スキルを探す

Draft a Root Cause Analysis for an incident, outage, or repeated test failure. Unlike intake/spec/brd, RCA is not a workflow phase — it's a standalone postmortem artifact that often precedes a bugfix intake. Output lives at `docs/rca/<slug>.md`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cycle-end retrospective converting recurring judgment failures into durable enforcement. Reviews the cycle's friction — repeated user corrections, guard trips, RCA themes, integrate failures — and turns each recurring one into a landmines.md entry, then proposes graduation candidates up the enforcement funnel (landmine → advisory hook → hard gate). Pairs with standup: standup says what shipped and what's next; retrospective says what kept going wrong and how to stop it structurally. Writes only memory entries and a report — graduation proposals are advisory and require the normal seed.md amendment path to become enforcement. Invoke at the end of a release cycle, an epic, or any stretch of work with repeated friction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write executable failing tests from a recipe handed to you by the main context. Used by `/tdd` Step 2 and ad-hoc when a phase needs tests-first to drive implementation. Decisions about which scenarios to cover, which categories matter, and which fixtures to use are made by the caller — this skill executes that recipe with code-structure discipline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow Phase 2 — Codebase Scouting and Constraint Discovery. Maps the relevant slice of the codebase for a given task. Produces a scout report at `docs/scout/<slug>.md` naming the files, modules, and patterns the proposed work touches or constrains. Report decisions execute in main context with full conversation visibility; gathering MAY be delegated to read-only advisory subagents (seed.md §4.2-A).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow Phase 8 (optional) — OWASP-aligned security review of pending code changes. Produces a prioritized findings report (Critical/High/Medium/Low) mapped to OWASP Top 10 and CWE IDs. Output at `docs/security/<slug>-<date>.md`. Read-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow Phase 7 — Mechanical cleanup pass over the branch diff, followed by a `code-structure` review pass and a `verify` re-stamp. Shadows the global `simplify` skill at project scope; the cleanup pass is performed inline rather than via Skill self-call.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dev-only check that a drafted spec for THIS baseline repo won't ship dev-tree references to consumer installs. Catches three failure modes — shipped SKILL.md prose that references paths under `src/`, `tests/`, `scripts/`, `obj/` as runtime invocations (in ```bash fences``` OR `inline backticks`, plus shipped `.mjs`/`.js`/`.sh`/`.py` helper-file imports); new Python helpers added under `.claude/skills/<slug>/` (shipped helpers must be `.sh` or `.mjs`/`.js` going forward); and imports of modules that aren't in `obj/template/.claude/manifest.json` (consumer won't have the file). The aggregate scanner (`scan-shipped-skills.mjs`) walks only baseline-owned skill dirs (via `owner: baseline` frontmatter) at top level — `references/` and other subdirs are documentation, not runtime. BLOCKER findings hard-block implementation entry; ADVISORY surfaces but doesn't block. Read-only — surfaces a punch list; maintainer edits the spec and re-runs until CLEAN.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bootstrap the central system spec at `docs/system/` for a repository that has never had one. Scans the governed surface, proposes a concept map clustered by directory, and materializes elements + shards ONLY after a human confirms that map. Use when adopting the baseline on an existing project, or when the corpus needs re-deriving from scratch. Re-runnable. Requires `memory.architecture_map.enabled` and a declared `governed_surface`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a Workflow Phase 4 technical spec from an intake (and optionally a BRD + scout + research memo). The spec defines how the system will change: design (C4 + UML + dependency graph in PlantUML), data, APIs, tests, rollout, rollback. Output lives at `docs/specs/<slug>.md`. Never self-approves — approval happens via `/approve-direction`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The sprint completeness oracle — a mechanical, exit-code-driven check that every feature in a sprint manifest is provably complete across three dimensions (a done-record reference, resolvable edge tests, and a resolvable wiring test). Fails loud with a per-feature gap list naming the missing dimension. Read-only. Use to gate a sprint before it is called done (Slice A of the sprint-mode epic), or any time you want a completeness reading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose an MVP vision into a sprint manifest — a prioritized feature list where every feature carries explicit done-criteria (a done-record reference, named edge tests, and a wiring test). Produces the sprint manifest that `sprint-oracle` checks for completeness. Use when planning a sprint of parallel work (Slice A of the sprint-mode epic). Not a workflow phase; the manifest it writes is the completeness contract a sprint is held to.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose the next dependency-ready sprint from the ALREADY-DECOMPOSED roadmap — standup's active sibling. Reads docs/roadmap-execution-plan.md + the memory backlog, computes per-task readiness from the roadmap's machine-readable status, orders with roadmap-planner's graph engine, and emits a proposed task-set (sprint-plan manifest shape) with per-feature done-criteria, excluding unready tasks and naming their unmet prerequisite. PROPOSES ONLY — the human confirms/edits before /triage routes it (typically to the `power` track). Distinct from `sprint-plan`, which decomposes a fresh vision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a codebase and recommend Claude Code automations (hooks, subagents, skills, plugins, MCP servers). Use when user asks for automation recommendations, wants to optimize their Claude Code setup, mentions improving Claude Code workflows, asks how to first set up Claude Code for a project, or wants to know what Claude Code features they should use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow Phase 11 — Commit Preparation and Execution. Stages