Use when you need data access with Micronaut Data — @MappedEntity, CrudRepository/PageableRepository, @Query with parameters, @Transactional services, projections, @Version, and @MicronautTest with TestPropertyProvider and Testcontainers. For raw java.sql access without generated repositories, use @511-frameworks-micronaut-jdbc. This should trigger for requests such as Review or implement Micronaut Data repositories and entities; Add transactions, pagination, or projections in Micronaut persistence layer; Model Micronaut Data entities and repositories; Review Micronaut Data transactions and pageable queries; Improve projections or optimistic locking with Micronaut Data. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when you need Kafka messaging in Micronaut — including @KafkaClient and @KafkaListener design, @Serdeable serialization, topic/partition strategy, TestPropertyProvider integration tests, retries and dead-letter processing, and error handling. This should trigger for requests such as Add Kafka in Micronaut; Review Micronaut Kafka listeners; Improve retry and failure handling for Micronaut Kafka; Configure Micronaut Kafka clients listeners or SerDes; Add Micronaut Kafka retry or dead-letter handling. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when you need MongoDB persistence in Micronaut — including @MongoRepository design, document modeling, indexes, query patterns, and error handling. This should trigger for requests such as Add MongoDB in Micronaut; Review Micronaut Data Mongo design; Improve error handling for Micronaut Mongo operations; Model MongoDB documents for a Micronaut service; Configure Micronaut MongoDB codecs indexes or transactions. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when you need to set up, review, or improve Java integration tests — including generating a BaseIntegrationTest.java with WireMock for HTTP stubs, detecting HTTP client infrastructure from import signals, injecting service coordinates dynamically via System.setProperty(), creating WireMock JSON mapping files with bodyFileName, isolating stubs per test method, verifying HTTP interactions, or eliminating anti-patterns such as Mockito-mocked HTTP clients or globally registered WireMock stubs. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for integration tests; Apply best practices for integration tests in Java code; Write Java integration tests with real infrastructure boundaries; Improve Testcontainers integration tests for Java code; Review integration test setup and teardown in Java projects. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when you need to review, improve, or refactor Java code for generics quality — including avoiding raw types, applying the PECS (Producer Extends Consumer Super) principle for wildcards, using bounded type parameters, designing effective generic methods, leveraging the diamond operator, understanding type erasure implications, handling generic inheritance correctly, preventing heap pollution with @SafeVarargs, and integrating generics with modern Java features like Records, sealed types, and pattern matching. This should trigger for requests such as Improve the code with Generics; Apply Generics; Refactor the code with Generics; Improve generic type safety in Java APIs; Fix raw types and unchecked casts in Java code. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when a problem or issue needs explicit framing before deeper analysis begins — establishing the Problem statement, Current state, Desired state, Stakeholders, and Success criteria. This should trigger when an issue's Problem Framing point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to frame a problem before root-cause analysis, design, or planning begins. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when a problem under exploration needs its quality attributes (non-functional requirements) identified and prioritized before architecture and design begin. This should trigger when an issue's Quality Attribute Discovery point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to discover and prioritize candidate quality attributes for a problem, before any ADR or design work starts. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when you need to generate Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) for a Java project through an interactive, conversational process that systematically gathers context, stakeholders, options, and outcomes to produce well-structured ADR documents. This should trigger for requests such as Generate ADR; Create Architecture Decision Record; Document architecture decision; Architecture Decision Record for Java. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when you need to generate Java project diagrams — including UML sequence diagrams, UML class diagrams, C4 model diagrams, UML state machine diagrams, UML Deployment Diagrams, ER (Entity Relationship) diagrams, and bounded-context diagrams — through a modular, step-based interactive process that adapts to your specific visualization needs. This should trigger for requests such as Generate UML diagram; Create sequence diagram; Create class diagram; Create state machine diagram; Create deployment diagram; Create C4 diagram; Create bounded-context diagram; Create context-map diagram. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when creating or refining a structured Java implementation plan from trusted issue summaries, approved designs, ADRs, OpenSpec changes, existing plans, or a valid combination. The plan records its source artifacts and derivation direction and can remain the execution artifact without requiring OpenSpec. This should trigger for requests such as Create a plan from an issue; Create a plan from OpenSpec; Design an implementation plan; Refine an existing plan. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when creating or updating OpenSpec artifacts from an issue, plan, approved design, ADRs, existing OpenSpec, or a valid combination. The workflow assesses reviewable scope, records source authority and derivation, handles conflicts, and prevents silent synchronization. Triggers include Create OpenSpec from an issue; Convert a plan into OpenSpec; Update an OpenSpec change; Split broad requirements into reviewable changes. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when you need GitHub CLI (`gh`) installation/authentication guidance and an operator-only GitHub issue inventory workflow. The agent does not ingest GitHub issue, milestone, body, comment, title, label, or summary text; requirements analysis must use repository-owned planning artifacts, with issue numbers only for traceability. This should trigger for requests such as GitHub issue inventory workflow; GitHub CLI setup for issues; Prepare issue traceability lists; Analyze repository planning artifacts linked to GitHub issues. