「alternatives」の検索結果

Build a weighted decision matrix to evaluate options. Use when the user says "decision matrix", "compare options", "weighted scoring", "which option should we choose", "evaluate alternatives", "Wiegers priority matrix", "force field analysis", "decision table", "trade-off analysis", "option comparison" - even if they don't explicitly say "decision matrix".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designing Lookup vs Master-Detail vs Hierarchical vs External relationships: cascade delete, roll-up summaries, ownership, sharing implications, polymorphic lookups, junction objects, relationship depth limits. NOT for restricting which records a lookup can pick — use admin/lookup-filter-cross-object-patterns. NOT for a roll-up across a plain lookup — use data/roll-up-summary-alternatives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shifts Layer 3 model selection to cost-optimized alternatives when economy mode is active.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Problem redefinition before problem solving. Takes a stated problem, extracts its premises, then spawns reframers applying different lenses (problem-vs-symptom, scope-shift, stakeholder-shift, level-of-abstraction, time-horizon, inversion, category-shift, constraints-shift) in isolation, and synthesizes the alternatives into a report with an orchestrator recommendation. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture architectural decisions made during Claude Code sessions as structured ADRs. Auto-detects decision moments, records context, alternatives considered, and rationale. Maintains an ADR log so future developers understand why the codebase is shaped the way it is.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to measure performance baselines, detect regressions before/after PRs, and compare stack alternatives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'battle card,' or 'competitor teardown.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discovers custom modules (>100 LOC), analyzes purpose, searches OSS alternatives via MCP Research, evaluates quality (stars, license, CVE), generates migration plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to measure command execution time or optimize a feedback loop. Records explicit measurements and recommends faster alternatives such as unit tests versus integration tests. It is opt-in; it does not run on every command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React useEffect best practices from official docs. Use when writing/reviewing useEffect, useState for derived values, data fetching, or state synchronization. Teaches when NOT to use Effect and better alternatives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches and compares free and open source software projects in a supplied domain, using either user-named candidates or a discovered shortlist. Use when evaluating FOSS alternatives, comparing GitHub popularity, maintenance, licences, domain fit, trade-offs, or producing a linked HTML comparison report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate or compare multiple technical approaches for one validated decision. Do not use for product discovery or an existing plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a raw idea into ONE honest recommendation: interview one question at a time until the problem, requirements, goals, non-goals, and constraints are CONFIRMED, then deliver a single verdict — do, don't, cheaper alternatives, trade-offs, ordered checklist, success metrics. Required: the user wants exactly ONE recommendation — not options, not a debate — and their framing is open to challenge (advise may answer a different question than the one asked). Triggers on "what should I do about X", "advise me on X", "am I approaching this right", "is this the right move". Do NOT use to be interrogated with no recommendation (→ mk:grill) — advise also interviews one question at a time, but only to reach a verdict. Do NOT use when the framing is settled and only the options are open (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to decide whether something is worth building (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when you want several perspectives to argue it out (→ mk:party).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Semantic image-text matching with CLIP and alternatives. Use for image search, zero-shot classification, similarity matching. NOT for counting objects, fine-grained classification (celebrities, car models), spatial reasoning, or compositional queries. Activate on "CLIP", "embeddings", "image similarity", "semantic search", "zero-shot classification", "image-text matching".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects and fixes color contrast violations using WCAG 2.1 guidelines and perceptual analysis. Expert in contrast ratio calculation, color blindness simulation, and providing accessible alternatives. Activate on "check contrast", "color accessibility", "WCAG audit", "readability check", "contrast ratio", "hard to read", "can't see text". NOT for general color theory (use color-theory-palette-harmony-expert), brand color selection (use web-design-expert), or non-visual accessibility (use ux-friction-analyzer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Differential abundance (DA) and differential state (DS) analysis for flow and mass cytometry - tests which cell populations change in frequency or marker expression between conditions using diffcyt (edgeR/voom/GLMM for DA, limma/LMM for DS), with cydar, CITRUS, and compositional methods (sccomp, scCODA, DCATS) as alternatives. Covers the sample-is-the-experimental-unit principle, design/contrast and mixed-model formulas, compositionality of cluster proportions, and FDR across clusters. Use when comparing populations between groups, choosing a DA method, handling paired/batch designs, or deciding whether compositional correction is needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs alchemical free-energy calculations including relative binding free energy (RBFE / FEP+) and absolute binding free energy (ABFE) via OpenFE, FEP+, GROMACS, AMBER pmemd, and OpenMM with explicit lambda scheduling, soft-core potentials, MBAR/BAR analysis, cycle-closure validation, and protocol-appropriate enhanced sampling. Compares ML alternatives (Boltz-2 affinity, DeepDock). Use when ranking analogs by binding affinity beyond docking accuracy, performing prospective lead optimization, or validating SAR predictions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Corrects the gene-independent copy-number artifact in CRISPR-Cas9 screens (Aguirre 2016 / Munoz 2016 Cancer Discov) where amplified loci appear essential from DNA-damage burden of simultaneous cuts. Covers the gene-independent DNA-damage / G2-arrest mechanism, CRISPRcleanR (Iorio 2018) unsupervised pre-hoc correction, CERES (Meyers 2017) joint CN + gene-effect model, Chronos (Dempster 2021) DepMap-standard population-dynamics + CN model with lowest residual bias, the decision tree by data availability, the Spearman LFC-vs-CN diagnostic, focal-amplification examples (ERBB2 in HER2+, MYC in colorectal, FGFR1 in head and neck), and CRISPRi/a alternatives that bypass the artifact. Use when screening cancer cell lines, diagnosing essentiality at amplified loci, choosing CRISPRcleanR / CERES / Chronos, deciding whether CN correction is needed before MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / drugZ, or switching from Cas9 to CRISPRi.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when optimizing test suite performance — database setup, seeder optimization, parallel testing, CI pipeline efficiency, or RefreshDatabase alternatives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing between alternatives with trade-offs — X-or-Y decisions or a weighted decision matrix / gewichtete Entscheidungsmatrix ('score my options'); ADR via `adr-create`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce 3+ distinct hi-fi design variations — basic to bold, one file with tweak controls — when the user asks for options, alternatives, "show me a few takes". Extends fe-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Combine independent work from two or more selected agents into one decision-ready research report, design, or proposal. Preserve useful complementary findings, develop stronger combined options, and present material alternatives only when they exist. Use when multiple perspectives should improve the product without forcing consensus or staging disagreement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quando o usuário quer criar páginas de comparação com concorrentes ou alternativas para SEO e ativação de vendas. Use também quando o usuário menciona 'página de alternativas', 'página vs', 'comparação com concorrentes', 'página de comparação', '[Produto] vs [Produto]', '[Produto] alternativa', ou 'landing pages competitivas'. Cobre quatro formatos: alternativa singular, alternativas plurais, você vs concorrente, e concorrente vs concorrente. Enfatiza pesquisa profunda, arquitetura de conteúdo modular e tipos de seção variados além de tabelas de recursos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load this skill whenever the project involves writing, editing, or reviewing content for a general audience, including UI copy, help text, error messages, documentation, and instructions. Under no circumstances use jargon, complex sentence structures, or unexplained acronyms without providing plain alternatives. Absolutely always target a reading level accessible to the broadest possible audience. Load alongside content-design/SKILL.md for all content work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。