57 件（addyosmani のリポジトリ） ・ 人気順
概要と使いどころ
Records decisions and documentation. Use when you need to document an architecture decision (ADR) or the reasoning behind a design choice, when changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) for better page experience using field and lab evidence. Use when asked to "improve Core Web Vitals", "fix LCP", "reduce CLS", "optimize INP", "page experience optimization", or "fix layout shifts".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize web performance for faster loading and better user experience. Use when asked to "speed up my site", "optimize performance", "reduce load time", "fix slow loading", "improve page speed", or "performance audit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an evidence-led web quality audit covering performance, accessibility, SEO, best practices, and agentic browsing. Use when asked to "audit my site", "review web quality", "run lighthouse audit", "check page quality", or "optimize my website".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize for search engine visibility and ranking. Use when asked to "improve SEO", "optimize for search", "fix meta tags", "add structured data", "sitemap optimization", or "search engine optimization".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.2 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply modern web development best practices for security, compatibility, and code quality. Use when asked to "apply best practices", "security audit", "modernize code", "code quality review", or "check for vulnerabilities".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft, rewrite, or review reader-facing prose so it is specific, useful, and recognizably the author's without inventing facts or performing humanness. Use for essays, articles, newsletters, documentation, talks, launch copy, and other important prose that feels generic, hollow, or AI-shaped. Supports co-write, rewrite, review, and lint modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claim one live GitHub queue item, implement it end to end, run fail-closed gates and independent verification, then open a draft PR. Use for one ready-to-implement issue or the implementation routine.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a ready-to-spec queue item into an approved plan through explicit human gates. Use when an item needs scope decided before code exists, when planning a feature, or before starting a migration. Runs interactively - not for unattended routines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scheduled health sweep that closes the factory loop - reads CI failures, recent commits, dependency and security advisories, and live queue labels, then files issues and writes an immutable run record. Use for the nightly or weekly monitor routine.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify an open factory PR before human review - re-runs gates, checks the test proves the fix, checks scope and test tampering. Use when reviewing a factory PR, running the PR review routine, or asked to independently check a change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claim and implement one ready GitHub issue, run fail-closed gates, obtain independent verification, and open a draft pull request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect factory health, stale work, CI, security advisories, and recent run evidence without implementing fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn an ambiguous factory issue into human-approved product, behavior, design, and implementation slices. Use interactively before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Show the factory control room from live GitHub labels, open PRs, recent run records, gate health, and charter limits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classify GitHub issues into the factory's live label queue and write an auditable snapshot. Use for backlog triage or a scheduled triage run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review factory evidence and propose tighter or looser constraints without editing the charter. Use for a periodic constraint review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Independently verify a factory pull request, including fail-closed gates, negative test proof, scope, and load-bearing review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classify incoming issues into the live GitHub label queue, reproduce where cheap, and write an auditable QUEUE.md snapshot. Use when triaging a backlog, running the scheduled triage routine, or deciding what the factory should pick up next.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent adversarial code review. Spawns three reviewer subagents (Auditor, Adversary, Pragmatist) on a single model, runs a cross-examination round, then deterministically synthesizes a single ranked report. Use this for non-trivial PRs, security-sensitive changes, refactors that touch many files, or any change where one perspective has obvious blind spots. Trigger phrases include "adverse review", "adversarial review", "multi-perspective review", "review my changes from multiple angles", "panel review". NOT suitable for trivial diffs (typos, dependency bumps, formatting).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Show the factory control room from live GitHub labels, open PRs, recent run records, gate health, and charter limits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review factory evidence and propose tighter or looser constraints without editing the charter. Use for a periodic constraint review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Independently verify a factory pull request, including fail-closed gates, negative test proof, scope, and load-bearing review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。