pass/fail checklist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a target journal has no profile yet. Reads the journal's author guidelines and writes a detailed /write-paper profile plus a compact /find-journal profile, public or user-local private, in the canonical format with quality gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when analyzing a researcher's publication record from PubMed. Fetches an author's papers, classifies study types and author position, charts the patterns and writes a strategy report, with an optional trajectory-archetype classification. Works from PubMed metadata only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when one validated cohort analysis must be repeated across many exposure/outcome pairs. Generates one R/Python script per combination from a single methodology template, changing only the variables, and aggregates the results into a summary matrix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning how many patients or cases a study needs before data collection (power analysis, IRB justification). Walks a decision tree to the right test and returns reproducible R/Python code and IRB-ready justification text. Analyzing collected data is /analyze-stats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing a manuscript item by item against a reporting guideline or risk-of-bias tool. Covers 49 reporting guidelines and risk-of-bias tools (STROBE, CONSORT, STARD, TRIPOD+AI, PRISMA, QUADAS and more), marking each item PRESENT, PARTIAL or MISSING. Not a reviewer critique (/self-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a clinical CSV/Excel dataset needs profiling and cleaning before analysis (missing values, outliers, duplicates, type mismatches). Profiles, flags and generates cleaning code in three stages, each gated on the researcher's approval. Never auto-cleans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when sending local changes back to the project (an added journal profile, a fixed checklist item, an adapted skill) or reporting a false positive or bug. Finds what changed, scans it for patient data, shows every line and sends nothing until you confirm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when comparing an exposure-outcome association across countries with parallel national surveys (KNHANES, NHANES, CHNS). Harmonizes variables, runs parallel weighted analyses and builds comparison tables for 2-country (KR+US) or 3-country (KR+US+CN) designs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when exposure, outcome, covariate or eligibility definitions and cutoffs need a citable basis before the protocol. Reads the data dictionary first, then maps each variable to a guideline or published definition and the database columns in a citation-backed table.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing a study that benchmarks AI systems against a human-expert panel, before data collection. Plans the arms, decoupled rubrics with anchors, planted calibration probes, reviewer panel, inter-rater reliability targets and LLM-as-judge versus human adjudication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。