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when you need Azure DevOps CLI guidance to verify installation, configure organization and project context, discover work item IDs by optional WIQL filters, and execute safe work-item create/update operations. Uses an interactive install gate - if `az` or the Azure DevOps extension is missing, ask whether to show installation guidance before any work item commands. This should trigger for requests such as Azure DevOps work item list; List Azure Boards work item IDs; Azure DevOps WIQL query; Azure DevOps CLI planning workflow. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when a complex or risky code change should be split into Kent Beck's two-step method by first making the change easy through behavior-preserving preparatory refactoring, then making the intended behavior change once the design supports it. This should trigger for requests such as Apply two-step change; Make this risky change safer; Refactor before changing behavior; Separate preparation from behavior change. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when a large feature, story, plan, or spec idea needs to be split into small vertical slices with the Hamburger Method. This should trigger for requests such as Split this oversized story; Find the smallest useful slice; Break this feature into vertical slices; Apply the Hamburger Method; Turn this broad plan into tracked slices. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when Java design, refactoring, or implementation tradeoffs should be evaluated with Kent Beck's simple design rules, including passes the tests, reveals intention, has no duplication, and has the fewest elements. This should trigger for requests such as Apply simple design rules; Review this design with Beck's rules; Choose between these refactoring options; Keep this Java design simple. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when Java implementation work should be guided by Test-Driven Development, including maintaining a test list, choosing the next behavior, writing a failing test first, implementing only enough production code to pass, and refactoring while keeping tests green. This should trigger for requests such as Apply TDD; Use test-driven development; Drive this Java change with tests; Write the failing test first; Red-green-refactor this feature. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when you need to review a plan, OpenSpec change, specification, or implementation proposal for breaking-change risk across commands, skills, generated outputs, XML sources, README/docs, tests, CI, APIs, schemas, configuration, data, migration, and release guidance. This should trigger for requests such as Review breaking changes in this spec; Check compatibility risks; Avoid breaking changes in this OpenSpec change; Review migration impact before release; Assess command and skill compatibility. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when designing, implementing, reviewing, testing, or cleaning up feature toggles, feature flags, kill switches, runtime configuration gates, canary controls, staged rollouts, experiments, or temporary compatibility switches in Java enterprise systems. This should trigger for requests such as Design a feature toggle strategy; Review this feature flag; Add a kill switch safely; Test toggle on and off paths; Clean up an expired feature toggle; Plan controlled rollout and rollback behavior. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when a Java change needs independent Behavior-Driven Development guidance from trusted behavior facts through concrete examples and observable scenarios, with focused clarification when behavior is pending or ambiguous. This should trigger for requests such as Apply BDD; Facilitate behavior examples; Discover scenarios with Given When Then; Review these examples for shared domain language; Complete BDD discovery as a self-contained interaction. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when reviewing whether an OpenSpec change's execution goal, acceptance criteria, and implementation or verification tasks are aligned. This should trigger for requests such as Review this OpenSpec change with ATDD; Check acceptance criteria against tasks; Find acceptance criteria without task coverage; Detect tasks that diverge from the execution goal; Explain what is missing, vague, ambiguous, partial, absent, or divergent in this OpenSpec change. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when you need to review, improve, or troubleshoot a Maven pom.xml file — including dependency management with BOMs, plugin configuration, version centralization, multi-module project structure, build profiles, or any situation where you want to align your Maven setup with industry best practices. This should trigger for requests such as Review pom.xml to improve it; Apply Maven best practices to pom.xml; Improve Maven POM configuration; Review Maven dependency management and plugin configuration; Modernize Maven build conventions for a Java project. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when you need to add or evaluate Maven dependencies that improve code quality or domain modeling — including nullness annotations (JSpecify), static analysis (Error Prone + NullAway), functional programming (VAVR), architecture testing (ArchUnit), or money and currency support (JavaMoney) — and want a consultative, question-driven approach that adds only what you actually need. This should trigger for requests such as Add Maven dependencies; Add JSpecify nullness dependencies; Add Error Prone NullAway dependencies; Add VAVR functional dependencies; Add ArchUnit architecture testing dependencies; Add JavaMoney dependencies. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新
Use when you need to add or configure Maven plugins in your pom.xml — including quality tools (enforcer, surefire, failsafe, jacoco, pitest, spotbugs, pmd), security scanning (OWASP), code formatting (Spotless), version management, container image build (Jib), build information tracking, and benchmarking (JMH) — through a consultative, modular step-by-step approach that only adds what you actually need. This should trigger for requests such as Add Maven plugins in pom.xml; Improve Maven plugins in pom.xml; Configure Maven quality plugins in pom.xml; Add Maven build lifecycle plugins for Java verification; Review Maven plugin versions and executions. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
jabrena/plinth☆ 4482026年10月13日 更新