and commits the work. Requires `/grant-commit` first (Git Commit Guard enforces a 15-min ad-hoc consent window; inside a workflow the grant is slug-scoped and one grant covers the whole landing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to write, rewrite, or improve marketing copy for any page — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, about pages, or product pages. Also use when the user says "write copy for," "improve this copy," "rewrite this page," "marketing copy," "headline help," "CTA copy," "value proposition," "tagline," "subheadline," "hero section copy," "above the fold," "this copy is weak," "make this more compelling," or "help me describe my product." Use this whenever someone is working on website text that needs to persuade or convert. For email copy, see email-sequence. For popup copy, see popup-cro. For editing existing copy, see copy-editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow Phase 10 — orchestrator for documentation work. Surveys the diff, routes any page on a documentation surface through `technical-writer`, standalone technical reference through the `documentation` skill, tutorials through `technical-tutorials`, and all other prose body work (inline docs, README updates, user-facing copy) through the `prose` skill (which mandates `humanizer` and conditionally `copywriting`). Verifies completeness and marks phase done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Power batch-sprint helper — hosts the two behaviours that distinguish the `power` workflow track from spec-entry. (1) Per-ticket iteration: security runs once PER TICKET over workflow.json.tickets[] while the mechanical phases run once for the batch. (2) Commit split: at the commit phase, group the batch's working tree into ordered Conventional Commits via commit-split.mjs, closure last. Invoked within a `power`-track workflow; not a standalone feature. Opt-in via velocity.power_mode.enabled; requires git.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft or revise English prose for any brief — documentation body, intake problem statements, spec context, RCA summaries, marketing copy, README sections, PR descriptions. Mandatorily invokes `Skill(humanizer)` as the final pass on every draft. Conditionally invokes `copywriting` for persuasive register, `documentation` for reference docs, `technical-tutorials` for tutorials. Used when any phase needs human-readable prose written or rewritten. Composition only — research and register-picking happen in the caller's context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bring documentation prose down to a high-school reading level without losing precision. Runs after the content is written and before humanizer. Targets grade 9 on four measures — sentence length, vocabulary, clause load and jargon density — and carries the rewriting moves that actually shift them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow Phase 3 — Research and Solution Exploration. Surfaces 2–4 candidate solution approaches with concrete tradeoffs, grounded in current library docs (fetched through the provider named in `.claude/docs-provider.json`) — never in training-data recall. Output lives at `docs/research/<slug>.md`. Candidate ranking and the memo execute in main context; doc/source gathering MAY be delegated to read-only advisory subagents (seed.md §4.2-A).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Derive an execution roadmap from a project's vision/spec docs by first principles, then diff that fresh derivation against the existing roadmap to prove the task ORDER is correct. Use this whenever the user wants to review, validate, re-derive, or sanity-check an execution roadmap or delivery plan; asks whether the tasks/epics are "in the right order"; suspects a task is scheduled before its prerequisite (a producer-after-consumer / dependency-inversion error like "OpenAPI after the web client that consumes it", OR a cross-cutting inherited default like observability/auth/tenancy scheduled after the feature work that inherits it — a seam-after-consumer error); wants to find missing tasks, circular dependencies, or over-fragmented epics; or wants to compact a plan to raise velocity. Also trigger on "review the roadmap", "re-derive the plan from the spec", "is this the right build order", "check the dependency graph of our epics", "which task should come first". It reads the vision + spec corpus, decomposes actors → use-cases → modules → epics → typed tasks, identifies cross-cutting inherited-default seams, builds a real dependency graph with hard + soft (seam) edges (deterministic helper), breaks cycles, topologically orders, compacts, and emits a derived roadmap PLUS a delta report against the current one — it never blindly overwrites a hand-crafted roadmap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 10.6 — sync the project's execution roadmap (project.json → roadmap.path, default docs/roadmap-execution-plan.md) to the just-landed work. Flips the tasks named in workflow.json → roadmap_tasks[] from ⬜ to ✅ and promotes their epic headings ⬜→🟡→✅, preserving the standup parser format contract. On the epic track it appends instead — the epic's heading plus one row per slice — and stamps roadmap_epic back into the epic state. Also hosts the ad-hoc backfill that puts every epic already on disk onto the roadmap. Fail-open: never throws, no-ops when roadmap.path is unset/absent or no task matches, and never blocks a commit. Runs after /archive and before /memory-sync on every committing track.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only view of the execution roadmap. Lists every epic with its per-status tallies, nests the still-open rows beneath their epic, collapses wholly-finished epics into one rollup line, and closes by naming the next planned task in file order. Four verbs — `list` (the reader's view), `tasks` and `epics` (filterable row and epic queries), `next` (the first planned task). Invoke any time to see what is left to build. Not a workflow phase; never writes; never starts or commits work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-consistency review of a drafted spec's diagrams. Verifies that C4 components appear in the dependency graph, class-diagram changes have matching DDL, every AC resolves to a concrete sequence, and the dependency graph is acyclic. Read-only. Run after `/spec-lint` passes and before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。