スキルを探す

Implement reactive state management using Riverpod 3.x with code generation in Flutter. Use when defining providers, building AsyncNotifiers, or overriding providers in tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build HTTP services, REST APIs, and middleware in Go. Use when building Go HTTP servers, REST APIs, or custom middleware.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Core idioms, style guides, and best practices for writing idiomatic Go code. Use when writing Go code following official style guides and idiomatic patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Go developer toolchain — gopls LSP diagnostics, linting, formatting, and vet. Use when setting up Go tooling, running linters, or integrating gopls with Claude Code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement context-less navigation, named routes, and middleware using GetX. Use when building navigation with GetX routing in Flutter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement typed routes, redirection, and guards using go_router in Flutter. Use when changing go_router navigation; defer widget tests that merely assert redirect behavior and defer slide/transition animation work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add Flutter translation assets, locale initialization, localized strings, locale switching, and plurals with easy_localization and CSV or JSON files. Use for Flutter i18n work; not RTL-only layout or locale-specific date formatting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Captures redacted, provenance-aware cybersecurity observations with shared status fields, independent ground truth, and honest limitations. Use when recording exercise evidence, findings, validation results, or security-review handoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standardize dynamic application security testing for backend APIs, frontend web apps, and mobile clients. Covers ZAP, Nuclei, Nikto, sqlmap, ffuf, browser automation, mobile proxy interception, and AI-driven curl probes. Use when advising on or running dynamic security scans on local/staging environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforce "No Exploit, No Report" policy with PoC construction standards, false-positive filtering, and evidence collection per vulnerability class across backend, frontend, and mobile. Use when validating security findings, constructing exploit proofs, filtering false positives, or writing pentest findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dart 3.x language feature standards: null safety, records, sealed classes, switch pattern matching, extensions, and async/await. Use when using !, ?., ??, late, sealed classes, record types, switch expressions, or async patterns — and before introducing any new Dart 3.x construct to confirm the modern idiomatic approach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts hypothesis-driven, evidence-preserving threat hunts with bounded negative conclusions and telemetry-gap handling. Use for hunt hypotheses, scoped offline analysis, or analytic follow-up; not unscoped scanning, malware execution, or generic intelligence summaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adjudicates authorized exercise outcomes against independently held ground truth, redacted evidence, and explicit status boundaries. Use when comparing observations, resolving discrepancies, or preparing evidence-led security-review handoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts bounded cybersecurity engagement plans with objectives, scope, exclusions, roles, authorization, runtime controls, evidence, stop criteria, and restart gates. Use when preparing an exercise or assessment plan before execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates defensive controls with paired authorized action and observation evidence, distinguishing blocked, prevented, detected, responded, and telemetry-gap outcomes. Use for purple-team validation design or offline fixture review; not unsanctioned testing or production efficacy claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates cyber exercise authorization, scope, exclusions, runtime controls, expiry, stop and restart gates. Use when planning or reviewing authorized security activity, scope drift, or unsupported execution environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Troubleshoot systematically using the Scientific Method. Use when debugging crashes, tracing errors, diagnosing unexpected behavior, or investigating exceptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive Google Stitch over MCP safely - read screens, write and lint DESIGN.md, create design systems, and fix designs through variants instead of overwriting. Use when reviewing, editing, or generating Stitch screens or DESIGN.md files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate user-facing release notes for the App Store and Google Play from git history (App Store <=4000 chars, Google Play <=500). Use when generating release notes, app store changelog, play store release, or "what's new" text for a mobile app.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintains sparse, reviewable cybersecurity framework edges with versioned IDs, relation, rationale, source, and review status. Use when mapping exercise observations or procedures to NIST, ATT&CK, or another named framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rules for writing concise, token-efficient workflow and skill files. Prevents over-building that requires costly optimization passes. Use when creating or editing workflow files, SKILL.md files, or new skill definitions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standardizes visual audits, responsive design, and behavioral testing for web apps. Use to verify a web UI fix or cross-browser behavior; defer backend API refactors, Playwright installation/tooling setup, and Appium/mobile automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infer the requesting operator's technical fluency from message content (never ask directly) and adapt register — business, hybrid, or technical — across SDLC workflow output. Use when starting sdlc, brainstorm-feature, plan-feature, verify-work, publish-notes, or session-report, or whenever a request's phrasing signals a non-technical or cross-stack operator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides quality-first TDD for new behavior, bug fixes, and test changes. Selects the smallest test layer, proves a distinct regression risk, and runs bounded RED-GREEN-REFACTOR verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。